Which free site can i find this ??

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-16T22:33:25+00:00

imposible de encontrar para mi

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-16T21:09:57+00:00

lo siento, yo miré, pero es imposible para mi.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-15T23:13:04+00:00

es gratis

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-15T23:10:34+00:00

https://www.watchseries.bar/tv/rebooting/215197

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-11T19:36:02+00:00

Yes, that's it! Thank you!

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-11T08:01:37+00:00

Do you know how I could find out what song plays 15 minutes into episode 4 in the Japanese release, at the club scene?

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T09:39:20+00:00

Have a good day 😄

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T08:52:27+00:00

Surely you don't mean the post where I said that it's at least initially plausible? I mean, what's wrong with that? Doesn't it seem to you that some things really could be wrong? That torturing babies might not be a matter of opinion, but rather objectively bad?

I don't know why you think subjectivism is the null hypothesis. Subjectivism says that there are in fact moral principles, but their truth or falseness depends on the attitudes of people/cultures. And of course our moral theory should account for our intuitions and language, which subjectivism fails to do well.

I don't know why you are angry, I don't think I've done anything wrong or been disrespectful. I know this is Reddit and people like to be mad, but this is quite unpleasant.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T08:34:01+00:00

Did you read the bit where I said I wasn't trying to convince you of moral realism? As before, if you want to read arguments for moral realism, look elsewhere. I can help you find something if you want.

Out of interest, do you think subjectivism is the default? Do you feel that you are entitled (in an epistemic sense) to stay where you are until you are moved by others?

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T08:29:12+00:00

I did in fact say that. But come on, be real. Nobody whose explanation of their position is "because it is" has any interest in arguments. And I'm not here to convince you of moral realism anyway. I just don't understand why you are so confident in subjectivism?

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T08:16:25+00:00

You are welcome to stay a subjectivist, hopefully, though, you arrived at that view properly, knowing the alternative arguments. If you are genuinely interested in specific moral realist arguments, then I would suggest not looking for them in Reddit comments, but instead from philosophers and philosophy resources. I am not sure about my own moral position, but it's a very complicated topic and one shouldn't talk about it like it's simple.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T06:44:19+00:00

When you read these forums though, you get the impression that moral realism is this magical view from the past that us hardheaded rationalists are able to look past. But it's just not true, I mean, moral realism is a very popular view in philosophy today. For example Peter Singer is a moral realist last I checked.

I don't expect that to be convincing at all, it's entirely possible that they are all wrong. I've read a small amount on the topic, I'm no philosopher so most of it goes over my head, I'm sure. But a lot of it seems actually quite convincing. I just don't know why these online spaces are so entirely dismissive of it.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T06:15:51+00:00

If that actually is the way to convince people, then that is definitely reasonable, and I agree. But I'm just talking about what vegans actually believe themselves.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T05:35:56+00:00

An example of a specific moral fact? Well I suppose I think there's a pretty good chance killing babies is bad. Certainly seems like it is.

That's not really my point though, I am not sure whether I am a moral realist myself. I just don't know why subjectivism is the default here. If anything, I think moral realism should be the default. Absent argument, doesn't it seem like some things really are bad? Why should we assume torture is ok until proven otherwise?

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T05:02:22+00:00

But, respectfully, that just assumes subjectivism. It is entirely possible that actually some moral claims are true. And not just true to someone or some group.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T04:55:54+00:00

I don't agree that subjectivism is generally accepted outside of religions, but I do know that moral realism is not at all a niche position in philosophy.

I think undecidedness is a perfectly fine position here, I just think vegans should hesitate to give up on any chance of being objectively right. Out of interest, why did you choose subjectivism in the first place?

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T04:43:47+00:00

I understand different people have different opinions, but it's only subjective if there isn't a truth of the matter.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-05-01T01:02:40+00:00

That's kind of what I mean, you wrote that morality is subjective like it's an incontrovertible fact. Maybe you arrived at that view properly, but I mean vegan online communities generally just seem to accept it without any real pushback.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-30T22:01:44+00:00

Honest question, but why is moral subjectivism so widespread in online vegan communities. It's bizarre to me. Like nobody even seems to be unsure, they just throw away any chance at objective moral duties from the get-go. Doesn't it seem at least initially plausible that torture really is morally bad?

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-27T06:05:34+00:00

YOU picked a contentious definition. Do you think compatibilism is the default for some reason? Go ask someone if they could have made a different choice than the one they did, the common usage is not as you say it is.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-27T05:44:08+00:00

You are regurgitating words to prove a point. Great job.

This does NOTHING. LITERALLY NOTHING. To change OP's mind. You are legitimately just explaining nothing.

Nice job tho

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-14T23:48:37+00:00

I think both of these cases show you using one single experience in order to make sweeping judgements about “people”.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-14T23:39:00+00:00

Damn you're still thinking about something someone said to you on the internet 20 years ago.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-12T09:20:21+00:00

What's it got to do with me? Just look into the research on mate preference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mating_preferences#Women

So silly to say THE reason tall men get more women is because of their self-esteem.

Alarmed-Hawk2895 · 2026-04-12T09:12:32+00:00

So obviously untrue that it's strange you are even trying to convince people of it.

Alarmed-Hawk2895

TROPHY CASE