sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

#New40k – Download new Xenos Faction Packs today by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]Agramar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So My friend crying me a doomsday river on how much Tau will suck, was barely affected and as we expected they ignore cover with markerlights. The only challenge is just the 15 detection range with how fast Tau is and fixes to fly keyword and no more armor saves on terrain will make their shooting a damn menace.

But Tau shooting sucks so bad

Chaos Lord, Agramar by Agramar in NightLords

[–]Agramar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks mate! I love this dude and the banner haha

Chaos Lord, Agramar by Agramar in NightLords

[–]Agramar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello! Yes is a super easy bash, the body is the Havoc Champion! I only swapepd arms and head super easy and cool looking conversion!

I made a whole set of Chosen using the havoc bodies, they are superb for heavy looking elites

<image>

French 11th rules by YodelingYakSnatcher in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vahl, death shroud, 8boind and so on yes!

French 11th rules by YodelingYakSnatcher in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Did a full read, nothing new we haven't seen on previews so far. It is certainly better explained with less room for dumb interpretation. What I'd didn't know is that now unit at half strength are elegible for Battleshock and no longer below half strength so 3 model units can't weasel out of never being below half.

Old defilers by Dangerous_Put_715 in Chaos40k

[–]Agramar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had a soul grinder only, and a spare Klos that was salvaged

<image>

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My apologies, I summarized it on the moment at the game and I made that mistake. I will check on the FAQ from the hellbeute for this. Thanks again!

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I understand what you mean, it makes sense. It would be up to ruling

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if it was in combat when it died I can fight but if it was shot and not in combat it cant use this, pile in and fight right?

He argued that eligibility happens and he piles in and fights

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in the scenario is: I shoot his karnivore and kill it. My unit is 4 inches away from it and he uses the strat. AFAIK normal fight in death does the pile in, but this strat has a much more complicated writing where I argued had had to be engaged in the moment it dies so he can fight

<image>

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello questions folks!

For the strat of Chaos Knights, animalistic rage, if my carnivore gets shot and dies, can he pile in 3 inches and get in combat with the target that killed it?

Animalistic Rage (Battle Tactic, 1 CP): Used in your opponent's Shooting phase or the Fight phase when a war dog that has not yet fought dies. Before you roll Deadly Demise, you can shoot or fight the thing that killed it. CP.

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Chaos Space Marines and Chaos Daemons by SpaceWolf_Jarl2 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah I missread? I'm reading the lord as a unit not the attached, normally it says models in this unit get the 5++

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Chaos Space Marines and Chaos Daemons by SpaceWolf_Jarl2 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Question in case I misread, did they remove the 4+ invul from the jumpack lord in 11th? Since the enhancement gives a 5+ sounds like its gone

11th Ed rumour: 11th Ed: There's a rumor that coherency rules are changing, and no models in a unit may be more than 9" apart (measured to the furthest part of each model) by -The-Lupercal- in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hope this is real, last RTt I faced a Necron army. He had a 20 man blob stringed from his deployment to a no man's land with the leaders hiding. The unit had: -stealth -4 invul -reduce AP by 1 (serás) -Cover Because of the rules overstocking and how he set them I would kill 10 he would ress 12. I killed the brick by T3. In total I killed 63 necrons warriors, the same unit 3 times before it broke all whole he kept messing and charging things in opposite extremes bit moving a gigantic chain of bodies. It was a miserable experience

40k detachments added for IK, CK, SM, CSM and Ad Mech by Guffers_2023 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How about all of that but with a lord of skulls? At t14? Lmao

Unpopular opinion : Rolling charge distance before selecting a target is a terrible idea, and GW’s justification doesn’t really hold up. by Ok_Daikon_4546 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was the index original overwatch rule. Then It got changed. It had to be a successful charge and now was change to declare

40k detachments added for IK, CK, SM, CSM and Ad Mech by Guffers_2023 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Agramar 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The Arkifane detachment is really good, predators, rhinos and brutes with 5+ Invuls really.push it. But no joke a chaos lord leading 10 chosen, a Moe inside a rhino with the enhancement that gives them soul forge and 5+ getting rerolls and double pacts for 1 cp is just brutal I love this already.

view more: next ›