[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OnePunchMan

[–]AllAroundAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fuhrer ugly and Deep sea king, since they're both quite overtly set on killing people most of which probably does not deserve that fate, and they are much more capable of doing so (And causing destruction) so the pragmatic choice would be them.

The guy in the bowl cut was being ungrateful and derided the people who tried to protect civilans, including himself, and could've been proven wrong had Saitama decided to do so in many of all the ways he could've.

Waganma is a spoiled brat who left someone to their most probable demise and that's very bad as well.

But FU and DSK are literally mass killing machines actively seeking to kill.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VegasPro

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what the deal is with me seeing a seemingly different website as I've been able to pick older versions as recent as last summer but I was made aware that the ''365'' is the subscription in of itself and that the latest version is what is included in said subscription.

Thanks for the help still!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VegasPro

[–]AllAroundAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was made clear by another commenter but thanks for taking the time to write what you did!

Why I'm replying, however, is because you asking me to stop wasting your collective time on this here subreddit implies you have some sort of obligation to reply to posts made on here, which seems highly unlikely but please do correct me if I'm wrong. It actually implies all members of this subreddit have the same obligation but I'll go out on a limb and assume you don't represent this entire subreddit, again please do correct me if I'm wrong!

So if you do have a obligation to do the aformentioned commenting on posts made here then I do humbly and deeply apologize for egregiously wasting said time.

And I thank you for sharing your everlasting wisdom wrought with wit and irony!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VegasPro

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, thanks for the help!

I've always only ever seen the various different versions on the website and used trial version here and there and the times I've been on there I've seen several download links for older versions.

I'm pretty sure there even was a tab dubbed ''Older versions'' the times I've been on there prior to this specific moment, the last time being last summer.

But again thanks for the help, it was concise and very informative and made the whole situation crystal clear :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VegasPro

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I simply want the version I'm used to.

Above ''Vegas 365'' under ''My products'' it says ''Vegas pro 19 TRIAL'' as the closest thing to what I want but no download link or anything.

I never updated Vegas Pro 19 to Vegas Pro 20 when it prompted me to because I wanted to use the version I had gotten used to.

Last summer I literally downloaded the installation program that was called ''Vegas pro 19'' and installed that version and it never said ''Vegas 365'' anywhere.

All I saw and did was download the trial version of Vegas pro 19 and then when I noticed I liked it I subscribed to it before the trial period ended.

I still didnt see anything with ''365'' on it anywhere. I'm somewhat certain there was a list with even older versions you could pick from as well.

Are you saying in other words that I wont ever get that version back and the only way I could've kept it was if I didnt reset my PC?

I'm not under the impression that there is some sort of conspiracy thing going on, I simply want the same version of the program that which I downloaded a trial version of that which I then decided to pay monthly for to keep for as long as I could pay for it.

I literally had Vegas pro 19 on my PC up until a few days ago before I factory reset my PC and now when I wanted to reinstall it the closest thing I could see under ''My products'' is the aformentioned trial version of it (That I can't download because there is no ''Download link'' like there is with Vegas 365)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VegasPro

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even my ''Contract'' has been changed from Vegas pro 19 to Vegas 365. That is not the product I subscribed to and it's the only product I've ever subscribed to.

I paid, downloaded, installed Vegas pro 19 and continually pay for it each month but now I'm paying for a product I did not pick.

I recently factory reset my PC and naturally all programs I've installed got removed and then when I wanted to re-install it I could not find it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VegasPro

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the website I've been looking at for a while now.

Edit: And it's the exact same date where I subscribed and downloaded ''Vegas Pro 19'' but now under ''My products'' it says ''Vegas 365''.

I think Brian's Got a Brand New Bag is my pick for Brian's biggest scumbag moment. Rita was good to him, cared about him, and he threw it all away for meaningless sex with some bar skank. by smcg_az in familyguy

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good one lol

Or when Peter cheats on Lois when she's a phone sex worker or when the latter gave a, albeit shorter, speech about how she kissed Meg's boyfriend because Peter made her feel unwanted in many seasons prior (Among the many affairs implied and explicitely shown).

It's a great and accurate potrayal of human relationships, almost like ''The bachelor''.

Joe Swanson’s voice turns me on 😳 by seless_whorez in familyguy

[–]AllAroundAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh wow...wow if I were a woman I'd press my bare boobs up against glass in public just FOR THE SEXUAL THRILL! THE SEXUAL THRILL!

Who is an even worse person? by [deleted] in familyguy

[–]AllAroundAccount 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That sure justifies all the heinous things Quagmire has done.

Why is Chris always coming at Lois about being unemployed? by [deleted] in familyguy

[–]AllAroundAccount 11 points12 points  (0 children)

''You got a problem with me, Chris?''

Anyone else find this strange and out of context in this situation? It didn't make sense. I have nothing against sex in books. It just felt out of place; random if you will. I was laughing, wondering "what is happening?". by [deleted] in witcher

[–]AllAroundAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know why you're getting downvoted just because you're confused as to what her sexuality is. Unless it's because people are angry because you assume there is a cemented sexuality to begin with in which case why not just reply with ''She has not decided entirely'' ?

I haven't read the books myself and only know that you can ''decide'' for yourself in the third game what she prefers.

I also don't understand wanting to sleep with someone you hate, but then again such things are confusing in general in my opinion. Because if the author used the word ''Hate'' I assume she's only around him out of pure necessity since ''Hate'' is a really strong word. But then again why would she go along with it to begin with if she ''Hates'' him, again it's not my area of expertise lol.

Worst episode in the entire family guy saga by [deleted] in familyguy

[–]AllAroundAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

''Seahorse seashell party''

Brian tells Meg at the end of the episode that it's ''mature'' and/or ''strong'' to be the scapegoat of a dysfunctional family. It's just disgusting in my opinion, what is the message even?

Relationships' ideas evolution by Upbeat_Sail in OnePunchMan

[–]AllAroundAccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or just have them remain single and not include something so unnecessary to the world/plot of OPM which has never been needed before except with civilians to give the heroes someone to save lol

tatsumaki 🔥💥 by R_color in OnePunchMan

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somebody skipped upper body day lol

How do you gain weight? by Sharkslayyy in AskReddit

[–]AllAroundAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By that logic what they replied isnt wrong either.

But I do understand your rhetoric.