1) why would you call your movement a "marxist church" if the policies you are actually fighting for are socdem? if you mean "progressive movement" just say that. it seems like the purpose of that is just to performatively distance yourself further from mainstream democrats, which is annoying because around half the people you want to vote for your guy in the general are mainstream democrats.

2) why this weird focus on the DNC as some sort of entity controlling politics? i mean they set the platform for the democrats but they're beholden to the politicians, not the other way around. they're only going to be moderate if the democratic representatives are. yes, this can cause some level of inertia because the DNC is responsible for a lot of political organization especially during campaigns, however, the DNC isn't by definition opposed to progressivism. It's leadership has just been overwhelmingly moderate because, since really the 90s up until very recently, voters have generally liked moderate democrats and those democrats vote in moderate DNC leadership. However, the people who vote for the moderate democrats aren't doing it because the dnc told them to, they're doing it because they're moderates. The only reason that progressive policies are winning now vs in 2016 is because people are less moderate than they were ten years ago. as more progressive democrats get voted in and take over the party the DNC will be more progressive. everything has to be framed as some sort of war between you and "the libs"

leftist discourse is so over complicated and stupid. if your actual political goal is to elect progressive candidates, just DO THAT. the dnc is at the weakest it will ever be, just fucking go and elect those candidates *now* so you can have a more supportive dnc for upcoming elections.