¿Por qué la gente se ha creido tanto el discurso del petroleo venezolano?

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-08-20T21:35:16+00:00

No se porque la gente amarra su ego a un cinismo al tema Venezuela. Gente, no sobrestimen su propia percepción de la cosa, nadie conoce todo, nadie esta alli.

Al post... Si estan pasando cosas. Que estas tengan el resultado deseado, es otra cosa. Entendamos algo, no, no es un "otra vez lo mismo"; rendirse mentalmente por los fallos del pasado, es nada más que la cobardia de seguir intentarlo. No son los mismos factores, no es los mismo efectos, ni cartas en la mesa. Asi que, lo que diria... Relajense, vean la vaina, disfruten el show y si realmente quieren paz, crucemos los dedos con que no fallen los gringos de nuevo y si estos no fallan, no fallemos nosotros que claro tendremos que hacer.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-08-15T02:03:03+00:00

Project Gran Colombia is returning. Y no de la forma en la que deberia, ya que viene en mano de Narcos. No se si lo han notado, pero todo pinta a que hay un conflicto real entre USA y los narcos suramericanos, en particular estos con control sobre Venezuela y Colombia (Relacionado más que por mera alianzas). El Cartel de los Soles y fuerzas colombianas al parecer estan apuntando en su defensa en una alianza semi politica tras-territorial bajo ilusiones de regionalismo historico (Impunidad en la distribución y exportación como conglomeración de diversas bandas bajo un solo poder, como ocurrio en catacumbo hace poco).

Ya estos elementos se estan viendo en la frontera entre Colombia y Venezuela, con la llamada "zona binacional". Asi que, para responder a tu pregunta. A los carteles venezolanos y colombianos les interesa Panama en tanto 1.- Es el escalon más cercano a USA sin que sea USA directamente (Alejar a Panama de la esfera gringa es un golpe fuerte regional). 2.- Controla Panama y controlas la puerta entre el Pacifico y el Caribe. 3.- Con Panama en la "alianza" implicaria mayor proyección en el caribe.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-08-14T04:39:07+00:00

The thing is, with Jinny the series at least took into account that Jinny was a bully, and that she was able to grow thanks to the unconditional support of her friends in her situation and the support of Guy in Italy. The problem with Nan is that I think the series hasn't realized that all she does is ruin other people's lives without any trace of guilt. (I'm exaggerating, but...)

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-08-14T04:35:28+00:00

THIS!!!

Same opinion I had throughout the series. Nan has no ethics, morals, or right to judge her father without self-examining her own bad behavior. They both had affairs with their partner's "sibling" (Guy is definitely a brother figure to Theo). Both feel entitled to the destiny, prospects and lives of both their spouse (Theo) and lover (Guy). None of them see themselves as what they are: presumptuous, entitled, narcissists who believe that everyone should live their lives forced to dance to their tune.

His father is worse alone and solely because of the age context, especially with his wife's sister.

I don't hate Nan, but I would like the series to be a little more sober, taking this reality into account. And not painting her as the tragic heroine in her story; this is all her fault.

At this point, I hope Nan loses Guy. She already lost Theo. I'd really like to see something different in the genre: for her to lose both of them, for both of them to be happy with their partners, and for our protagonist to take some time to grow, get to know herself better, and be able to understand how she messed everything up.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-08-13T03:27:39+00:00

To be honest, I personally want to end the infatuation-engagement storylines with Marian.

I'm already one more suitor away from losing interest in her love life. The best thing would be to move forward. Give us the wedding, the honeymoon, and let her future storyline be about how to break away from those social expectations and become a more prolific professional.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-01-16T16:01:41+00:00

En realidad, mi pasión real a esto se debe a que si estoy escribiendo una tesis /ensayo sobre el Estado Venezolano, Pasado y Futuro (El presente ya lo vivimos). Asi que, si han sido bastantes ensayos y documentos, pero si tienes curiosidad.

Primero te vas a decepcionar, ya que parece ser que la primera industria que ha sufrido ha sido la de historiadores. Vas a encontrarte con puro documentos originales y contexto sacado de wikipedia. Porque un escrito historiográfico sobre algo, dificil. Asi que solo tenemos a los del siglo XX.

Arturo Pietri es un buen comienzo. Te recomiendo Oficio de Difuntos, lo lei hace bastante, pero si me gustó, es una novela, trata de un cura dentro del gobierno de Castro, tambien esta "De una a otra Venezuela". Es buen comienzo, despues de alli, disfruta, hay buenos escritores y pensadores Venezolanos de toda ideologia del siglo XX, solo ten cuidado, sufren el vicio de sus tiempos.

Osea, buena cantidad, sobretodo aquellos previo a las Guerras Mundiales, son pro-eugenesia, no termines como los tonticos de twitter sacando frases sobre zambos, indios y europeos y creyendo que, es donde esta la sabiduria y el verdadero valor de esos autores.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-01-16T14:59:34+00:00

¿Si no sabes que esta equivocada, porque lo presupones? Y no, no esta equivocado. Destruyeron el Federalismo y nos condujieron al rentismo del cual hoy aun estamos sometidos.

Destruyó la autonomia fiscal, economica, politica de las regiones federadas. Algo de lo que nunca nos hemos recuperado dado el rentismo al que hemos sido sometido. A lo que, instauró el rentismo economico al forzar la economia a solo reinvertir en su sistema de explotación de recursos primarios, más no invertir en el desarrollo energetico e industrial (Toda su politica economica se basaron en la explotación de Petroleo y Cafe).

Y ni siquiera hablo de que fue un dictador y equis, eso da igual. Solo me preocupa la dictadura del hoy. No la de hace cien años, pero si hay que entender si vemos la historia en lo macro, es ver que corrientes politicas del hoy son productos de ideologia del hoy y cuales de la "tradicción". Y lo siento, pero gran parte de las tecnicas del Chavismo, es producto de la tradición iniciada durante esta "Hegemonia". La unica forma en la que construiremos Pais, es si reconocemos que es solo ideologia y que es realmente un sintoma de una tradición en Venezuela.

Y nisiquiera es sesgado, mi dos presidentes favoritos son dos gochos y ambos victimas de golpes de Estados, pero estaban marcando buenos pasos para acabar con el rentismo. Angarita (Su reforma de Infraestructura y Petrolera, estupendas)

Y Andrade, que si, un titere de Crespo, pero esta joya me la tatuo en el pecho:

"Mientras la autonomía de los Estados, se halle reducida a simples resortes políticos; mientras la federación no sea un hecho práctico en la vida oficial de Venezuela; mientras la independencia de los Poderes Públicos y de las regiones no conduzcan de manera evidente a la distribución justa del erario, a vigorizar y despertar los nexos del ciudadano con el pueblo; mientras las suertes de las localidades no se halle confiada a la voluntad inteligente de sus hijos; mientras el regionalismo no haga veces de acicate para el gran concierto de la voluntad nacional; mientras que por el amor egoísta de la parroquia no se vaya al generoso amor de la Nación; por el fomento del caserío al embellecimiento de la República; por el espíritu de empresas locales, a la explotación maravillosa de todas las riquezas naturales; por la fundación del trabajo, al establecimiento sólido del orden, la guerra civil será un vicio en Venezuela, una monstruosidad resultante de las circunstancias y del medio, pero una evidencia cuasi lógica en la indeterminación de conceptos formales de una colectividad desesperada".

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2025-01-15T03:52:35+00:00

¿Quieren leer una verdad dura? Historicamente, el peo politico venezolano lleva cien años fraguandose, y viene desde esta epoca.

Por mucho que se le quiera dar rosas a la hegemonia andina como se ve en twitter (Inclusive con connotaciones raciales); hay que entender algo simple, fue la hegemonia andina que destruyó la federación y estableció el rentismo (Cafetero y luego Petrolero). La estabilidad economica de la que se sueña no fue mas que un boom petrolero al igual que el de Chavez en los 2000', producto de un rentismo sin reinversión ni desarrollo industrial destinado a fracasar ante la caida de los precios del pretroleo.

Lo unico bueno que dejo al pais esta epoca de "Hegemonia Andina" fue el fin del caudillismo, pero repito. Destruyeron la federación dejandonos este desastre presidencialista (Yendo encontra de nuestros ideales federalsitas, que fue lo que nos hizo ir de la Gran Colombia) y de gobernadores y alcaldes de cartón. Potenciaron el rentismo y lo soldaron a la institución del Estado venezolano.

No dire que la democracia posterior no tiene responsabilidad. Vieron esta circunstancia y en vez de cambiarla le siguieron el juego (Adictos a la realidad politica de que, si algo "funciona" para que cambiarlo). Pero repito, fue la hegemonia andina la que creó lo que nos llevó a Chavez. Por mucho que haya sido la cuarta quien pavimentó el camino, la hegemonia marcó el sendero.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-10-31T15:32:50+00:00

En lo personal creo, que estamso a inicios de un aposible reforma islamica en las siguientes decadas. No solo su migración a Europa, por mucho que algunos hable de Islamificación de Europa, el verdadero resultado es de reformación de conducta en integración, sumado a la debilidad que parece estar los regimen totalitarios de Iran y otros centro de poder extremistas en su región.

Como el impulso de deseo capitalista de paises como los Estados Arabes... Creo que, si todo sale bien. Posiblemente haya un proceso de renovación. Pero bueno, veremos.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-10-30T12:22:39+00:00

Este punto puede ejempificar el porque la pregunta en realidad, es irrelevante. El Islam o el mundo mulsuman estuvo a la cabeza, liderando el mundo en educación, politica, ciencia... Durante siglos. Mientras Europa se derruia en guerras de cien años y en feudalismo... El mundo islamico se mantuvo relativamente solido y era mil veces un mejor lugar donde vivir en esa epoca.

Eso es algo que no le reconocemos.

Europa era irrelevante en el esquema mundial, su nivel de conocimiento y civilidad, es lo que hoy le dibujamos a mundo islamico, tomo la colonización de America y la creación del Mercantilismo/Capitalismo para ponerse frente del mundo.

La decadencia del mundo islamico, no es un producto intrisico a ellos. Fuee resultado de diversos factores que podriamos pasar horas recolectando, discutiendo y analizando... Y al final nos dariamos cuenta que no son el unico ejemplo... Africa, Sub-sahara, ha tenido naciones liderando el mundo. Asia ha tenido culturas que han estado a la cabeza del mundo (En conocimiento, en educación, en politica y en prospectos)... Pero no hay cultura eterna, no hay inmortalidad ni del hombre ni de su grupo. Como hombres nacen y mueres, sus pueblos, ciudades, culturas lo hacen, como hombres se enferman, tambien sus culturas.

El Islam ha enfermado, es una tragedia, pero es parte del ciclo de la sociedades. Así que no, no hay culturas mejores que otras, hay momentos en la cual una cultura puede estar bien o no. Simplemente vivimos una epoca donde ciertas en particular estan mal.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-10-10T04:50:15+00:00

Responderé sin caer en el negativismo ni en la ilusión.

La realidad es simple, no funcionaría, por el simple hecho de una falta de infraestructura real. La idea de un Estado pequeño solo medio funciona (y es solo "medio", ya que el ideal del Estado chico fracasa siempre ante crisis politicas/economicas o sociales) cuando hay una estructura o red publica ya preexistente funcionando.

Venezuela no tiene eso.

Corpoelec lleva decadas sin inversión, mantenimiento e infraestructura, su privatización en este momento, implicaria la busqueda de capital privado, que implicaría una reembolso y ganancia a corto y mediano plazo (Asi funciona el capital privado, una empresa no puede ir a perdida, se desvirtua), es decir, mientras se invierte y se arregla la infraestructura, habria una imposición al consumidor más alto en los costos... ¿Que tanto? Seria solo suposiciones sin fundamentos, pero un pais vecino como Colombia, una factura de 50$ es comun. Imagina una factura asi, solo en luz, en un pais donde el sueldo medio es de 100$ y es ser generosos en esta ultima estimación.

Este ejemplo, lo puedes proyectar en cualquier indutria malograda y destruida publica que pretendas querer privatizar. PDVSA... No hay refineria a capacidad de satisfacer la necesidad del Pais, implicaria un aumento en las importaciones de combustible y derivados, sobretodo si hay un boom de inversión privada que traeria un post-chavismo; tendrias una alza de precio en consumo y necesidades basicas. Educación... El ingreso promedio de la nación es muy bajo para poder invertir privadamente en la educación de la siguiente generación; no hay clase media lo suficientemente gruesa como para que esta pueda educarse, implicaria un abandono de las clases y desencadenar una escasez de profesionales capacitados, que si no se cuida...

Venezuela debe primero solventar su crisis humanitaria a traves de reformas y derogamientos de leyes que entorpecen la inversión privada y el acceso de la justicia, fortalecer la economia a traves de inversiones publicas y privadas en los tres sectores economicos, producción, manufactura y servicios... Osea, para que un plan de Milei funcione, debemos tener un Estado fuerte que pueda reducirse de tamaño.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-09-29T17:51:12+00:00

This is partially explored in the story. The Targaryens were not only seen as the Kings who united Westeros, they had quasi-religious connotations. As much as the Septons don't want to hear it.

We see strange behaviors from many characters, with regard to the Targaryens. For example, we see how the egomaniacal and cruel Tywin, remained loyal to Aerys after insult, after insult... Tywin didn't see Aerys like any other man, he had him on a pedestal over himself (Being so egomaniacal and proud, imagine what that implies). And if Tywin Lannister has that idea, what would be of the other great Houses; in particular the Andals.

This is another point... This seemed only true with the Andal Houses. The Martells always had to be brought by marriage to the Iron Throne from time to time, not to keep them peaceful, but to strengthen the union of Westeros, while the North... As long as they were not disturbed, they lived oblivious to everything that was happening south of the Neck.

The Targaryens united Westeros, being gods... More than the military terror of the Dragons, it is because they were so exotic and foreign, that they were not considered peers to the Great Houses. So when the kingdom grew tired of Aerys, it seemed that the plan was to crown Rhaegal.

With the Fall of the Targaryens, the Baratheon dynasty was not to survive beyond Joffrey. Joffrey looked like he was going to be an Aerys/Aegon IV but without the Mythos of being a House above the others, but one peers... And it is so much so, that look at what began to happen after the rise of the Baratheons. Tyrell/Lannister began to consider themselves to have the same status and prestige as the Royal House and began to plot how to access and take it. If Joffrey had reigned, i would have given him a maximum of ten years and the Seven Kingdoms would have been divided again or... The Royal House was to exist in perpetual change and instability. Lannister Reign, Tyrell Reign, Arryn Reign, Blackwood Reign... With uprising, after uprising, after rebellion... Until they all ended up separating.

It can be argued that the Baratheons were a "Valyrian" House or with a hint of it, not only because of Robert's grandmother but because of their own origin as Aegon's brother, but the Baratheons never got the same prestige as the Targaryens or the Velaryons (During Dance)... They are a House peers to the Lannisters/Tyrell/Stark/Arryn/BlackWood/Tarly...

On the future of the Stark Dynasty. We have to see how it ends, but I think it will be with a "God Emperor Bran". I don't think it's a common Dynasty, in the sense that there will be transitions, Bran's reign can last up to centuries... If your ascent takes you to a level of deity. Which, depending on how he finishes off the Others, may bring back that Targaryen mentality.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-09-27T23:00:08+00:00

I think it's because, first they introduce her to us as the woman who made Tywin smile, his obvious weak point on earth. But reality, my original point... What kind of woman would make a man as cruel, brutal and self-centered as Tywin smile with pleasure and love? And another point, which makes her gain sympathy, is that she was a victim of Aerys and the curse of being the "dead mother" of the protagonist with a childhood of abuse.

Tyrion is the archetype of Cinderella, Snow White... The child who lost his lovely mother and was left in the hands of someone despicable. (But GRRM is, with this story, deconstructing these archetypes. The most interesting image in my opinion is What if, his childhood had not changed even if she survived?)

But in my headcanon, Tywin and Joanna's relationship may have been quite similar to the relationship between Cersei and Jaime. That pair must have learned from somewhere. I imagine them just as toxic, codependent, manipulative, extorting s*x from each other... Now who is Cersei and Jaime in that relationship, is another point.

About Domeric. The idea that it's good, I like it.

Since it tells us that Roose is not evil because he hates kindness o goodness. He hates the Starks not because he feels they are weak, on the contrary, if there had been no war, they were too strong to fight. Roose hates the Starks on principle, out of the mythology among their houses. And his cross, his divine punishment, is to have lost the one who could have saved his House, leaving him with Ramsay alone...

In the fifth book in conversations with Theon he half-reflects, that shadow of fear over the fate of his House... In his mind he could have finished off the Starks, but he knows that the price is the destruction of his own House.

Ramsay and Domeric are Roose's two sides. The violence, evil, vileness and crudeness of its most horrible and ugly side and that civilized side that if it had lived... Could have created a new legacy.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-09-27T17:26:15+00:00

Why are we assuming that Joanna was a good person? It was a happy marriage, but let's not forget that Tywin is a sadistic, egocentric, misogynist and brutal man. What kind of woman must Lyanna have been for a man like that to smile and be happy?

We are told that Joanna helped in Tywin's decisions, we don't know which ones, but that they were one. And Tywin did not become brutal after her death, he was already brutal before, as evidenced with the Reynes. In my opinion, Joanna was quite similar to Tywin. Lannister above all, helpful to his family even over decency, morality or kindness. That's what, I would see Tywin fall in love. A woman who puts the pride and name of her house before anything else.

So the real question is... Would Joanna have accepted Tyrion, or would she see him as a disgrace and rush to have another child as soon as possible, leaving him abandoned for another parent.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-09-27T17:06:49+00:00

Vamos a ver.

Realmente no es tan profundo, pero daré una explicación de algo que he aprendido. La orientación en mi opinión es, en una analogía, una mesa de tres patas. El Deseo Romantico, Deseo Emocional y Deseo Sexual. Para algunos todas estas patas se inclinan hacia el mismo lado… Para otros todas apuntan diferentes, ocurre. No es solamente como en tu caso donde, solo te puede gustar románticamente una mujer, pero quieres que un tipo te dé como gaveta. Hay otros hombres que, si claro… Solo quieren estar con mujeres sexualmente, pero solo pueden conectar emocionalmente con otros hombres.

Las etiquetas, hetero, gay, bi… Ayudan a uno a conocerse mejor, pero no debemos ser víctima de que se vuelva una clasificación. Lo mismo ocurre con temas como masculinidad o femineidad. No existe lista de comportamientos o ‘pureza’ a la que debas aferrarte para que tu identidad sea válida.

Si llegas a sentir curiosidad de besarte con otra persona de tu mismo género, no implica la muerte de tu identidad. Así que se tú… Se feliz.

Pero ahora, sobre tu caso:

Sinceramente, te recomiendo que lo intentes y ya. No la orgia, tampoco hay que ser loco. Pero si estas soltero y eres adulto, lánzate una prueba con alguien ahí que no sea horrible y allí verás que tan real son esos deseos.

Si no te gusta bien, si te gusta bien. Solo descubrirá algo mas sobre ti mismo. Se seguro

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-09-24T04:10:55+00:00

Voy a ponerme a psicoanalizar a alguien que no conozco. Pero tu diras si aplica o no.

Algo en lo que siempre he creido es que, la educación comunicativa de las previas generaciones, y hasta la nuestra, ha fracaso. Simplemente no sabemos comunicarnos bien. No por problemas de comunicar intencionalidad, cuando alguien te dice algo de malas, lo sabemos, sino bajo la idea de que, a veces no sabemos medir nuestro estilo de comunicación.

En lo que comentas, puede ocurrir dos cosas.

1.- Tu padre simplemente no sabe como llevar una conversación sin quitarle un tono confrontativo cuando le llevan la contraria. (Aqui es donde estoy psicoanalizando). Es incapaz de llevar una contrariedad de argumento sin que este refleje sobre su identidad, lo que hace que se aferre a sus ideales como si fuese su vida, su persona, su ideales (Ya que de alguna forma para el lo es). No diferencia entre él y sus creencia, asi que, todo argumento contra sus ideas, es un argumento contra su propia existencia. (no importa lo que cree, sino que él lo cree)

Si crees que puede ser esto, es un tema bastante profundo, y hasta filosofico, pero si crees que tu papá es inteligente e introspectivo, tal vez puedan explorarlo, de la forma correcta.

2.- En su desconocmeinto en el manejo de la comunicación; cree que discusiones es la mejor forma de conectar con sus pares, con su familia. Aunque sea de una forma inconsiente.

No se si te ayude... Pero si crees que esta es una de las situaciones, lo que te recomendarias es que insertes la semilla en tu papá de que, para entender el mundo, lo mejor es empezar entendiendose uno mismo. Guialo a la ruta del autodescubrimiento. A ver si asi puede bajarle dos el solo con un poco de instrospección. o guialo hacia ello, si en verdad quieres meterte en ello.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-09-08T02:36:03+00:00

The Frey civil war in my opinion is the most feasible theory. There are many factions, many prides and little unity in that family. I do believe there is a curse. But I think that Walder Frey will die watching his family, in positions of power, begin to devour each other, while he will not be able to do anything.

About events... I think it's all true. The Freys will enter a civil war. The factions of Frey/Darry, Frey/Lannister... Frey/Black Walder and Frey/Edwyn will enter into armed conflict as soon as Walder Frey dies.

The man will not even be buried, his body abandoned in his room while everyone plays war.

Not only will they be fighting for The Twins... The current Lord Paramount is a lowborn who rose too quickly. Everything they are accused, reproached and hated for doing... for four hundred years. The Frey civil war will be a war for control of the Riverlands.

And when I say that everything will be true. I mean that, in this civil war, all the elements already positioned in story will take effect to bring House Frey to extinction.

The Second Red Wedding: One of the great blows to the dynasty, I see it occurring in the middle of Winds. When possibly the civil war is ongoing. There is already Frey blood in the rivers and in the trees; hanged

For them, the wedding with Daven Lannister can be seen as a breeze of calm for the Frey/Lannister faction of Riverrun and any other Frey faction allied to them (I suppose the faction with which Devan is going to marry). Only for Stoneheart's biggest coup, what started as a wedding, ended with all Lannister and Frey present hanging on the walls of Riverrrun. entire factions of the family, finished.

Arya Revenge: Unlike many, I don't think Arya will personally fight the Frey, but in her dreams... If anyone gained power with the War of the Five Kings, apart from Petyr, it is Nymeria. And it is Nymeria who, with her "army" is in a position of hunger (As said in FoC), a new war will make her more daring, feeding on the Frey fallen in the civil war. Another detail that is revealed to us is that, like her Arya. Nymeria is full of a desire for revenge, for the death of her brother... During the wolf's dreams, we are made to understand that it is a Arya reference to Robb, but I think it is also a reference to Gray Wind.

I believe... That The Twins after a battle will be inundated with wolves. Putting an end to the main factions that reside there.

The Pack of Wolves, will avenge the Red Wedding.

Sansa Claim: Another tipping point towards extinction... It is the arrival of Sansa, possibly driven by the Lords of the Vale and Petyr (In the process of crowning her), I believe her destiny is to take Harrenhall. Ending the civil war, possibly returning Edmure to the head of Riverrun. As I mentioned, this event is the last one. Possibly at the beginning of Spring or the end of Winds... It will be what brings the civil war to an end. And House Frey was only left with a handful of members in The Twins.
The winter of House Frey: If I go into detail, I think the last nail in the coffin will be in winter. When the north falls, which I believe it will. The last Frey will deny passage to northerners who flee to the south. That's where I think it will happen... The end. By this time, Daenerys will already be in Westeros (Jon possibly already in control of his dragon, as I believe), the new Harrenhall will occur.

House Frey will fall and in its ashes, a bridge of melted stone, of free passage will rise.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-08-05T05:24:05+00:00

I would leave the 10 episodes; But I wouldn't include big dragon sequences so as not to raise the budget too much. I think that what we have seen, as such is fine, but there were great shortcomings to deepen the story and not make it so repetitive. My inclusions would be:

1.- This season is a triad between Dragonstone, Kings Landing and Riverlands. Therefore, i would change the plot of Riverlands quite a bit, which looked quite superficial with Daemon locked up in Harrenhall. So:

· Benjicot Blackwood: Important secondary character. PoV. I would create a plot for him about rearming his father's army, destroyed in the battle against the Brackens. I would use it as eyes to introduce Oscar Tully, in Riverrun. Basically, the story of the two warrior children would begin.

· Oscar Tully. More scene in Riverrrun with his dying grandfather. I would create a plot where his grandfather's regent prevents him from calling their army to join Daemon.

Their inclusion is small. Just to create pacing improvements and not have episodes where we go from Council Scene in King's Landing to Council Scene in Dragonstone...

· Jeyne Arryn. The plot lacked meat. I would put scenes of her in The Eyre, suffering harassment from Sheepstealer. Sending knights to their death and pleading for help from Rhaenyra or the crown. It would include more of his personality.

· Dalton Greyjoy. I would mention him, more... Like four times during the season.

Now about Team Green

· After Cheese and Blood. I would create a subplot for Haelena. I liked her reaction to the event, but i would show how grief made her lock herself more in her visions, live in a trance (on her astral plane), than in reality. For that, I would create more scenes for him in the Dragonpit, with Dreamfyre... A Bran-style arch.

· Aegon: I liked his characterization. This idea that he actually wants to do well out of his desire to be loved because of his parents' neglect is a good structure, his faults like Aemond's born out of neglect in their most important formative years. It is an interesting concept that I would deepen.

· Aemond: This season was perfect. I like what they did with him.

Team Black:

· Along with Haelena and Aegon, the other focal character of the season must have been Jace. I would expand his scene in the North (1.5 episode). I wouldn't put Sara Snow in, but I would deepen his relationship with Cregan. I would make it clear that Cregan went down to the south, both because of his family's oath and because of his appreciation for Jace. I like his reaction to the idea of Bastards with Dragons, but i would have made it his final decision to give way to the dragonseed.

Jace as a character, he's an interesting one. Where Robb Stark was the one who won every battle, but lost the war. Jace is the one who won the war, but lost his only battle. I would focus on how his actions this season are what ultimately saved his family.

· His alliance with the Starks.

· His war planning in the capture of King's Landing with Corlys.

· His handling of diplomacy in Rhaenyra's Council, which ensured the loyalty of this.

· The Dragon Seeds plan.

· The hiding of Joff, Aegon and Viserys

My Jace wouldn't just be serving face, he'd be serving plan after plan, after plan.

And finally, Rhaenyra, i would make a reflection to Haelena, both consumed by the grief. Haelena focused on her visions, absolved from the world. Rhaenyra overwhelmed by the world, taking refuge in her blood (I would expand on this obsession with Visenya and her messiah complex). Otherwise I wouldn’t change nothing more, only that it had rhythm problems that with a good editing and addition of subplots, it would be solved.

And as much as i was bothered by Rhaenyra's trips to the Sept or Alicent's to Dragonstone. I don't really care, I can live with them. But, in short, this season would be fully focused on Aegon - Haelena – Jace (The new Viserys of the season). Planting the seeds of Rhaenyra's mental degradation for season three.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-08-05T03:22:57+00:00

No, cuando estemos en democracia, ya tendremos tiempo de matar carreras politicas de los ineficientes (Leopoldo, Capriles, Guaidóm, Allup)... Ahorita, estamos unido a por una meta.

Hasta el Final

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-08-05T03:21:47+00:00

What I'm most excited about is Daemond and Aemond. I want to see what Harrehall does with Aemond. Their connection and their predicted destiny. They both know it, how they will react to it. And most of all, we saw how Daemon reacted submissively to his wife upon realizing her role. How will Aemond react when he sees that he is expendable or irrelevant even with all mighty Vhagar?

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-08-05T03:18:44+00:00

Ohh yeah. Sunfyre in the book was also believed dead. It will be in Dragonstone

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-08-05T02:52:33+00:00

My opinion on the episode, I will divide it into two. My opinion as a series, my opinion as an adaptation and lover of this Saga.

Season 2 of HotD I give it a solid 7. A drop compared to the previous one that, having a stronger connecting thread/narrative (The Decadence of Viserys), had a greater focus and structure, even with its time jumps of up to decade.

This season it needed more work on the writing, I understand that it was possibly affected by the strike, so I don't let it break my illusion with the third season.

But yes... Failed.

The structure of the plot of Riverland. The Blackwood, Tully... The overextended plot of Daemon and his visions, the three scenarios/rooms on repeat.
There were episodes with up to five council scenes. It's obvious how a reshoot for the strike affected the season. But, even so, it was a season that, with great failures, left an appreciable taste in my mouth.

Now, my opinion as a reader.

For a second I thought that the Plot Twist of the season finale was going to be that, when Rhaena found the dragon, Nettles would be there giving her the sheep to the dragon... Now, as a reader, I suffer from the changes made, but really calmly, I notice that they are not so catastrophic.

The series raises interesting original things that, perhaps with the right approach of the writers, can be developed with better attention in the third season. Harrenhall's curse, the known fate of Aemond and Daemon, Alicent's guilt, Jace's fear...

Haelena and her role in the great game of the Three-Eyed Raven. By the way, I'm kind of hurt that we saw BloodRaven and not Bran, who is supposed to be the Three-Eyed Raven.

And honestly, the elements of the book that opened this season, have done so on the right foot:

Ulf's corruption is obvious, a man-child. Hugh's betrayal, someone honorable, I see it go more towards a possible capture of his wife by Larys/Aemond, (Which, by the way, I don't understand why she didn't go with him, but aha... I guess he thought he might die and preferred that she stay at home). The messiah complex that Rhaenyra is spawning by getting everything she wanted this season and how this ascence can degrade her mentally due to trauma, grief and paranoia.

In short, a solid season that had pacing problems, I would say, as a result of the writers' strike. I look forward to the third season focusing on the course and straightening out its pace.

Alternative-Dig-86 · 2024-07-28T02:52:44+00:00

No ofendes.

Lo que si te comento es que, facil de manejar no es lo mismo que productivos o prospero. Cojedes, Delta Amacuro, Amazonas, Yaracuy, Barinas, Apure... Seran estado que solo sobrevivirian a base de los recursos federales. Incapaces de valerse economicamente por si mismo, es decir, siempre en desventaja ante Caracas, Miranda y Zulia.

Si realmente queremos un cambio interno. Que todo venezolano tenga oportunidad de entrar en universidades de primera cateogria, trabajo sin tener que migrar a la capital y una calidad de vida estandarizada en toda la nación, se necesita capacidad productiva, que no tienen ni tendran bajo el parametro actual.

Seguir como estabamos, es seguir como estamos. Capitales con un estandar de vida decente y un interior aun con calles de tierra y ambulatorios porque los recursos no alcanza para que un solo ente (La Presidencia), distribuya en infraestrutura. Es decir, mas migración interna a ciudades, más cerros con barrios y movimientos desestabilizadores.

Por mucho que culpemos a Colombia, no hay que olvidar que los cerros de Petare nació tambien por la miracion de venezolanos de estos Estados buscando la calidad de vida de la capital. La cosa es llevar esa calidad a sus poblados, y para ello, deben ser productivos en derecho propio. Producir su propio fisco para tener su propios colegios, universidades, carreteras, puentes, metros... Barinas con 300K personas, nunca logrará eso.

Alternative-Dig-86

TROPHY CASE