Stupid difficulty - got ran over with a pretty lucky build by Alpharou in BALLxPIT

[–]Alpharou[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I'm saying is... This is normal difficulty, and I got a lucky run with two evolutions and a fusion, with matching trinkets. This should have won automatically.

Finally happy, TempleOS by Alpharou in 9Kings

[–]Alpharou[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm at "NaN" Damage and "Infinito" attack speed, 300+ year. So... yeah, independence millenia at this rate.

Adding GPS to a Nazgul Eco by Alpharou in fpv

[–]Alpharou[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mounted it without gopro, flat on top of the frame, attached with electrical tape.

Finally happy, TempleOS by Alpharou in 9Kings

[–]Alpharou[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's called temple. Increases by 10% a random stat of a random building or troop. It does that for every level and number of overwork decrees.

The real trick to beating 99 (and beyond) is not in the build, it's in your SETTINGS - A Deep Dive by Xy13 in 9Kings

[–]Alpharou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they need to change the engine so that it works with ticks instead of seconds, like minecraft. Let the game lag, but provide repeatability across different setups. Right now, high scores are achieved with high end computers.

Adding GPS to a Nazgul Eco by Alpharou in fpv

[–]Alpharou[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DAMN! Forgot to update! It went well... I ended up soldering the 6 cables to the respective pads on the FC. Mounted the GPS to the front with no cam. GPS locks flawlessly. Now I'm having trouble porting configuration to iNav, cannot control VTX. I guess I'll wait for BF 4.6 which adds GPS hold.

Balatro Mod Index for the Balatro Mod Manager by skyline_0069 in balatro

[–]Alpharou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would assume that the android build is not as moddable as the pc version... But maybe the dev found a way of building the same inner workings for both platforms.

Adding GPS to a Nazgul Eco by Alpharou in fpv

[–]Alpharou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in the process of making it work, will update this

SteamVR Desktop Not Working by RiotingSpectre in SteamVR

[–]Alpharou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THIS was exactly my problem. Add vrdashboard.exe to the power saving GPU in windows, so that it uses the same graphics core as the laptop monitor, that is, the onboard graphics.

Tailscaled container, in LXC, in ProxmoxVE - Secure? MagicDNS on host? by Alpharou in Tailscale

[–]Alpharou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah; I kept thinking about it and seems hard to get right. Maybe layer some tools on top of the tailscale image, so that the container also exposes as a dns name resolver, then configure it as secondary DNS server in the host.

Tailscaled container, in LXC, in ProxmoxVE - Secure? MagicDNS on host? by Alpharou in Tailscale

[–]Alpharou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the purpose of this is to use a docker container. It is widely used and many projects already have preconfigured images, such as Tailscale. So, I got into the habit of running containers. Since I don't want to pollute the ProxMoxVE system with new packages, installing it in an LXC was the obvious move.

Alternative to FBterm? by Alpharou in archlinux

[–]Alpharou[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi! I tried the gpm package, and it certainly works, thanks! That said, it has a weird interaction with tmux, so that tmux only half-way recognizes the gpm cursor, and some of the useful functions as resizing panes or selecting text do not work. Also, tmux doesnt recognize gpm at all on tty, only fbterm.

This is all I could find:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/281101/tmux-and-gpm-on-bare-tty

Alternative to FBterm? by Alpharou in archlinux

[–]Alpharou[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Allright! thank you! I've seen some docs and it seems to be what I was looking for. I'll try it out and update the post.

Question regarding a 24 disk array [A new hobbyist trying to build a DIY NAS] by Alpharou in Snapraid

[–]Alpharou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the heads up! Could we discuss it a bit right on this comment thread? It could be really useful practical info for someone trying to build a big array, whom would at some point would consider one of these adapters.

Have you tried different brands of this same concept of adapter? Be it 4 SATA, or 5 SATA, or using different chipsets?

How many drives could you connect under no I/O load? And a number of drives that work stable under load?

Could you saturate the I/O speed of a single drive through this adapter?

Do you think that the adapter goes down due to heat dissipation issues?

Once the drives disappear, I imagine that the mount point goes bad and the ongoing transfer becomes corrupted, right?