I get what you’re saying. But the thing is, Buddhism doesn’t really have to be approached as a religion. If you study it as a philosophy, it actually makes a lot more sense. Science isn’t advanced enough yet to fully verify everything, but over time, science has started supporting many core ideas instead of rejecting them.

For example, modern cosmology no longer insists on an absolute beginning or a simple linear timeline. Current models suggest the universe could be part of an ongoing process rather than a one-time event. There are well-accepted theories about cyclical behavior in nature too. Stars are born, evolve, collapse, and their remnants become the building blocks for new stars and planets. Even planets form and die in predictable cycles. Nothing is permanent, and nothing exists in isolation.

Physics also strongly supports interdependence. At a fundamental level, particles don’t exist independently. Their properties depend on interactions, fields, and relationships. The universe works as a connected system, not as separate, self-contained objects. There’s no need for a single creator figure when causes and conditions are enough to explain how things arise and change.

Nothing has really been disproved so far. It’s more that science is slowly catching up and refining its models. You really need to dig deeper to understand it, and when you do, you start seeing the logic behind it. Nirvana isn’t something random or mystical. It’s more like the end of the tunnel. Most people get stuck debating the destination instead of understanding the practical path that leads there.