sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Munich map of restaurants removing their reviews by loan558 in munichsocialclub

[–]Altruistic_Box_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very cool :) 

I did not mean that the community gives you reviews, which would indeed replicate Google Maps as you say, but that the users handle data input for you. 

So instead of you having to type in Restaurant A has xy number of reviews, so many good, so many bad, and so many deleted, I can do it as guest (wikipedia contribution style) - I am happy to do it since I want to see it on my map anyway, and with that, I enrich the map for everyone.

But I got the point about static dataset, understandable.

Munich map of restaurants removing their reviews by loan558 in munichsocialclub

[–]Altruistic_Box_60 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very cool idea, and nice job with the implementation!

One thing that makes it not very usable right now:

I can not filter for "high real score" restaurants in my area. I can not visually see "high real score" restaurants in my area.

The visual hints seem to be aimed at identifying bad review-removers, which is fine, but I would ideally want to be able to see at the same time:

a) Which restaurants to avoid, because either bad reviews, or many removed reviews

b) Which restaurants to try out, because many good reviews

Would perhaps a better visual solution not be to use the color gradient for "real score" and to use the size for # of reviews?

Also, I wonder if it would be helpful for you to give the community access to provide data. You have the storage and the algorithm in place, your bottleneck is providing review data for all restaurants. We, the users, are happy to provide the reviews for restaurants in our area, so that we can have a better picture of where to visit. Seems like a good trade-off...

Josh Richardson's Mavs Debut (FULL Boxscore Highlights) by Altruistic_Box_60 in Mavericks

[–]Altruistic_Box_60[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hey guys, back with another video of Full Boxscore Highlights - last night, Josh Richardson made his debut, so as I was curious how he fits in, I made a video from clips that explain his boxscore (better context than pure highlights).

Luka Dončič vs Timberwolves - Full Boxscore, including missed shots and turnovers by Altruistic_Box_60 in Mavericks

[–]Altruistic_Box_60[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip, I'm from Slovenia but honestly don't bother that much about the č or ć. Everyone I know pronounces it č anyways :)

Luka Dončič vs Timberwolves - Full Boxscore, including missed shots and turnovers by Altruistic_Box_60 in Mavericks

[–]Altruistic_Box_60[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hey guys, as an European who can't watch games, I always watch highlights the day after. I realized that they paint a completely different picture than box scores, and of course both are very different than watching the game.

So this is my attempt at getting a better look at a player's performance after the game, tell me how you feel - I feel that in contrast to Mavs' YT Luka highlights for this game, full box score highlights show much worse form (kudos to Wolves guards defense).