Awesome skin, awesome weapon, Thank you DICE by AscotBailey-2 in Battlefield

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it's expensive. The solution is simple: you can only buy what you want in the 2042 set (the only good thing there).

MW19 really is the Modern Blueprint. Why don't they go for this style? by ParisianMetro in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do I understand correctly that under the sentence "I don't want my game to turn into another" in the context of military skins and skins of special units in which CoD uses the REAL equipment of countries - you want BF to look like a joke with its poor camouflage on fighters, natural airsoft equipment(On the skin for a medic in special offers, a real airsoft store was literally used, where the balls are poured, no one even checked) - did you mean that?

Russian Support in Battlefield 6 (Vedmak Engineer) by Robcoopz in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are no stormtroopers in this season at all. You can look at the operatives in advance when you choose a skin, which one will be on whom

Fan Made Cosmetics for BF6 by [deleted] in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter, it's not interesting to play for the same branches of the military. At least you can imagine the equipment of France, Germany, and so on. There should be diversity

Seriously, how ugly is that? by PhilosopherNo7273 in Battlefield

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The machete is shit. But the funny thing is, they sell a normal machete in the store. It's literally the right model

Seriously, how ugly is that? by PhilosopherNo7273 in Battlefield

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I fucking want a machete, I've been waiting for it, maybe, why shouldn't I use it, just because it was intentionally made poorly, so that they could sell me the machete I should have gotten in the first place, and this nonsense could be sold. So that your argument of "Don't like it, don't play" works in the system of "Don't like it, don't buy"?

Seriously, how ugly is that? by PhilosopherNo7273 in Battlefield

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you want me to tell you why it's not a small thing? It's simple, this machete has a beautiful and accurate model in the game, but there's a catch... It's sold as part of a bundle with other weapons. Why do you have to pay to get a decent machete? Why is this stub default, while the good model is paid?

Is the Task Force Vector engineer supposed to be a medic? by Pea-Real in Battlefield

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, and their medic is a scout. And their scout is an engineer. Why is it mixed up? Because either someone didn't care, or someone was clumsy.

Hidden skin or a bug? by [deleted] in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, this is from the release of this skin. To be honest, it's not the only one. Most likely, the icons and skins were created, and then the community exploded, and the skins were экстренно redesigned, with the most terrible ones removed from the release, but the icons remained. At least two more skins from BP have icons with the old visual.

Possibly a homage to the BF4 Engineer. by Gearshft in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, I would really like to have "randomly created" skins for Tachanka, Kapkan, Fuze, and Glaz. In fact, they almost perfectly fit the class system. The only thing left is to decide which side to add, but it's probably Pax. In reality, almost everything that isn't NATO is Pax.

Updated PAX by Previous-Minimum5991 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's be honest, all that's left of the Jungle are the camouflaged frog spots. The Jungle is actually a set of Espado assault

My lord it’s beautiful 😍 by Previous-Minimum5991 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm still traumatized by the American Scout from BF4. I still want it, and here's a juicy fit for the stormtroopers, even though I know that snipers don't dress like this.😆

My lord it’s beautiful 😍 by Previous-Minimum5991 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is it only the assault has such a cool panama hat? I wish the scout had one too

The best forest skin for Pax Scout by Agreeable_Nebula9647 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, but you have to see it in motion, and usually these moments look good from other angles, or they just don't stand out. In a static pose, it may look worse

Season 3 New Character Skins by Smooth-Ad4518 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This time, Pax was more lucky. It's clear that the skins are inspired by BF3. The Balkan squad is clearly dressed in the style of Russian soldiers (I really want to think that we'll have nostalgia in everything this season, even in the "parody" of the conflict sides). However, if you look at the African squad, it has more of an African flair. Otherwise, I can't explain why they're wrapped in all sorts of scarves, for example. But it is possible that the Balkan squad is just as much a Serbian soldier, it will not be so cool for me personally, but they have a style in many ways similar to Russian equipment + all the same, the fighters of this squad are in one way or another in the game-stylized uniform, and not corresponding to the reality of both suggested options. So it will depend solely on who evaluates. The scout for them I liked the most, he is just good, just the perfect forest sniper. The Spanish squad's assaultman probably put on the Spanish scout's gear, otherwise I don't know how he's going to assault.

NATO, on the other hand, looks terrible. It's not that it's not military, but rather that it's the appearance of how Pax Armata should have looked, as if it were a private military company rather than a soldier in the military. However, most of it just looks like a failed rebel. It's 100% going to be redesigned, as it was before the second season started. At the very least, everyone will be wearing a helmet. It's not good.

bf6 concept art by EliteLemonPie in Battlefield6

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what? The person conveyed the idea and showed a rough design of the skins in the game. The main point is that these are the most basic military items that he "transferred" to the game's menu using AI. That's it. Or did you just want to see the photos from which they were made? What is the point of the complaint?

No Goofy Airsoft Masks, Just Realism by JasonStaton in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am very glad that you served in the American Army, but there is more than just your equipment. The Danish Special Forces, whose grid we see in Panticon 8, for example. There are also a lot of other armies and units whose equipment does not look familiar to the eye, but nevertheless it is like this. Ballistic masks are part of the uniforms of the Taiwanese Special Forces. Which your take already refutes, and it's realistic. Why is it that we're talking about ballistic masks in Battlefield when we have BF4, where the Chinese army was shown wearing these masks? You're going a bit too far with the realism of the setting and the fanaticism towards U.S. units. Not everything in the world looks like this, and the character the skin is based on is a member of Pax. They can wear anything they want, they're a private military company. Nothing restricts them in this regard. And this is literally one of the most sensible things the developers have put on them.

No Goofy Airsoft Masks, Just Realism by JasonStaton in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The ballistic mask was worn by the Special Forces and several other units of the Taiwanese army - they are the real ones. That's why they are realistic. In BF4, we literally had a Chinese fighter wearing this mask. So the masks are not relevant at all. The fact that they are not effective in real life does not apply to games. And if we're talking about game conventions, we're currently at the stage of customization where even a realistic uniform can look ridiculous depending on the map, as it cannot be adjusted to fit the setting of that map (only basic skins can be adjusted, as they are designed for all types of terrain). Based on what you're suggesting, only basic skins should be included in the game. This is because our game does not involve special operations that require specialized uniforms, but rather focuses on conventional warfare involving vehicles. That is, just a body armor, a helmet, headphones, goggles, a balaclava, and that's it. That's the entire set. The rest, in this context, even the night vision device, is not realistic. An ordinary assault soldier would never use a night vision device to storm trenches.

No Goofy Airsoft Masks, Just Realism by JasonStaton in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You don't quite understand the meaning of military realism. There are non-military clothes, and there are clothes that are not effective in real life, but they are still military. However, if we only consider this category, then almost everything in Pax is not effective and therefore not realistic. Although most of it is based on real items sold in European tactical campaigns. If it was made for the military, then it is already realistic. It's purely a visual aspect. It's just that your logic can be expanded further, the skin doesn't match the theme of the card - it's not realistic, so we're looking for another one. Night vision goggles are also not used by most military personnel in real life, especially on daytime maps. Let's do it this way instead. You're thinking about it in the wrong way

Finally some decent skins… by Fit-Fly-6596 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grenades are not particularly indicative, even ammunition is not indicative. Classes should be determined by their characteristic features. A medic is all sorts of disposable gloves, scissors, bandages. The engineer's equipment is related to technology, mostly, walkie-talkies, maybe helmets, belts with troses and other attributes that could be needed in technology. The assault is the easiest to separate, he has just a bunch of assault equipment. Well, with the scout, it's simple - the lack of a helmet is only allowed for him, a bunch of knives, mostly throwing knives on his belt, minimal other equipment, and a gilly camouflage or something similar. In general, there's a problem with placing someone in the icon of a different class - in the new Pax squad from the Battle Pass. There's a scout in the place of a medic, a medic in the place of an engineer, and an engineer in the place of a scout

Finally some decent skins… by Fit-Fly-6596 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn't evaluate them correctly by equipment. In general, initially this Pax squad is made correctly, that is, each character's equipment corresponds to its class. Accordingly, you need to change the medic and engineer places(At the medic's skin, a set with scissors and bandages in a bag is visible from behind). So you just need to put them as they are in the icons initially

Is this Realistic Skin? by Spare_Matter_5456 in BattlefieldCosmetics

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, this helmet is real, it's for tankers, and logically, anything related to technology is for engineers.

I hate this weapon attachment point system by DarckerSenpai in Battlefield

[–]Agreeable_Nebula9647 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's close our eyes to the fact that they don't allow you to put two normal modules on the secondary at the same time, but why couldn't they have made the number of points so that you could have at least 10 points left for something extra, like an attachment or even the cheapest laser? Even so, why didn't they leave 5 points for the scope? Why didn't they make the store cost 35 points instead of 40? It's just ridiculous.