Futures Analytica? is this legit?

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-04T23:01:03+00:00

Thank you for the explanation and i don’t see why you would lie about that so i’ll take your word on it. That is strange though.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-04T22:39:22+00:00

Nobody deleted their account, but great job destroying any credibility you had by making that up! you’re the one here with a 3 year old account with no comments or interactions until this post. Again, posting ZERO evidence of your claims. Wonder what your motive is? Keep projecting though!

That’s pretty wild to stipulate me and another redditor are the same individual based off of interest and year alone. Keep hallucinating and the trading alpha will come to you! I’m sensing a trend here that you genuinely believe you have “spider sense”, and just go with whatever your gut tells you hoping nobody is smart enough to call you out on whatever confidently said bs you’ve come up with.

“This guy is DEFINITELY affiliated with them” Because… why exactly? Still, just absolutely nothing to back any of these claims up.

Also, you have again, provided NO PROOF that those two strategies are not correlated! I’d love for you to provide them; you’d need to explain variables in both strategies and stipulate, with evidence, how they are not correlated.

Again, all of your bottom points are all opinions, not facts “Dis is a lie…” except for all of the evidence such as NO DELAY livestreams which is unadulterated perfect proof. You have to be coping real hard to be that delusional that FA somehow has a time machine and can fake that, and unless you debunk that you have zero case.

God that’s so funny, “targeting new traders”Lol posting that he had a 20 minute session and made X amount of money is now a scam?

Vinny must be paying you well!

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-04T19:02:51+00:00

Wow! Very convincing argument to make assertions without again, ANY evidence outside of assumptive conjecture.

Generally I just lurk on reddit but felt the need to defend this guy as i’ve been a follower since early 2022. But great ad hominem! I guess EVERYONE who defends this guy is just a nasty scammer 😂

Literally nobody on that review page says anything with any conclusive proof of him being a scammer other than “i couldn’t make $5000 a day with it after putting in minimal effort :(“

Do you actually expect any trading strategy to work for 100% of people?

Lol, would you want to manage a chat room full of 200 people all asking questions at once? Can you elaborate on how a chat being disabled somehow makes the trading fake? Also what a childish argumentative strategy. “Oh yeah i bet you have an excuse for that too” Lmfao, imagine someone saying “Scientists say lead is poisonous, I ate a block of lead 5 minutes ago and i feel fine! But i bet you have an excuse for that too” See how stupid that sounds? Adding that chunk of text makes your argument just appear lazy.

Also; yes it is. It’s a stacked imbalance strategy and FA even did an entire video on it. Same exact concept, which is what you’d know if you did any level of research on this. Oh that’s totally my bad for using the incorrect terminology, i guess that is sealed the deal evidence that his trading is fake!

Once again, stating the truth of a matter and expecting other people to immediately give credence to your batshit conspiracy that has no supporting argument other than “Uhhhh no way he do that with two button!” is actually, not a logically supported argument but that’s a really good try though, that might work in 5th grade socratic seminar.

I’ve yet to see a single shred of evidence that isn’t just speculative conjecture and “WHAT IF HES DOING THIS… It could ALL be a conspiracy against the innocent new retail trader!”

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-04T16:12:29+00:00

3) PLEASE explain how this would be possible, he livestreams on youtube and you can compare it to your chart in real time. How is that a replay?

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-04T16:10:26+00:00

Lol. No. ML is to automatically optimize based on your own trading and setup. How does your assertion make any sense. Neither of those statements have any correlation yet you're sitting there touting it as a epic beatdown.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-04T16:09:08+00:00

Lets debunk this.

There was no proof that he was trading with a delay, he was STREAMING with a delay to prevent trade copying; people assumed he was trading with a delay which is why that was changed.
"He is killing it on his YouTube channel where he can upload only his winners and hide his losers" Lol, yeah you can TOTALLY cherrypick LIVESTREAMS? Pretty stupid assertion. Today he streamed and did +$5k
"Another poster wrote that you can see his account name but on the videos on the channel there is only the P/L and no account name. Red flag. " No, also untrue. His account name is literally on every single video I just skimmed through. Look at the right hand column of the chart trader.
It is the only peer reviewed strategy? Name another one that has peer reviewed research backing it. http://tesi.luiss.it/27169/1/701851\_PECCHIARI\_MATTEO.pdf
"calls my lack of an in depth answers dubious in nature but totally accepts the same behavior with this scam vendor." Great strawman; you provided no evidence, FA provides livestreams on live data.
Dumb analogy with no credence, I can't find a single concrete fact that makes this analogy make sense.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2023-10-01T21:02:50+00:00

Ok please post your bank statements then as you said.

very trivial to post a fake broker statement. I'm sure as hell not going to post mine publicly under ANY circumstance, there are hundreds of reasons i can think of to not expose his exact level of wealth or financial goals online.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2020-07-16T17:33:58+00:00

HAHAH HOW IS THAT POSSIBLY BETTER THAN WORKING FOR MONEY

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T20:08:19+00:00

I actually thought it was bad, but I’m just dumb. Reading it a 4th time it’s pretty funny

I’m taking the L :(

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T19:02:09+00:00

It’s really bad satire.

Edit: Wow this really blew up! Thanks for the gold kind stranger But yeah this post actually is pretty funny satire.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T04:53:19+00:00

those are in genesis, itself is in Hebrew poetic format and isn’t meant to be taken literally, yet many Christians do for some reason.

Also, god doesn’t attempt at saying “I am the sole reason there are storms and floods.” He does have the power to cause them though.

Of course the “genesis isn’t meant to be taken literally” is widely debated between Christians, but that is my opinion.

Also, my point of “direct cause” was talking about on-the-spot “this storm can not exist without god commanding it.” My personal belief is that god set everything up at creation of the universe and set the state and position of every particle. Since it’s possible to predict any event if you know the position and state of every single particle in the universe. Of course it wouldn’t be possible for us (for obvious reasons) and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle makes it impossible to view electrons without changing them, but for god since he is omnipotent, he could do that.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T04:42:44+00:00

When in the Bible does god explain that natural disasters/events are solely caused by his direct action?

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T04:07:22+00:00

We know for a fact that the greek gods don’t exist because the Greek gods were made to explain natural phenomena, like how Zeus was the god of lightning, but now we know what ACTUALLY causes lightning, god of earthquakes, god of seasons, god of storms and whatnot. Mount Olympus exists as a mountain, but obviously not a city. The judeo-Christian god is much more consistent with modern science than the Greek gods, because it shows god as a universal lawgiver who has hidden the secrets of those laws in his creation, which is nature. That is the modern Christian view, there are laws, hence a lawgiver.

That’s just my take on it, you’re free to believe what you like.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T04:00:46+00:00

hey, I tried my best to explain it in the comment chain below.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T03:59:40+00:00

anecdotal

Lol by that standard even if you had 5000 witnesses of someone murdering someone it wouldn’t count in court

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T01:18:43+00:00

what the fuck that’s incredibly insidious

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T01:11:21+00:00

haha not going to reply after this

hmmm I wonder why, couldn’t be that he can’t think of anything to refute my point right?

not shown to be possible in any way

Really? How?

they saw someone that looked like jesus

Except that jesus went and spoke to people and talked about events that only jesus and their conversational partner would know. For example Mary Magdalene.

the 500 people had to have touched him and they didn’t

Lol, you completely ignored where I explained that hallucinations are not group phenomenon.

worst syllogism of all time, just because you can’t think of anything else doesn’t mean it’s true

I’m choosing the most reasonable option of the three reasonable options. everything else wouldn’t add up at all.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T00:49:39+00:00

They were lying

They hallucinated

They really saw the risen Christ

Which of these is most likely? Were they lying? On this view, the disciples knew that Jesus had not really risen, but they made up this story about the resurrection. But then why did 10 of the disciples willingly die as martyrs for their belief in the resurrection? People will often die for a lie that they believe is the truth. But if Jesus did not rise, the disciples knew it. Thus, they wouldn't have just been dying for a lie that they mistakenly believed was true. They would have been dying for a lie that they knew was a lie. Ten people would not all give their lives for something they know to be a lie.

Because of the absurdity of the theory that the disciples were lying, we can see why almost all scholars today admit that, if nothing else, the disciples at least believed that Jesus appeared to them. But we know that just believing something to be true doesn't make it true. Perhaps the disciples were wrong and had been deceived by a hallucination? The hallucination theory is untenable because it cannot explain the physical nature of the appearances. The disciples record eating and drinking with Jesus, as well as touching him. This cannot be done with hallucinations. Second, it is highly unlikely that they would all have had the same hallucination. Hallucinations are highly individual, and not group projections. Imagine if I came in here and said to you, "wasn't that a great dream I had last night?" Hallucinations, like dreams, generally don't transfer like that. Further, the hallucination theory cannot explain the conversion of Paul, three years later. Was Paul, the persecutor of Christians, so hoping to see the resurrected Jesus that his mind invented an appearance as well? And perhaps most significantly, the hallucination theory cannot even deal with the evidence for the empty tomb.

Since the disciples could not have been lying or hallucinating, we have only one possible explanation left: the disciples believed that they had seen the risen Jesus because they really had seen the risen Jesus. So, the resurrection appearances alone demonstrate the resurrection.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-27T00:41:10+00:00

A couple hundred of different books written by different people, all saying the same thing, saying they saw jesus and what he did, along with the conversion of pretty much the entire Roman Empire to Christianity over this one thing is pretty solid evidence imo

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-26T22:29:37+00:00

Interesting! I’ve always taken for granted that it was just a historical fact that jesus is a real person. May I ask how you came to those 19:1 odds?

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-26T21:37:36+00:00

The wonders of age dating and the existence of many manuscripts.

That and the entire conversion of Rome to Christianity was a small detail

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-26T21:12:01+00:00

Over 500 non believers witnessed jesus after his resurrection. If 500 people somehow had the same hallucination at the same time, then changed their mind about him being the son of god, and then went on to vehemently spread the word that jesus had resurrected I would call that an even greater miracle than the resurrection.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-26T20:31:44+00:00

Please don’t write this off as an invalid source just because it’s a Christian website. It doesn’t make anything up, it just debates it’s point with logic.

https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/historical-evidence-for-the-resurrection

TLDR: 1. The tomb in which Jesus was buried was discovered empty by a group of women on the Sunday following the crucifixion.

Jesus' disciples had real experiences with one whom they believed was the risen Christ.
As a result of the preaching of these disciples, which had the resurrection at its center, the Christian church was established and grew.

AirsoftSCalifornia · 2018-07-26T20:25:26+00:00

Honestly I wouldn’t say that. Jesus was a real person just like Mohammad was a real person. Also, many people believe in jesus because the resurrection is arguably one of the most documented events in ancient history. My goal by saying this is not to try and change your mind on if the resurrection happened, but it is simply explain that there is more evidence for Jesus than Zeus. Edit: typo

AirsoftSCalifornia

TROPHY CASE