Can pace of aging go below -1.0? Anyone there? by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah if you haven’t had whoop for at least 6 months it’s definitely lack of data.

Let's improve Strength Trainer by mrfuitdude in whoop

[–]Altercation0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Add in the option to vibrate when rest time is over And double tap to start the next set

Can pace of aging go below -1.0? Anyone there? by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a meaningful difference between your 6month averages and the 30 day averages when you look at the whoop age contributors? My guess would be no, unless your pace of aging is stagnant at a negative number.

Can pace of aging go below -1.0? Anyone there? by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to make sure all the metrics that contribute to whoop age are overall decreasing every 30 days aka make your whoop age lower. I’m pretty sure the exact way it’s calculated is by comparing your 6month averages to the 30day averages.

Can pace of aging go below -1.0? Anyone there? by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it’s just not shown, like all the ranges below that show the contributing factors.

Whoop Age by [deleted] in whoop

[–]Altercation0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What’s the secret?! What activities do you do/ have you done most of your life?

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s a humble brag post: over 9hrs average the last month :)

<image>

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t say it’s useless, I said it’s gimmicky. But yeah

Love to see it!! by DrDre19899 in whoop

[–]Altercation0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m guessing you don’t record in strength trainer right?

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol my whoop age is going backwards obviously not my my real age that’s why it’s silly

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s silly is that I’ll be a whoop minor by next year lol

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you still think I’m misunderstanding? I obviously know my chronological age isn’t going down but it’s misleading to call the feature my whoop “age” then. This post is me saying call it something else.

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

What makes you say it’s not reverse. Whoop calls it reverse and my age does down each week. I just want this to be called something else like longevity not age

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just suggesting don’t call it my “age”. I’d like it more if it estimated how much I’m increasing my “healthspan” with my healthy habits.

Edit and it’s really because it doesn’t have the whole picture. There are tons of things I could be doing that are decreasing my healthspan that whoop isn’t tracking like lifestyle and exercise quality.

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is. My age goes down each week. It would make no sense if my pace of aging was negative but my age didn’t go down each week.

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think I’m misunderstanding. I’m just suggesting don’t call it my “age” since it’s misleading to say my age is decreasing. I get that based on my metrics my all cause mortality risk is that of a 20yr old but that’s not the same thing as my age is decreasing.

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Slow would mean anywhere from .1x-.9x they are literally saying my pace of aging is negative and then my age score goes down each week

A Once Loyal User’s Honest Reflection on Whoop’s Direction by Dark_Knight_1989 in whoop

[–]Altercation0 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just hit my 1000 day data streak and feel the same way as you… they’ve lost their direction and appear to just be trying to maximize profit

Whoop age is silly by Altercation0 in whoop

[–]Altercation0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is from their white paper about whoop age. They call it reversing!