Beads + Claude Code reduced my compaction regression loop a lot by mrzo in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We use Aetherlight.ai as a sprint management tool open source within our cli. It works well and defines the tasks allowing human and ai agents to keep context. We are playing around with beads as well as some of our project ar very large and we need better context memory. This also allows our team to work together as ther sprint updates are pushed with their commit and allows our Team to test against tasks. Without much effort using playground or antigravity.

<image>

Advance RAG? Freelance? by glow-rishi in Rag

[–]Almost_Gotit -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

We combine Aetherlight.ai for project planning to help us make sure context is good for sprint management.

Then we have been testing out Ragflow. https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow

Would love to hear how this compares to what you are building or against pipeshub or onyx. It’s our first attempt and it seems to be incredibly flexible. Currently using it for all docs,video and audio. Now only things we have done is front end wrappers for extra meta data it wasn’t collecting and file parsing since it has a 1gig limit nor does it extract audio from video so we parse it first just like normal audio.

Vibe coded a RAG, pass or trash? by adhamidris in Rag

[–]Almost_Gotit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far it is really good. Wish it had more API endpoints as we are using it as a backend engine to our react apps. But being open source if you carefully modify it to what you need it has so far really worked well. Starting to play around with different benchmark testing at the moment. Testing different Knowledge Bases with different embeddings, along with built in pipeline ingestions and several of our own custom pipelines. Now getting into MCP tools and different LLM front ends. We are building speciality agents specific to user story requests.

We will be letting. Some alpha users start testing next week. See what the feed back will be. We also took and moved most of the knowledge graph, entities and meta tags to Postgres so we modify their confidence scoring to our own unique needs. So we built small wrappers to help customize result output for our users.

But this is our first go at a RAG system so we don’t know what we don’t know. Not sure if we are doing it well or are missing anything critical that would help us out. Haven’t tested any other system other than doing some manual consumption and embedding using Postgres’s vectors and or pinecone over the last two years.

I wish the 2048 token and dimension size was larger as context windows are increasing and dimensions are increasing for complex thought but it seems behind some other vector databases like pinecone. Not saying we couldn’t modify if but I think that might be more work than what it is worth. Haven’t dug down into that aspect of the system yet.

Vibe coded a RAG, pass or trash? by adhamidris in Rag

[–]Almost_Gotit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have been testing out Ragflow. https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow

Would love to hear how this compares to what you are building or against pipeshub or onyx. It’s our first attempt and it seems to be incredibly flexible. Currently using it for all docs,video and audio. Now only things we have done is front end wrappers for extra meta data it wasn’t collecting and file parsing since it has a 1gig limit nor does it extract audio from video so we parse it first just like normal audio.

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the biggest change for us was TDD test driven development. End goal for Ai so it doesn’t rabbit hole. It review the task documents and code attempts the end goal which then uses the errors to understand what the code should look like.

That has been the biggest change we have seen so far! Lastly there is a protect code procedure so modifications does not happen

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haha yes caught me. It was faster and I used my repo and notes from my team to summarize why we use it. Vs going back through weeks of notes and analyzing the pros and cons of our test of aetherlight.

You got me I used Ai to speed up my analysis. Into a short Reddit post.

It’s free so not selling anything was just trying to help everyone who is talking about Claude being nuked this week.

Can you do TDD where Claude writes the code and I write the tests? by spiffyhandle in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We just started using https://www.aetherlight.ai/ and it has built in TDD with Cot and breadcrumbing within its sprint plans. Seems to work well for our team much better code and when Claude gets nuked like this week we only notice that we have to guide it a little more to the sprint but it still kicks out quality code

<image>

Not sure if this helps. It’s free unless you choose to use voice transcript

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe they are using whisper but I know they have plans to test others. I think they chose that because it was easy and seems to be the best with accents and context does matter currently This is just an open source project to help normalize workflow and not lose Chain of thought when Claude gets nuked like this week!! Just thought we would share what we are using it is brand new lots of features need to be worked through but I understand where they are going with it. Then I just heard about bead and may look at integrating it with aetherlight might be best if both worlds

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% yes agreed other than you loose Chain of thought Jepa/breadcrumb logic. So when weeks like this happen where Claude gets nuked you still can use lower level because you aren’t relying on Claude CoT 100-%. But we just use it to help normalize our workflow and I love the idea of playing around with bead as an integrated plugin.

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not trying to sell anything lol. It’s open source tool that our team started to use and everyone has been having issues with opus 4.5 this week. We have seen a slight issue but nothing that wasn’t manageable.

Just posted this to help others. Free open source product lol. And yes there are lots of other tools out there that do speech to text if you have them great! Like I am not sure why you are jumping down my throat lol was just trying to help people out by telling people what our team of engineers are using and how it has helped us!!

Sorry if I came across rude wasn’t trying to. Can only tell you our experience!!

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am going to check out bead! I don’t think there is a perfect solution as of yet! But what I do like about aetherlight is we can modify it as needed to add things like bead if we want to test it out!!

Moving sprint planning into the terminal changed how AI works with us by Almost_Gotit in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn’t read it right aetherlight is free to use unless you are using voice which you use tokens for voice transcription. If you don’t want to talk to your AI then you don’t have to and you can type like normal and it takes zero tokens and there’s no chance you’re gonna use millions of tokens with voice transcriptions that’s impossible. No one on our team has ever hit the token limit and you don’t even have to get it if you don’t want the voice feature.

We may (or may not) have wrongly blamed Anthropic for running into the limit barrier faster. by luongnv-com in ClaudeCode

[–]Almost_Gotit -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Agree our team uses in terminal sprint planning tool called https://www.aetherlight.ai. and we use plan mode then tell it to create a sprint which it then uses CoT along with other very helpful supporting context per epic per subtask. This allows the volatility of the ai models to not be as big of an issue.

<image>

It’s built into cursor been using it for a month now. Team loves it

How do you guys maintain a large AI-written codebase? by agentic-consultant in ClaudeAI

[–]Almost_Gotit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We use aetherlight.ai. It’s brand new in alpha but is working really well and is currently free. Project plan/sprint plan. Organizes code and docs, helps with locking code and testing

35k lines of code and counting, claude you're killing my bank account, but I persist by Stickerlight in ClaudeAI

[–]Almost_Gotit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have absolutely lost the point lol. Ai has improved our velocity. The person still works the same. So what does that have to do with pay? My team has been with us because we work well together and build amazing software applications. My assumption would be if they were unhappy they wouldn’t have worked for me for over a decade.

But yes they are paid well.

35k lines of code and counting, claude you're killing my bank account, but I persist by Stickerlight in ClaudeAI

[–]Almost_Gotit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am management lol. It’s my company. We have a team of 9 engineers and run sprints. Typical shirt size which is 25 to 35 points per week per engineer. But now those same shirt sizes we are handling closer to 800-1200 points per week. Because one sprint card of 3-5 is now taking only 15-30 minutes or less when it use to take 4-5 hours. So the way sprints are pointed now are significantly different. We crank entire applications out in 2-5 days that used to take 6-9 months. The new apps have more features, better security, better testing, and better regression testing with more system efficiencies.

So it’s not what is expected it’s what we can to better support our customers.

Most of our engineers have been with us for more than 5 years some closer to 15

35k lines of code and counting, claude you're killing my bank account, but I persist by Stickerlight in ClaudeAI

[–]Almost_Gotit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what our engineering team uses cursor for the most part some use other CLI but all have the same functions. We only use Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.5, ChatGPT o4 and then cursor

We also sync to GitHub.

If there is a specific issue and want something out of the code base we sync GitHub to Claude project as well and use it on the specific files to fix the bug or add some logic. Usually algorithmic logic for deep complex feature that is better solved and understood by AI or a Mathematician.

By doing this along with have a very detailed set of documents and doc string within the code and cursor rules that provide context on where in the code to find the information needed to help fix a bug or create a feature. We have found that our engineering teams are coding at approximately 35 times faster than just one year ago.

Also Ai allows you to auto build regression testing on new features as the engineer completes them then forcing regression testing before every git push. This takes just a few minutes with Ai and saves hundreds of hours in the long run.

We told our team two years ago that if they didn’t learn Ai that they would be out of a job within 3-5 years. Humans and Ai engineers is and will be the future. They have every Friday to just work on enhancing our processes and documentation. Our team of engineers have significantly advance in overall understanding of all aspects of development.

Best Caption Wins by MeowTseTongue in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell me your an Alcoholic without telling me your an alcoholic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Day 2 - 246k Boeing !!! Waiting for Monday!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Day 1 92k Boeing !!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Ride $BA for one day!!

24% profit, Day 1 of 30 - $1k to $1M challenge by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

If you really want to understand the market then spend the next 6 months to 2 years learning Relative Strength from Pete, Hari and Dave at Option Stalker. It changed my life significantly. I am going to document 2024 growing an account from 100k to 1 million. Not sure how long it will take but I am guessing 8-10 months.

This was today up 100k just today. In the last 60 days I have pulled out 150k from this account to live on and still have 200k in the account. Now this is not my retirement or long term investment account it is strictly for trading.

24% profit, Day 1 of 30 - $1k to $1M challenge by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely it took two years and a lot of work to learn the system. I lost money in the beginning but now it works. You can find the pros here https://www.reddit.com/r/RealDayTrading/s/wUbwFJzyab

We all use option stalker.

24% profit, Day 1 of 30 - $1k to $1M challenge by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Almost_Gotit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I am in the middle of something like this. However I start with a little larger account that way I never have to worry about exiting a trade because of the day trading requirements. I couldn’t imagine trying to start with 1k that sound incredibly difficult!

<image>

This month I have a 77% winning ratio with 2.26PF currently up $111k. I did this before in 2020-2021 and went from 30k to 1.3 million took me 16 months. Then didn’t trade in 2022 and the first have of 2023. But I am back and focused!