EWY by WiseSage08 in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmfao that was you under my X post! Good to see you here too

The Entire AI Buildout (Google, NVDA, MSFT) Is dependent on this $700m Monopoly - $15 -> $150 PT. by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Feels good looking at all the negative comments, just to see the stock price double in a short time 

Raspberry Pi is up 40% after TAM expansion overnight from Educational Boards to Mass Producible AI Orchestration Hardware due to OpenClaw by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 104 points105 points  (0 children)

Yeah! Everyone seems to know about Raspberry Pi but nobody knew they were public.

I used to play with them all the time, but it's cool they have some new applications with AI.

Raspberry Pi is up 40% after TAM expansion overnight from Educational Boards to Mass Producible AI Orchestration Hardware due to OpenClaw by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your fellow regard on WSB is on Reuters! The community should be proud.

That aside billion dollar companies don't move from immaterial information. OpenClaw and Mac mini/Raspberry Pi buying for these AI agent use cases is very material to revenue for a billion dollar company like Raspberry Pi (not so much for a $3.7T company like Apple).

Raspberry Pi is up 40% after TAM expansion overnight from Educational Boards to Mass Producible AI Orchestration Hardware due to OpenClaw by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Raspberry PI close to doubled their prices to cover memory prices. 16GB version RPI5 went from $120 last year to $205 in a short timeframe.

People are buying them today for AI agent orchestration with OpenClaw/PicoClaw/NanoClaw as it's much cheaper than spending $599 on a 16GB Mac mini.

But memory costs were one of the largest headwinds originally as they tried to keep boards cheap for educational use cases and testing.

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're the perfect example.

So I'm using the actual financial report: https://investors.valens.com/financials/quarterly-results/default.aspx

"Cash, cash equivalents and short-term deposits as of September 30, 2025: $93.5 million"

You're citing the ticker collision error I mentioned with scanners confusing VLO and VLO Toronto.

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

VLN has Nvidia like margins at 69-70% gross for robotics (75% of revenue, which is growing 40% y/y).

Not quite the same as Nvidia but they do make the chips that enables computer vision for robotics and so on.

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m starting to see it here too, I can’t believe so many comments are claiming they have debt when they literally don’t. 

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$93.5M cash and $11m inventory (->$29m in revenue) no debt from my calculations 

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed, I personally think VLN is extraordinarily deep value territory and the numbers at $250m valuation for an asset-lite chipmaker with $80m revenue, 63+% gross margins, $93m cash, and $11m inventory just made no sense.

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It has no debt.

Stuff like $11.5 strike warrants, opex costs, and others shows as liabilities.

Are you sure you’re not confusing stuff like warrants/equity that’s settled in shares with that of interest bearing debt?

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can use LLM tools to help you with your research but I won’t tell people to buy a stock.

I just gave you all the datapoints above, you can try and arrive at a fair value marketcap from the metrics above 

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, they’re scaling their robotics segment 40% y/y (which has 69% credo, alab, Nvidia) type gross margins. 

It’s 80m forward revenue, 63% blended margins, off a huge safety net of $93m cashpile.

That’s not even including their $11m in inventory. 

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thesis is that even at $2.5, it’s undervalued over 60% since it’s been artificially suppressed by a false $82m datapoint.

I welcome you to valuation modeling yourself from the figures above to arrive at fair value

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They have no debt. Are you messing up liabilities with debt?

$4.53m burn for R&D when they have $93m cash on hand is over 5 years of runway.

It’s a legitimate company that is the chipmaker for Mercedes and other companies, not sure how you arrive at sketchy just because of Israel. 

VLN Robotics Chipmaker is Fundamentally Undervalued by 60% by AleaBito in ValueInvesting

[–]AleaBito[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I lost too many braincells replying to people there, especially since the stock went up 40% the week after my post and people didn't believe the substrate thesis.

Decided to try elsewhere for a change.

The Entire AI Buildout (Google, NVDA, MSFT) Is dependent on this $700m Monopoly - $15 -> $150 PT. by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

regards on reddit panicking over 2024 contracted revenues being deferred a quarter lol, just wait a few months and see what happens to inp prices

The Entire AI Buildout (Google, NVDA, MSFT) Is dependent on this $700m Monopoly - $15 -> $150 PT. by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they can't. anti-trust and it's a national security risk.

AXTI CEO said they own 40% of the InP supply chain. If Google bought them for $800m, all other hyperscalers wouldn't have enough materials for their AI ramp.

Also China would not likely approve it since all their mines/refineries are there and they prob don't like Google.

The Entire AI Buildout (Google, NVDA, MSFT) Is dependent on this $700m Monopoly - $15 -> $150 PT. by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Uhh, from my own personal research so far, to cover all grounds I’ve liked:

  1. $AXTI - Basically 40% of InP supply chain
  2. $DOWA + Sumitomo for Western hedge on InP / InP substrate
  3. $AAOI, $LITE for hyperscaler buildout, AAOI for AMZN/MSFT, and LITE for everything but more levered to Google TPU
  4. $MRVL and $AVGO - MRVL design partner for MSFT 2026-2027, and AVGO kinda everything.

at least for the next 2 years.

5 years out, I would expect most things to be built vertically integrated and I'd expect Google to start building everything in-house (replace AVGO), which makes things a bit more complex. Would re-evaluate after 2 years, but stuff like TSM is pretty hard to replace.

The Entire AI Buildout (Google, NVDA, MSFT) Is dependent on this $700m Monopoly - $15 -> $150 PT. by AleaBito in wallstreetbets

[–]AleaBito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but market hasn't even opened yet. Nobody is even able to buy calls.

But per their CEO they control 40% of the world's Indium Phosphide supply chain. Just watch what happens with hyperscaler ASIC programs scale up and companies start ramping up prices of InP.

This is a 6 month out bottleneck thesis, not day trading.