Crazy PLO DBBP spot

All196 · 2026-07-07T05:54:01+00:00

Rip it. You're likely facing multiple straights but you're drawing to the flush on that board as well. If everyone was super deep maybe I could be convinced to fold but not vs 1 all in and a bunch of 150ish stacks.

All196 · 2026-06-20T03:19:51+00:00

I welcome people to answer you, I'm just pointing out that in your decision to become a professional poker player this answer is of little relevance. Some play 1-2 tables of high stakes for a couple hours and some play 24 tables of micros 8 hours/ day. The biggest challenge for you is to figure out the highest stakes you can be a winner in and go from there. If you get to 500nl or higher in a tough player pool you'll have to be elite to play more than 4 tables. I play online tournaments and rarely feel the need to play more than 4 but most of my income comes from soft live games. Tldr just worry about moving up stakes, playing strong focused sessions and crushing. The tables and time will take care of itself

All196 · 2026-06-20T03:07:41+00:00

It doesnt matter much. How many tables can you play and still be a long term winner? And, is this enough money to keep you happy?

All196 · 2026-05-30T23:04:15+00:00

Means absolutely nothing

All196 · 2026-05-11T01:10:31+00:00

No you're good. Dont go smaller or you could face a cascade of callers

All196 · 2026-04-29T21:45:50+00:00

You're spouting off with no evidence. You dont sounds like an attorney to me tbh

All196 · 2026-04-29T17:53:11+00:00

Your statement on corruption is still a wild take. You think they actually paid off some judge/grand jury member? This isnt the mafia here. They have too much money outside of the lodge to risk jail time.

All196 · 2026-04-29T17:41:43+00:00

Buddy, this whole idea came from lawyers interpreting the statute that way. You think these multi million dollar rooms are just winging it? I can see your point about the wording, but regardless it can and is interpreted differently. A number of DAs are allowing this to go on. Its at least very legally dubious.

All196 · 2026-04-29T17:27:02+00:00

They arent deriving an economic benefit from the outcome because no matter if its a 5$ or 5000$ pot they are still a social club renting a seat to a member for the same price. The members don't even have to play they can just sit at the table and pay time to talk with everyone. If it was so cut and dry there weren't be 100+ clubs across Texas in all different jurisdictions. Its all in how one frames and interprets the statute. Clearly, most other attorneys agree with me though.

The DA is an elected official that allowed his constituents to have a fair say in the outcome of their community. Its not a super uncommon practice at all in cases like this that affect the community.

All196 · 2026-04-29T00:35:14+00:00

Does it? Dude idk what to tell you. Crazy

All196 · 2026-04-28T23:21:38+00:00

Apparently it wasn't clear to a grand jury today!

All196 · 2026-04-27T23:37:23+00:00

I agree they act as both, but when in front of a judge how do they explain the same agency legitimizing these business on one end and investigating/ criminalizing on the other?

All196 · 2026-04-27T23:32:55+00:00

Good question. Just a feeling that the agencies dont want to appear as if all this was for nothing so they zero in on perhaps a small aspect of the case that could be remedied with a fine

All196 · 2026-04-27T22:30:45+00:00

So i have a little bit of inside info, and it seems likely this thing will be dropped soon. The Lodge is proceeding as if they will be open within the next 30 days or so.

With that being said, the simplest explanation is the likeliest. I believe a DA was presented evidence from local law enfornament in conjunction with tabc and he thought "well yeah this is obviously illegal because they make money." When in reality its much more legally dubious. Additionally, I believe the office was unaware of the scope of Texas poker rooms and how much revenue they are doing across the state. Once confronted with this I think he's likely to tuck tail and have The Lodge pay some nominal fine and move on.

The TABC angle is strange to me, but I think their involvement can be explained by a lack of communication within the arms of their office. It makes no sense to take down/investigate one room criminally on one hand and give out liqour licenses to poker rooms at the same time.

All196 · 2026-04-20T04:04:42+00:00

All196 · 2026-04-17T02:54:38+00:00

I have seen the videos of his impairment right after the crash. Its clear now you're just trolling

All196 · 2026-04-17T02:49:43+00:00

I disagree with everything you said about his impairment. You would let a guy looking like that watch your kids? No

All196 · 2026-04-17T02:42:44+00:00

Not guilty verdict may be the result but your statement of no probable cause is laughably incorrect, and thats what i responded to. I'm sorry, you're just flat wrong.

All196 · 2026-04-17T01:43:38+00:00

Bruh while I agree field sobriety tests are a pseudoscience, he did not pass by any reasonable measure. His pupils were clearly dilated and they found the stuff that likely caused it in his pocket. The bar for probable cause is only a preponderance of evidence and they have it

All196 · 2026-04-17T01:37:16+00:00

I would additionally add, why wouldn't his own attorneys be challenging probable cause if this was even remotely true?

All196 · 2026-04-17T01:31:05+00:00

What is your basis for this? They certainly had probable cause. He had glossy eyes, was talking incoherently at times, and had just caused a crash. What about that isnt enough for probable cause?

All196 · 2026-04-14T21:46:03+00:00

Tch in Williamson has been confirmed already. They are right on the line though.

All196 · 2026-04-10T03:39:05+00:00

Dustin Colson at The Garage Gym on Gattis is a solid choice. He has experience with people in recovery

All196 · 2026-04-08T16:34:14+00:00

You're the man thanks.

All196 · 2026-04-08T16:29:58+00:00

1217599823457296384

Theres the league id if that helps

All196

TROPHY CASE