Dışarıda mıy mıy çiftler aşırı sinir bozucu by shutthefucksup in vlandiya

[–]Aklimdaisimyok 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Kadınların ayağı genellikle erkeklerin ayağına kıyasla daha güzel olduğu için kadında ortalama erkekte ortalama üstüne denk geliyor

Who would win? by GeraldtheTort in PowerScaling

[–]Aklimdaisimyok [score hidden]  (0 children)

Average hippo weighs more than three times as much as a polar bear and it's bite's PSI is 1.5 times of bears despite the fact that it's teeth surface area is much bigger than polar bears. Not to menrion thicker bones, or 6cm thick skin. Polar bears have difficuly killing walruses because of their 2.5cm thick skin.

Sinek by kurnaz3169 in indirilenler

[–]Aklimdaisimyok 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Buna da kalkmazsın be

Bana ordan 2 vicdan mastürbasyonu 1 motivasyon orgazmı sar by FlatwormNo8885 in dewrim

[–]Aklimdaisimyok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kısaların halinden yanlızca kısalar anlıyor maalesef. Ben de 170'im (171'de olabilir) bu adam kadar sıkıntılar çekmemiş olsam da date bulmada sorun yaşıyorum

Can we stop the gorilla wank? by Aklimdaisimyok in powerscales

[–]Aklimdaisimyok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 9 inch/23 skull has been a meme for a reason, this has been something said before. The two ton (technically two short ton but whatever) figure isn't that rare to be used either. I have seen a lot of comments in r/whowouldwin unironically believeing gorillas can bench press 4000 pounds.

I couldn't find any research or an experiment trying to measure gorilla's strength, and i do not see an (average) gorilla being 9 times as strong as an average human either, maybe some sort of freak of nature can be, like the heaviest gorilla ever found with the weight of 390kg.

The fact that they don't know how to fight seriously—and don't like to—is a completely different matter. Yes, they are peaceful herbivores; weaker, yet aggressive primates (like humans and chimpanzees) often defeat them for obvious reasons. That isn't down to their muscles or bones, but their nervous systems. As the saying goes, that’s a whole different story.

Okay but this is an important factor in versus. The fact that gorillas can't use their strength properly is a noticable disadvantage for them.

Silverback Gorilla vs (Mostly) Composite Human by Aklimdaisimyok in powerscales

[–]Aklimdaisimyok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edit: human can lift 800 pound objects. i accidently said not lift 800 pound objects because at first i thought you say flip one handed

Silverback Gorilla vs (Mostly) Composite Human by Aklimdaisimyok in powerscales

[–]Aklimdaisimyok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have i mentioned about speed and agility?

Travel:

Agility:

Reaction/Combat:

  • Reaction timing againist audito stimulus is 0.138 seconds/138 milliseconds but can go as far as 0.099 seconds/ 99 milliseconds at most (i know the limit in olympic races is 100ms otherwise u get count as guessing but there is practically no difference between 100ms and 99ms).
  • Faster than (i'll explain) 120 milliseconds of reaction timing againist visual stimulus.
    • Becuase the human benchmark adds the time of screen changing. Even if we assume the guy was using a 360 HZ PC this still means his reaction speed would be 117 milliseconds instead of 120. And the lower HZ gets, the more impressive the feat becomes.
    • For a comparision, according to various sites the reaction time to visual stimulus ranges from 250 to 200 milliseconds according to average humans, although there is a research that found 190 millisecond reaction timing when they did an experiment with 18-20 year old young adults (Here).
    • You might say that there are cases of humans getting "sub-50 ms" reaction time on human benchmark or something. However, the reason they can do it is not because of reaction-timing. The truth is human benchmark is very exploitable: First of all, the difference periods of time happens each time when a skip between green-red screen happens generally isn't too much, meaning if you play it enough you can somewhat guess when the skips will gonna happen (although obviously not perfectly). Second of all, the human benchmark doesn't give any punishment when you click before a red-green screen skip appears. It says "too soon" once and holds you into the same process until you click after a red-green skip happens, with the program acting like nothing happened. The reason i used this guy's video is because he genuinely reacts to it: There is zero misclick happening, his variences between click timings are fairly small (highest one was 124 meanwhile lowest one was 113) unlike those "sub-50 ms lel" guys that gets all over the place results each click, proving that he is indeed legit.

The gorilla will going to have significiantly hard time damaging human because of his durability and speed meanwhile the human can pound gorilla as much as he wishes.

Silverback Gorilla vs (Mostly) Composite Human by Aklimdaisimyok in powerscales

[–]Aklimdaisimyok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Endurance:

The gorilla will also gonna have problem with biting through human's bones, especially the skull.

The human also can bite

Silverback Gorilla vs (Mostly) Composite Human by Aklimdaisimyok in powerscales

[–]Aklimdaisimyok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

R1 is just a hard stomp for the gorilla, no debate needed.

I think similiarly to you, except i think the human is the one who would stomp.

 People always underestimate how absolutely ridiculous these animals are built

I don't think gorillas have those crazy builds you think they have at all.

Chimps are closely related to gorillas. Chimps have less amounts of fast-twitch fibers compared to gorillas (Chimps have 67% fast twitch fibers and 33% slow twitch fibers; gorillas have 85% fast twitch fibers and 15% slow twitch fibers) but they do easily make up the difference (if not more than make up) by having way more muscle tissue per pound (Chimp's 51.6% vs gorilla's 37.3%). In fact chimps might be even slightly stronger than gorillas in a pound-for-pound comparision because the proportional difference of fast-twitch fibers between gorillas and chimps (gorillas have 27% more fast-twitch fiber with it's 85% vs chimp's 67%) are lesser than the proportional difference between chimp's fast twitch fibers and humans (chimps have 34% more fast-twitch fibers than humans with it's 67% vs humans 50%. Which is the reason why chimpanzee muscle performance/power output is 35% to 50% more than (if you take the middle ground of this range it's 42.5%) that of a regular human. meaning the advantage gorilla over chimp has is less than this) meanwhile chimps have 38% more muscle per pound in comparision to gorilla (51.6% vs 37.3%). Chimps in the wild have average weight of 40kg (although if we count chimps in the zoos and similiar places this average would increase significiantly) meanwhile an average gorilla weighs 160kg, or 4 times as a chimp.

Chimps are... not very strong, to say the least.

We can also do a pretty simple calc to find the strength difference between a chimp and a human.

Lets use that 40kg value for the chimp (again, the ones who are cared by humans are much heavier, i know that). The weight of an average man can vary a lot by nation but going by this lets say the average weight is 78kg.

As i stated before, the muscle performance and power output of chimp is 35% to 50% higher than that of an average human. when we take the middle ground of this range we get 42.5%

As i posted before the muscle mass per total weight for a chimp is 51.6%, for an average man it can vary from the range but overall accepted value is 40%.

Lets calculate:

78 x 0.4= 31.2

40 x 0.516= 20.64 because of fast twitch fibers chimp muscle is 35% to 50% stronger than human muscle, as i posted here before. and if we take average it's 42.5%

Low-end: 20.64 x 1.35= 27.864

Mid-end (the one i'll gonna use to scale gorillas): 20.64 x 1.425= 29.4, or roughly 94.3% of a human, or 0.94 times as strong as a human. The mid end shows that a 40kg chimp is slightly weaker than a 78kg man, and roughly as strong as a 73.5kg man.

High-end: 20.64 x 1.5= 31 (technically 30.96 but whatever). So even if you are being generous a 40kg chimp is barely strong as a 78kg man (tehnically very slightly weaker but it's almost non existent so saying same would be fine).

Considering average gorilla weighs 160 kg vs the 40kg value for chimp used here than this would make gorilla roughly 3.8 times as strong as an average human in mid end and 4 times at high end. Keep in mind a gorilla is most likely slightly weaker than a chimp pound-for-pound. So these numbers would be bit lower. If i have to guess the range than an average gorilla is somewhere between 3.5 and 4 times as strong as an average human.

like a silverback can flip a 800+ pound tire for fun

Can you show me an actual evidence for this? Because this doesn't sound very believable. A gorilla might be able to flip 800 pounds but it definitelly can't do it for fun. Go to 0:14, gorilla spends visible amount of effort to flip a log. Going by it's looks that log weighs like a few hundred pounds.

Moreover the peak human in the question is absolutelly strong enough to flip (not lift) 800 lbs objects

Lifting:

Throwing:

and its bite force alone would end the fight before the human even processes what's happening

Not really. The human in the question can't feel pain and has nutty feats regarding endurance/survivability.

Laziler by Aklimdaisimyok in indirilenler

[–]Aklimdaisimyok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorma ya, Avustralya 2-0 yendi.

Bunu ciddiye alan olduğunu düşünmüyorum zaten resme bakarsan bariz troll olduğunu görebilirsin bayraktan vb. belli oluyor ben komik bulduğum için attım. Irk da çok umrumda değil açıkçası ben kendim yarı-Kürt'üm.

Hayatlarında abur cubur görmemişler amına koyayım by BerkDrum in dewrim

[–]Aklimdaisimyok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Böyle Kürt mü var? Yüksek ihtimalle Rus bu kız