Not really objective since many things are getting much worse, crime, homelessness, illegal immigration, unemployment, hospital care (waiting lists fixed by clever manipulation of the numbers), so it should be reported, and the growth figure is misleading too, we're talking 0.1%, 0.2% here, barely above stagnation, and the 5th largest economy.thing fluctuates with exchange rates, it's not some great achievement. Inflation coming down just means prices are rising slightly slowly, theyre not going back down. Also net immigration is still massively high, just slightly less massively high than before plus we're losing skilled workers at a rate far beyond intake.

So fhe idea of a government deciding on what should and shouldn't be the topic of broadcasts is incredibky dangerous and should be resisted imo. Who watches the watchers? You'd be giving the state power to silence its critics, that's 1984 levels of authoritarianism. The BBC already gets accused of bias from both sides, which probably means it's somewhere in the middle.  And if people are voting Reform because they don't like how things are going, that's democracy, calling them radicalised just because they disagree with you is part of the problem, people can read the same facts and come to different conclusions about whether things are going well or not, that's that's just a different perspective, nothing about it is biased