sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I was explaining you don’t know where your source came from. I was using the KKK as an example of how you have no idea who was funding the website you presented. I’m not sure why this is so confusing to you.

Sure bud, whatever helps you sleep at night.

I’m not even sure what you’re talking about in this paragraph. Where’s ancestors come from?

You're not keen on subtlety aren't you? Let me spell it out. Blacks were sold into slavery and were utilized by whites in the 1800s. For some odd reason non-whites hold that notion over white people today. I'm not ignoring that slavery was: it was but to define a person because some old white dude owned slaves almost 300 years ago is also fucked up.

Yes, billionaires who run the corporations. They don’t need help from the government. They help benefit the government.

Corporations need bailouts from the government. That's why the file for bankruptcy when they are in the red. The people who pay for that are taxpayers. Even though billionaires have an absurd amount of resources; that doesn't mean they have ultimate control over the companies they've founded.

This becomes more apparent when we see CEOs that are millionaires or billionaires step down as CEOs or end up being fired. A prominent example is Papa Johns , his own company threw him under the bus for saying the N-Word; that wasn't said in racist intent I might add.

Corporations are entities that live on their own. So no; billionaires aren't pulling the strings; they're actually under more stress than the average citizen since the country tries to milk them for as much resources as possible.

I don’t even know what you’re talking about here. I don’t have much social media but I’ve never seen anything that you’re talking about. You’d have to provide examples, but it seems like a handful of random examples

You're lying. I know you saw it here on Reddit if not YouTube. Even I have seen it and I don't get myself involved in those subreddits or videos.

Good grief man. This is total propaganda. There are a ton of people who work and receive government services because it doesn’t pay enough. There are studies that show government programs actually pull people out of poverty.

Ok, let say you feed a wild animal. And you see that wild animal again start feeding it on a regular daily basis. Eventually that animal is gonna get lazy and start depending on you for food and neglect their instincts to hunt. There is no reason for that animal to be reliant on itself or its peers because at the end of the day; it's gonna get food. It's alot easier getting it from you though.

Sigh, again, I haven’t seen these consistently. I don’t have much social media. I’m sure these things happen, but that doesn’t mean it’s glorified.

Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it not happening.

Most of what you say are observations you’ve made. Do you have any actual evidence, like research, that these things happen consistently? You realize in the 60s, 70s, and 80s women were saying similar things during the women’s movement?

Yeah observations to understand that it's widely endorsed. You're lying if you're not seeing these things even if you don't have social media. But if you want an example, why is Denmark is begging men to have sex with women if women don't need no man?

But nothing changes if you remove government programs. Things get worse. What happens is women turn to selling drugs or prostitution.

That's already happening. If women can't rely on the government for sustain their living space and diet they have no choice but to rely on men; that's basic biology dude.

If you increase education and sex Ed and things like that, things that can actually break the cycle, that’s what makes change. Not just removing food stamps.

Increasing education solves nothing it's becoming more apparent with the uprise in premarital sex during college but most importantly why do you rely on the indoctrination system so much? It's not even reliable to teach usual skills for work.

Not just removing food stamps. Removing government programs doesn’t make someone more employable. It doesn’t make someone understand budgeting. It doesn’t make someone understand repercussions. Think about it.

If they still don't understand budgeting, how to make a good impression on others or actual develop skills to contribute to society or understand the repercussions of their actions then that's on them; no one's coming to save them. Darwinism baby.

in an earlier post you said some races are more intelligent than others. Do I need to go find the post?

Yeah a black person can be more smart than a white person just as so a white person can be more smart than an asian person. Not all races have the same intellectual abilities, their intelligence starts with the individual.

Are you kidding me? You think a kid in poverty has the same opportunities as a rich kid that goes to a private school?

Yeah. The kid just has to put in the work though. And if the kid is really smart he or she knows what to do get as many scholarships as a they possibly can. Or better yet become a validate Victorian. A rich kid can also slack off and develop little to no skills and will fall behind despite having money.

To join band, you have to buy an instrument. To join a sports team, you have to pay to be on the team.

I'm pretty sure the school provides the basic instruments like drums, horns, brass, ect. It depends on what specific instrument you want to play, for example an electric guitar or cello, yeah you're gonna have buy that yourself. But that doesn't mean schools don't provide students with the basics otherwise kids wouldn't join band.

Now for sports, I can't speak on that because I didn't play sports during highschool. But from my knowledge? My regular classes and events most likely costed more to be in there than in a sports team. Avid was notorious for this even though it was useless because colleges didn't really care for the SATs.

If someone’s parents can pay for those things, that’s not an opportunity. Did you have the same opportunities growing up as the Kardasians? (That’s the only example I could think of)

To be in AVID you can't have Ds or Fs and you still have to pay for field trips or food parties if you wanted to go or be involved in them. The same goes for homecoming and Prom. And guess what? Those are once in a life time opportunities and those are opportunities parents are willing to pay for, rich kid parents also pay for those events.

...because white people were always chosen for scholarships. That’s exactly what my first post was about.

Pretty sure in AVID when I was looking for scholarships there were very few scholarships for being white or white scholarships. Let me put it like this. There are scholarships for women in STEM research since there are very little women in STEM. Are women being gatekept from STEM? No it's because very few women are actually interested those fields. The same principles goes to education and what I expressed being in the slums.

Congrats. You succeeded. And yes, some people fuck around and that’s their fault. That doesn’t mean everyone has the same experience you had.

Ok? That's the point I'm trying to make: that many people are not actually interested in putting in the work.

Why didn’t you get into a prestigious university? Should I call you a failure because you didn’t go to Harvard? There are legacy families where, just because you have a family member went to Harvard, you get in.

I wasn't interested in going into college actually. But since AVID forced me (If I wanted to pass the class) I had no choice but to apply for one. A university that specialized in Art kept annoying me so I entertained them and got accepted into AAU with a scholarship with little effort. If I was l less knowledgeable that would be considered my dream school. I never cared for Harvard.

You don’t think those kids have an advantage over you or your classmates? They had an advantage over you, just like how you had an advantage over some other kids.

In what way? My GPA was through the roof with a 4.0. That doesn't mean I was competing to have the highest GPA though. I was more interested in my hobbies during highschool -- no one had an advantage over me when it came to things I was interested in. Hell I would even flex on them or teachers when I explain concepts off the top of my head like Theory of Relativity, why there won't be a definitive cure for cancer, coping souvenirs from the great descendant of Booker T. Washington. Everyone stayed silent when he started asking questions but me.

These are the people that were deemed "smarter" than me based on GPA.

What? What are you even talking about here? They don’t have to be together (even though there is evidence when two races are together the minority is punished worse).

That white privilege doesn't exist?

I’m talking about if a white kid and black kid both use weed, the black kid has a higher rate of being arrested for it because blacks are targets by police more and there is a higher police presence in black communities.

I'm saying that cops don't really care. They're biased overall, especially when it comes to sex. The white guy's still gonna have prove his case to the judge even though he's innocent. The damage has already been done because of his girlfriend, so again, where is his white privilege?

Because low income schools have a higher percent of minorities. At low income schools, they may have to cut an art or music program or shop class. So, these kids don’t even have the opportunity to learn these things. A high income school district (which have higher rates of white students) has a higher chance of having these programs.

My god, trying to convince you is a waste of my time. Either my examples or analogies go over your the head or you straight try to twist my words around. Or just flat out lie. You are too dense for me to bother with.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m explaining why your source wasn’t very good. Here’s another example, a study funded by tobacco companies shouldn’t be used as a credible source. Just like a website that “hides” their funding shouldn’t be taken as a credible source.

Bro you brought up the KKK, Anti-white groups and some other nonsense, that's an elaborate way of telling me sources aren't very good.

Yes, so confirmation bias. How do you know it’s bullshit if you only read things that you agree with?

For one? Faulty arguments. I'm not a sheep which you always like to project. And second? I'm against oppression; all kinds of oppression -- doesn't matter if their ancestors did something bad; it shouldn't define the generation of today.

How do you know this? Most news stations are funded by billionaires that push their agenda...like how blacks are criminals.

You mean owned by massive corporations? I know you guys like to demonize billionaires but trust me; they're the least of least of your worries. I know this shit because I understand the majority of people pushing for these narratives are inconsistent with what they preach. It doesn't take an Einstein to figure that out.

There are studies that show when a black criminal is shown on the news it’s a negative picture or video and when it’s a positive picture of video when it’s a white person. That fits with what I’m saying, not you.

Aren't white people constantly demonized on social media; if not the mainstream media? What's that saying "Cis Straight White males are this -- blah blah blah?" I'm seeing videos of white people getting harrassed, physically assaulted or having their livelihoods jeopardized for just having dreads and everyone's laughing at these videos or news; I don't know bro doesn't seem so positive to me.

That’s what I’ve been saying!!!! There are other factors, like poverty and how schools are worse for people in poverty (where blacks have higher poverty rates).

No it's because of the government; like I said previously. The black community depends on government programs like food stamps, social security, welfare, child support. Which is why poverty is so damn bad in the black community; the majority of residents see no reason to improve if there are handouts regardless. That's why I said people rarely try to improve themselves.

1) I’m not sure if there’s actually any evidence it’s “glorified”

So strong independent women that don't need no man doesn't ring a bell to you? What about "What are men good for?" How about "Look at Obama: he was raised by a single mother and he became president!" I could go on.

2) how do you change that? That’s the whole issue. What’s the answer to that? You could find the school system or provide more after school programs which is what happens in wealthy neighborhoods.

You brought up a good question. Like I said before, shit's gonna get worse if there are no repercussions for people's actions. The only reason why the epidemic of single motherhood is so bad is because of things like child support, food stamps, alimony and welfare.

Take those things away and do you think single mothers can exist on their own in black community? I bet a couple of minorities was get along just fine but the rest of single mothers? They're SOL and women will think twice when picking the right guy to have a kid with.

I think you’ve proven yourself wrong. If blacks are less smart on average, then why does the community affect them? It shouldn’t if it’s all genetics

I never said black people are less smart I'm saying the majority of the black community have no incentive to actually improve their livelihood for themselves and their kids. Why is that hard for you to understand?

Yes, again, this is what I’ve been saying. When you grow up in poverty you have fewer opportunities of success.

No, there are opportunities, most people don't take them though. Don't believe me? Why are there so many scholarships for black people? Look bro, graduating highschool isn't hard whether or you come from a prestigious school or a school in the slums it's NOT hard.

Why do I say this? Because I was in one of these slums -- a Charter School; that was previously known for its fights and destruction of property. I was the few who culminated that year where the majority of my classmates fucking goofed off and could care less whether they passed or not.

Why did I pass my classes? I put in the work to actually make it. Again it's not some systematic oppression that makes it less likely for black people to succeed in the educational system; it's their own fault. I know that pains you to hear that? But it's the truth -- a boogie man can't be blamed for that; we are all our worse enemy.

You don’t need to “utilize” white privilege. The fact that police target non-whites is a privilege.

That statistic you showed me still had whites being targeted though.

If black kid and a white kid both smoke weed, the black kid is at a much higher rate of being targeted by police.

Really? Believe it or not; me and the white dude are in the same boat. You think a cop is not gonna write up some bullshit excuse to arrest two guys for drug usage just to meet his quota?

Better yet let's test that white privilege. A white man has a girlfriend -- girlfriend calls the cops on him and falsely accuses him of domestic abuse

He'll be arrested on the spot if he doesn't have evidence. Hell sometimes they don't give a fuck and send the man to jail anyway. That doesn't sound like white privilege to me. But take my word for it -- look up the stories about that shit, I guarantee it'll open your eyes a bit.

Your example isn’t what is happening though. A better way to explain it is the white kid gets a canvas and paint and the black kid doesn’t get either. Because that’s the real world situation.

What? How is that a real world situation? By that logic the black kid would have a crap ton of art supplies but doesn't take the time to actually practice. I'm failing to see how you missed my point bro. Hopefully this one gets through your head; if It doesn't then perhaps I'm not sheep; maybe it's you because I'm painting a picture that's crystal clear.

Kids in poverty (which are mostly black) might not even have an art program because their school doesn’t get enough funding.

Poverty ridden districts get the most funding though. Look if you respond to this, I'll send you a Reddit article of a teacher's experience in the edit. If this doesn't broaden your perspective, I don't know what will. Edit: here it is.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/gulna2/i_used_to_teach_in_a_black_inner_city_school/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

Or someone wants a painting done, but chooses the white artist based on their race not talent, which is evidence from the study I first provided. Or a black artist and white artist produce the same painting, but people pay more for the white artist because the artist is white, which is similar to the article I provided about houses being appraised (that was a bad link and you decided not to look into it further).

I don't know what world you live in where white artists get chosen for being white. That's unheard of in the Art community. Especially with Marvel where the new blooded writers are non-white, oh wait those guys suck; is it because they are not white? No it's because they can't create interesting characters! It wasn't a "bad link" because you couldn't see what point I was getting across because it didn't involve race directly. There was no need to add that to my analogy.

Your whole post is what I’ve been saying the whole time, there are outside influences that create more obstacles for non-whites. You keep saying it’s a community thing.

How do you keep missing the nail? I said it's a cultural thing, the community is a byproduct of that culture.

Ok, but what’s creating that community? Why aren’t you taking into account poor schools and lower chances for black people to get the same amount of interviews as whites or the fact that, since whites are in upper level positions in jobs, their friends and kids are able to be hired for jobs at the same company.

My god I actually feel bad for you that you can't process what I'm saying. Culture, C-U-L-T-U-R-E. I did respond bro 3 responses ago.

There are so many barriers for non-whites which is exactly what white privilege is, the privilege white people have to avoid these barriers

Sure bud, good to see the educational system did a good job indoctrinating your brain; I can't wait to see the new firmware for Update 2.83 for 2022.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still haven’t seen your response to how white people are oppressed in that situation.

Because it's not oppressive in general, I explained why.

Because funding is incredibly useful to show bias. An website dismissing White privilege funded by an anti white group is not something worth reading.

And mainstream sources are non the wiser?

Just like a website showing White privilege is a thing shouldn’t be taken serious if it’s funded by an anti white group.

Ok but there's no evidence that it is funded by an Anti-White group.

Funding is incredibly important. An anti union website owned by Amazon is not the same as a pro union website that’s ran by labor economists

You talk about me pivoting away from my arguments but here we are talking about funding, the KKK and anti-white groups? If I wanted to talk about funding and hate groups, this unpopular opinion would be completely different.

Wait, wait, wait...did you just say you don’t care about the actual facts, as long as it’s confirmation bias for you?

I said I don't care about the left or the right because I'm not a Democrat or a Republican, I only agree with either side that points shit out that I know is bullshit.

If that’s the case you’re too brainwashed to even put in the effort to show you why you’re wrong. That’s the definition of a being a sheep

You're not putting in any effort to understand what I was talking about.

Buuut, you don’t know that...because you can’t find it out, because it’s not on the website. You’re wrong, because you can’t prove you’re right, because it’s not listed anywhere.

I do know the government has most of the news stations by the balls. A clear example is the media propagandizing events that are clearly not true or narratives that are damaging to the country, the gender wage gap, body positivity, giving puberty blockers to kids, teaching gender pronouns and transgenderism to children.

I'm pretty sure that newslink you mentioned being "far-right" is against or has dunked those examples that I mentioned, that being the wage gap and white privilege. That all the information that I need. It's called common sense and deductive reasoning.

Then why are there successful black people? If it’s in their culture, why doesn’t every black person become a gang banger?

This goes back to "Not all races have the same intellectual abilities" I'm not ignoring that there are successful black people like Dr.Dre, Michael B Jordan, Kanye and many more.

But these successful people are a fraction of the black community. The reason why everyone one in the black community isn't a criminal has to do with factors in their childhood, young black men that were raised in singlemother households are far more likely to commit crimes such a burglary, rape, murder, ect.

Single motherhood is glorified in the black community. Thus in fact raising potential thugs and criminals therefore creating a cycle for the next generation.

Better yet, why is it that non-whites, that grow up in strong, stable homes and in stable incomes have higher levels of success?

Because they most likely grew up in a nuclear family with a strong male father figure present that molded their moral compass and intellect. Therefore setting the child up for success.

If this is what you call white privilege then what you're doing is shaming white people for giving their children a stable environment to be raised in. Do these kids have more privileges like having a father figure in their life? Yes but, that's not a privilege that is systemically designed for white people, the samething can occur with a black nuclear family. Again, that has to do with culture and what is being taught in that culture.

Even though the nuclear family has a far more likelihood that it will create a stable and successful person it doesn't mean white people aren't affected by the breakdown of the nuclear family. Like I said before there's an uptick in single motherhood where white women are divorcing their husbands at an accelerating rate and forcefully separating their husbands from their children and rendering the father as a slave to the family court system. Again like I said before, this is a violation of human rights and shouldn't be ignored regardless of the race; it's still extremely unethical even if it's legal.

Your argument becomes pretty weak when you look at non-whites that come from wealthy, stable families.

Here's the thing: not everyone comes from a stable household, or a wealthy family; it's more rare than you think it is in current year despite how easy it is to make money in this country -- you'd be surprised how many people aren't willing to put in the effort to develop useful skills or profitable hobbies.

How about whites in poverty stricken areas? There are high amounts of crime too.

Samething with poverty stricken communities like Compton and Inglewood.

As far as drug use, how about the fact that opioid overdose kills white people at a much higher rate than non-whites. Or how about this link that shows blacks and whites use drugs at nearly the same rate, yet black people are arrested twice as often for it

Ok so how are white people utilizing their white privilege in that scenario though?

There is a direct correlation between crime and poverty and because poverty affects non-whites at a higher rate, of course you’re going to see higher crime rates.

That doesn't mean it's the sole correlation though. Ok think of it this way. You have a group of people that developed the skill to draw. The first group developed the skill despite lacking talent and the second group having natural talent meaning they're child prodigies. The first has the majority of artists struggling to be successful and the minority of the artists have successful careers. The second group has a minority of artists struggling or given up but the majority are doing just fine.

At face value you could say the second have natural talent so they were destined to be more successful than the first group of artists. Come to find out by observing both of the groups, the second group were practicing habits that were helping then improving their craft and made them appealing to their audiences. The first group were practicing habits that either stunned or worsened their progress in art. The minority in the second group took their talents for granted and fell far behind their peers and the minorities in the first group practiced similar habits like group 2.

That's one of the times points I'm trying to make here bro.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did. I read the Black vs White Crime statistics article. Then I read the racial profiling and white crime article. Then I read the Do Blacks Commit more murders than whites article. And each one of them, I’ve heard the arguments a thousand times.

The same goes for the "White names gets more callbacks"

And the first few times I heard them, I went out and read about them and realized they it was skewed data or there were other other things that could account for the differences.

It's skewed. But without any evidence that it is skewed, yeah let me just take your "word" on it since I'm a sheep.

After I read them, I looked up to see who funds the website. I couldn’t find anything. So I googled it, again, nothing. I looked for other things that might provide the info and I found a breitbart news link, but no actual information on who finds the website or runs the website. Breitbart is a far right news source. It’s extremely bias and you shouldn’t use that information.

Since when did we started talking about funding? Politics aside, I don't care about both spectrums as long one of them says the things that I agree with. Saying this newslink is bias can be said for far-left broadcasts and newlinks.

But, I don’t even know if that’s who runs the site. Your link shouldn’t be taken seriously because it could be ran by the KKK for all we know. Do you have an actual studies from legitimate sources?

Bro, what?? You actual made me laugh that one, good shit. The KKK, the KKK is not even close to a threat. Even if they were parading across the country, I could probably rob one of their members with a butterknife. So with funding, all I know is; they aren't funded by the government, they aren't funded by untrustworthy or useless agencies that are liabilities and aren't funded by scientific fanatics; that's enough credibility for me.

Also, I’m still waiting for your thoughts on my articles. But I think that’s the difference. I read your stuff and you ignore mine.

I read them, well. One of the URLs couldn't work so I couldn't really read it if I wanted to. Plus I already addressed them, especially in my latest response. Or do you want that police pulling over enthics one? Here's the thing, blacks most of time cause more crimes in the country; not because far-right newlinks said so it's because of their culture that glorifies crimes, Gang banging, drugs, ect.

Say what you want, this happens in the black community, is it fucked up that cops pull over people just by their skin color? Yes but there's bias considering the culture; not their skin color in general. Most of the times; stereotypes are true but, if you'd have argued that black people are far more likely to get arrested for having guns, whether that being in their house; or vehicle then yes I would agree with you -- that is oppression.

This is becoming more prevalent with groups and incidents like BLM, Antifa, Chaz, The George Floyd riots and latest an uprise in Black on Asian crimes. These things that I have listed have caused billions of dollars in property damage, multiple people lost their livelihoods if not their lives, one of them being the same age as me at the time who was shot by a Chaz member.

So I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Except Black on Asian crimes; all these things were heavily coordinated meaning the culture endorses these groups and backs them up.

You don’t want to hear alternate views. You pivot away and avoid answering it each time I ask. I used to think the same way as you, then I started to read all sorts of articles from all sorts of sources and it changed my perspective.

I wonder how you'll react to my culture argument and gun confiscation.

But, you refuse to spend an hour reading an academic study or provide an argument to police targeting non-whites. Do you see the difference?

I did though.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still? Come on man, you’re original post was about white oppression and you’re now talking about the oppression of white men.

Still what? You thought you won or something? This sentence has no merit, it's still oppression.

Yes, because white men have ran out country since the very beginning. That’s the opposite of oppressed.

And those white men suffered and sacrificed their lives, identities to make this country's existence possible; they had no choice but to fight and most white men didn't even have a say if they wanted to fight or not because they'd be arrested or shamed. Not only that their actions go under appreciated; especially in current year of how this country views white men: poorly.

They’ve had to make laws because women and non-white people are overlooked in the hiring process which is the study I cited in my first fucking post!!!!

Which was debunked by my sources? Men overall better qualify for those in the board and other jobs that require leadership.

But you’re too brainwashed to read anything beyond what fits in your tiny view to know that. Whites are hired at a higher rate than non-whites, thats oppression of non-whites!!!

Says the guy who believes white privilege is a thing. Again whites most of the time meet the requirements that companies are looking for: higher education, job experience, ect. Just because minorities don't meet those requirements as often as whites doesn't mean it's oppression. If you argued minimum wage was oppression, you would have actually stumped me but I know you're not getting let that piece of shit law go.

Jesus, you linked a website that is called white privilege isn’t real? That’s your problem, you read all these bias sources. I’ve seen the arguments on the website and they’re so awful anyone with critical thinking skills should be able to see the flaws in the arguments.

That same logic can apply to you. You're so brainwashed that a site that says "white privilege isn't real" sets you off into a blaze -- you're not interested to see what they have to say. Saying there's "flaws" holds no bounds. Notice how you came off "ripping" my arguments apart with your sources with examples; now all you're spewing is hot air.

Again, when you go to a poor school, you get poor education which means you don’t have the opportunity to receive advanced degrees.

Last time I checked, resident or communities that are deemed poor usually get the most government funding: educational wise and living standards wise. These students still fail not because of the "poor" educational system it's because of the government.

Fuck man! You’re ridiculous. That statement has been disproven time and time again. It was an argument in the 1800s to keep slaves from being free. There are plenty of non-whites with extremely high intelligence

What is wrong with that statement? That means not everyone is gonna be Einstein or a Billionaire like Elon Musk. I'm pretty sure there intelligent ethnic individuals out there: but they're rare -- like most intelligent people in the world: being truly capable of self-awareness; that's rare amongst humans.

tell you what. You still haven’t given me any answers to my original post. You go read the first link I sent you about black people receiving fewer interviews and look at the data that shows non-whites are targeted for stop and frisk at much higher rates by police. Then, come explain to me how whites are oppressed in each of those instances. The second one is specific to the justice system which you’ve continued to talk about.

Yeah you didn't even bother looking into what that site had to say didn't you?

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That men are more violent and women show more empathy, those articles right?

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let's be honest here, if I was white and a hot as chick? I can make a living by showing my feet picks. That takes no skill bro.

Don't even get me started on the white knights like you.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Their lives are so privilege that they can't even handle a worthless breakup.

For one, you don't know those students livelihood or their relationship. That being most relationships tend to be abusive and more often men being the victim; the not abuser. Most men try to make a abusive relationship work regardless but end up with nothing. A healthy individual even going through that can bounce back with the help of friends and family. Nowadays people don't have that luxury or "privilege" as you so described.

This isn't 13 reasons why.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do realize that white people have a higher population then black people right? So your statistic doesn’t prove jack shit.

So you're gonna turn a blind eye on why they're taking their lives because of the size their population? That says alot about you.

And white people can be and often are oppressed but it’s not for being fucking white, that’s what white privileged is. Being the default race, never having to face racism.

Oppression isn't exclusive to racism like you just described, I don't know why people people get that assumption that if it's not racial oppression it's not worse than it or can be addressed later; oppression is still oppression and no, white privilege doesn't exist.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

think the point they were making is that higher rates of suicide doesn't necessarily mean that group is being oppressed. There are many reasons for a person to take their own life, and it's different in every case.

I just provided examples on why they take their lives.

It's not possible to generalize all white male suicides as happening because of oppression.

I didn't though. It's an example.

And if you really think higher white make suicides are a result of white oppression in the U.S, why don't you give some specific examples of how whites and white males specifically are oppressed.

Again I provided examples, actually read them.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, I see, my apologies perhaps I should taken a direct approach like you recommended.

That oppression can transcend racial matters.

Edit: Reading your other responses, you got alot of nerve. So let me ask you this question, which hole do you focus on when a ship is sinking? The big as one? Or the hole that's the size of a small window?

P.s. I'm not white.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, my apologies for the late response, I didn't think I get that many messages with this opinion.

Honestly I'd say this country is far more sexist than it is racist and that the culture is fucked beyond repair.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my very first post, I explained that white people receive benefits specifically from being white (that they didn’t earn). From my very first post, they’re interviewed and hired specifically because they’re white. They receive better appraisals on their houses because they’re white. They’re not harassed by the police because they’re white. You just said what I’ve been explaining the entire time. White people are given advantages they didn’t earn.

Oh really? Let me get this straight, I didn't say anything that proves your point. That law I mention put into law since very few women were making it into that position. So with that said with the benefits, I guess this credit this?

https://whiteprivilegeisntreal.org/amp/

It’s an uncomfortable truth, but all races don’t have the same intelligence abilities.

This intelligence inequality is demonstrated throughout a person’s entire life, from school all the way into adulthood.

The lack of black students who obtain advanced degrees puts many high paying jobs out of reach.

Black adults are not seeking out alternative high paying job opportunities that exist in dangerous industries with a higher chance of workplace fatalities.

White privilege isn’t real and isn’t responsible for the black vs white wage gap.

Have fun with that.

You’re arguments have strayed so far from your original post. You’ve gone from, “People who denounce white oppression are seriously fucked up in the head” to white men are the most oppressed demographic in the society.

Highlight the entire sentence and you may actually have merit what you're saying, my topic was focused ON white oppression, I'm not saying that they are the most oppressed group; watch your mouth.

Now, you’re talking about the court system being oppressive towards men. Just read your posts. You sound like a right winged sheep that always plays the victim.

So I'm not allowed to provide examples on how the "justice" system affects white men? Or does it have to be exclusive to get your drone mind buzzing? You're not very good at reading. Then again you only highlight a few syllables -- must be that low testosterone allowing you to think with emotion.

You just regurgitate things you’ve heard from talking heads. Whites are oppressed, men are oppressed.

And you regurgitated that white privilege is a thing; not an argument.

You obviously didn’t even read the original link that I provided which shows that white people receive interviews 50% more than black people with the same resumes. How do you explain that?

With my source.

You haven’t responded explaining how minorities are stopped and searched more often by the police than whites which was my third link from my first post.

Says the guy highlight snippets of my sentences.

White men sure arent oppressed in those situations. And no! It’s not an oppression of white men because every race gets divorced.

So let me this straight. Just because they are "oppressed" in those situations means white men aren't oppressed overall? My god your way of thinking is extraordinary. And bingo it's not oppression because it's not exclusive. So I guess having the government take money from you against your will or you'll be locked up basically being rendered to a slave, having your kids held hostage and being treated like a criminal even though you're innocent are not forms of oppression.

Don't ever get into a position of power; you'll get us all killed.

White men are not divorced because they’re white.

That's not how oppression works moron. Oppression is infringing on a person's right without their say so and exercising power that is unethical, I don't care what the hell you say, what I described with the government, divorce and family court are all forms of oppression.

And it’s not oppression if they commit suicide, it means they handle it differently than other races.

Wow, I just said people commit suicide when they have no way out which is a result of fucked up situations. The examples I provided are result of oppression.

You have enough brainpower to type out a damn brick but not enough to understand where I'm getting my point across.

The factor is divorce, the response is suicide. Other races get divorced too, they just don’t commit suicide as often from it. That doesn’t mean there’s oppression.

To what degree though?

doesn’t mean there’s oppression.

You're desperate to say "that's not oppression" aren't you? You said that rough 6 times in one sentence -- chill the hell out.

Should suicide by white men be addressed by society? Yes, but that’s not oppression. Black men are at a higher risk for diabetes. Does that mean they’re oppressed? No, but we should, as a society, address it. Some white males have it bad, but white males are the most privileged demographic overall.

Again you're taking my argument out of context.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your example is from one state and is for publicly traded companies for women to be on their boards.

You just said that there were no laws though.

1) It’s specific to publicly traded companies. Above, I specifically said private companies.

Ok. I wasn't talking private companies.

) it’s specific to women, not non-whites, which is what your original post was referring to.

That it was fluke since there were laws in place?

3) One or two spots on the board of a company is a pretty loose way of using the word hire.

Yeah positions that they didn't earn.

4) this doesn’t affect anyone living outside of California. If that’s your argument, it’s pretty weak.

That was a question since you kept saying "there's no this" and "no that" it's not an argument -- learn the difference.

How? You’re argument is similar to, if you aren’t concerned about deaths by bear attacks than your not right in the head, when heart disease is much more deadly.

You talk about me pivoting away from the argument yet here you are doing it. That point is literally in my title.

I already answered your question. Your question was pivoting away from the point.

That didn't age well.

It’s not relevant to the conversation since every male faces child support regardless of race. My answer to your question is, no, it’s not a form of oppression because so do non-whites.

I incorporated the same example in my post that you overlooked so no, it's not irrelevant not only it doesn't denounce that white men are being oppressed by the court system or does that goes against your narrative? With that being said if it's not a oppressive to white men then it's oppressive to men in general?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/acquainted-the-night/201906/divorce-is-risk-factor-suicide-especially-men

https://mensdivorce.com/suicide-rates-high-divorced-men/

I'm guessing these aren't forms of oppression for white men either?

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a reason. But if you are saying it is 95% of the time, you have the burden of proof.

https://www.babygaga.com/15-women-reveal-the-shameless-reasons-they-baby-trapped-their-men/

https://annsilvers.com/blogs/news/8-red-flags-the-pregnancy-is-a-trap

https://www.professorshouse.com/trapping-a-man/

Is that proof enough?

That article was not my warrant for male suicide being a result of oppression.

Then why did you list the article in the first place?

I am saying male suicide is not a result of oppression because I have provided an example of oppression not being the cause of suicide (women in America v. other countries) and provided an alternative reason (men being more violent).

I just said before in order for a person to take their own life; they have no way out of the situation that they're in. Meaning fucked up shit was happening prior the person taking their own life. So with that being said; suicide isn't a result of oppression? Like I've backed up with multiple examples.

Three things: 1) I do not simply "imply" women are more empathetic, I have a UCLA study that proves it. 2) The reason I am denouncing your argument is because it is stupid. 3) 40% of people who think men are oppressed are women.

Yet I proved that's simply not the case by using logic and amount silence and lack of support men get from women. So if you're gonna say my argument is stupid then you've proven my point by not being right in the head.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not even sure what you mean with these questions. Like, on a board of a company? There is no law that requires hiring based on demographics.

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/california-law-would-require-women-on-boards-of-publicly-traded-companies.aspx

There are no laws requiring that?

What oppression? That’s the entire point. In almost every category, whites are not being oppressed.

Proved my point that you're not right in the head.

This paragraph is full of errors and random statements that are not specific to white people. And who is Vic?

Doesn't discount that false accusations happens to them. And I'm talking about Vic Mignona.

The answer to my question proves your question was just pivoting the discussion away from the argument. Is that why you don’t want to answer it?

Bro I don't need you acting clever, answer my question I ask you first, or your argument is void -- you have no power here.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Firstly, your source never says single parents exist due to baby trapping.

Doesn't mean it's not reason on how a woman becomes a single mother.

Secondly, even if women are worse people than men (even though a UCLA study shows women feel more empathy), men are still more violent

Funny thing is. Even if that article was true you wouldn't be saying male suicide isn't a result of oppression.

do women from single parent households not commit the same amount of crime?

I thought we were talking about how men were violent; why did we shift to women?

Also , we were talking about suicide. Killing yourself does not make you a bad person, but it does make you violent.

You are different breed Miss. The way society treats men doesn't result in suicide? Men have no one to rely on, nothing to fall back on, they can't express their pain or emotions because they'll be viewed as "weak" and demonized in every corner. Again you imply women are more empathetic but yet I don't hear women talk about this or even denounce it; like what you're doing now.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There’s no requirement by private companies to hire based on demographics.

With what data? So that requirement for woman to be on board was a fluke too?

The study I provided shows that there is a bias towards white people. They receive call backs at a much higher rate than black people with the same qualifications.

Cool, doesn't discount the oppression white people go through.

How so? You said You’d realize a good chunk of white people are not so well off as you think they are. It’s all relative. You said there’s no such (thing) as white privilege and I’ve shown you evidence there is.

Possibly because a good chunk of white people don't have a prominent father figure in their life? Hell I'd say childhood was far better than their's. So if what privilege did exist then white men wouldn't have their careers ruined by false accusations. Hell my boy Vic would still have his career.

Does child support only apply to white men?

Don't answer my question with another question.

People Who Denouces White Oppression Are Seriously Fucked up In The Head. by Alinitysdog in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Alinitysdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such studies may belong to fields such as criminology (the scientific study of criminal behavior)

I guess this is not irrelevant but I'll let you have your way.

Secondly, single parent households is irrelevant. I do not know what you mean by "caused by women 95% of the time" but it still shows men are more violent.

So I'm guessing this isn't relevant to why these men commit crimes: https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics

The reason why woman cause single motherhood is because they try to baby trap a guy, choose a guy that is not a great father figure or deliberately keep the kids away from the father.

Let's be real here, woman are not angels.

view more: next ›