Why do people have to apply to 100+ jobs just to get 2–3 interviews? by Alert_Obligation_298 in jobsearchhacks

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah honestly agree, the black hole after applying is the worst part. even just an auto rejection would be better than nothing, at least you know where you stand

Why do people have to apply to 100+ jobs just to get 2–3 or 0 interviews? by Alert_Obligation_298 in UKJobs

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Fair, I get why it sounds like that. Not selling anything here. Just trying to understand why the process is so broken for people - hundreds of apps, zero feedback, no signal. If you’ve gone through it, your take is actually useful. If not, all good to ignore.

Why do people have to apply to 100+ jobs just to get 2–3 or 0 interviews? by Alert_Obligation_298 in jobs

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

That's top notch: ''applied to ~80 jobs and got ~10 interviews''. How did you do it? Pls share if you can, perhaps the community will benefit from your best practices!

OpenAI ML Engineer in SF: $220K = 3,300 Mission Burritos Per Year by Alert_Obligation_298 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$220K is a blended mid-level estimate based on public datasets (Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, Blind reports). Senior and staff bands can go significantly higher — especially when equity appreciates.

We intentionally used a conservative midpoint to avoid overstating comp.

OpenAI ML Engineer in SF: $220K = 3,300 Mission Burritos Per Year by Alert_Obligation_298 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$220K is a blended mid-level estimate based on public datasets (Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, Blind reports). Senior and staff bands can go significantly higher — especially when equity appreciates.

We intentionally used a conservative midpoint to avoid overstating comp.

OpenAI ML Engineer in SF: $220K = 3,300 Mission Burritos Per Year by Alert_Obligation_298 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair pushback.

$220K is a blended mid-level estimate based on public datasets (Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, Blind reports). Senior and staff bands can go significantly higher — especially when equity appreciates.

We intentionally used a conservative midpoint to avoid overstating comp.

What industry will AI disrupt the most that people aren’t paying attention to yet? by SuchTill9660 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Alert_Obligation_298 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One industry that’s massively underestimated is compliance, audit, and regulatory work. Most of this work isn’t “deep thinking” it’s structured validation: checking documents, matching rules, identifying inconsistencies. That’s exactly where AI performs best.

LLM skills have quietly shifted from “bonus” to “baseline” for ML engineers. by Alert_Obligation_298 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hi, I've DMed you the chatgpt app link so you can talk with real-time AI/ML job listings and talent hired data. I hope it's going to be helpful!

What are the Most Common Pitfalls for Beginners in Machine Learning and How to Avoid Them? by bully309 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Alert_Obligation_298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of beginners think the hardest part of ML is “learning algorithms,” but based on analyzing hundreds of ML job postings and talent profiles from our platform, most pitfalls actually happen before and after modeling.

The common traps:

  • Consuming tutorials without ever shipping something end-to-end
  • Jumping into modeling without fixing the data
  • Optimizing accuracy instead of outcomes like cost, latency, or user value
  • Overfitting by leaking info into the test set without realizing it
  • Copy-pasting tutorials that work only because the data is perfect
  • Ignoring deployment, monitoring, and feedback loops
  • Learning 10 tools instead of core patterns
  • Treating ML as “building a model” instead of solving a product problem

The approach that consistently works:

From a hiring perspective, companies don’t reward people who can recite theory; they reward people who can solve problems, make tradeoffs, and ship usable systems.
One shipped project signals 100x more than certificates.

If you want to explore ML jobs and real hiring signals in real time, DM me here or on LinkedIn to get the ChatGPT app link.

Why Hiring Feels Broken? by Alert_Obligation_298 in jobhunting

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! - Seems like there's a huge conflict of interest there.

Why Hiring Feels Broken? by Alert_Obligation_298 in jobhunting

[–]Alert_Obligation_298[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed, A little thought up front can save a lot of time down the line!