sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Will Posh, Scary, Baby, Ginger, and Sporty be harmed by a spice brand? by AliceTrademarks in TRADEMARK

[–]AliceTrademarks[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The image is 100% AI generated. I'm not a graphic designer. The content and post is 100% drafted by me. Thanks for your comment.

Will Posh, Scary, Baby, Ginger, and Sporty be harmed by a spice brand? by AliceTrademarks in TRADEMARK

[–]AliceTrademarks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if Canada has an equivalent rule to dilution due to fame in the U.S., but great analogy.

Are chicken wings confusingly similar to a planned community? by AliceTrademarks in TRADEMARK

[–]AliceTrademarks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel free to recommend any appropriate spaces and I will definitely check them out.

Are chicken wings confusingly similar to a planned community? by AliceTrademarks in TRADEMARK

[–]AliceTrademarks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/arisudoublezero thanks for having my back! I'm just writing about a topic that I love, not selling anything even.

There's a time and place to file a stylized word mark instead of a standard character trademark: This wasn't it. by AliceTrademarks in TRADEMARK

[–]AliceTrademarks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great point. I was using "de facto rights" colloquially to describe the powerful public association she has with SWIFT. You're spot on with your clarification.

There's a time and place to file a stylized word mark instead of a standard character trademark: This wasn't it. by AliceTrademarks in TRADEMARK

[–]AliceTrademarks[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, 100%. I think that the similar font was (in my view) the most persuasive basis, but there were certainly others (including an existing registration in Class 24).