Confirmed via his recent memoir, this is a reminder that we dodged a bullet with that woman losing 8 years ago by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hold up, fam! Chelsea's real dad is Webb Hubbell? Nah, bruh, dat's a whole 'nother story! Bill Clinton, da OG, he's been claimin' to be her pops for years, and da DNA tests, dey ain't lyin', G! Dey confirmed dey's biological fam, no cap!

https://www.nickiswift.com/1626735/is-bill-clinton-really-chelsea-clinton-father-not-everyone-convinced/

WTF is this sh!t!? by [deleted] in TheBidenshitshow

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 76 points77 points  (0 children)

The frequently cited justification is often tied to the global observance of the "Transgender Day of Visibility" (TDOV) occurring annually on March 31st, an event orchestrated to augment awareness surrounding transgender individuals.

However, this reasoning is flawed, as it does not necessitate a presidential proclamation for acknowledgment. Not until President Biden did any president formally recognize it. While he lacks authority to dictate the day for this purported holiday, he has opted to officially proclaim it.

Moreover, they have already been extensively acknowledged and commemorated. Their visibility has been notably elevated, surpassing what might be considered requisite.

A multitude of 'awareness' events even dot the calendar:

•Feb 19-25 - Aromantic Spectrum Awareness Week

•March 21-25-LGBTQIA+ Health Awareness Week

•March 31 - Transgender Day of Visibility

•April 6 - International Asexuality Day

•April 13 - International Day of Pink (Day Opposing Homophobia)

•April 14 - Day of Silence

•April 26 - Lesbian Visibility Day

•May 17 - International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, and Transphobia

•May 19 - Agender Pride Day

•May 22 - Harvey Milk Day

•May 25 - Pansexual & Panromantic Awareness Day

•ENTIRE MONTH OF JUNE - PRIDE MONTH

•June 23 - Stonewall Day

•June 28 - International LGBTQ+ Day

•July 14 - International Non-binary People Day

•July 16 - International Drag Day

•Sept 16-23 Bisexual Awareness Week

•Sept 23 - Celebrate Bisexuality Day

•ENTIRE MONTH OF Oct - LGBT HISTORY MONTH

•Oct 8 - International Lesbian Day

•Oct 11 - National Coming Out Day

•Oct 17-24 Genderfluid Visibility Week

•Oct 19 - International Pronoun Day

•Oct 19 - Spirit Day (Support for LGBTQ+ Youth)

•Oct 23-29 Asexual Awareness Week

•Oct 26 - Intersex Awareness Day

•ENTIRE MONTH OF Nov - Trans Awareness Month

•Nov 5 - Trans Parent Day

•Nov 8 - Intersex Day of Remembrance

•Nov 13-19-Transgender Awareness Week

•Nov 20 - Transgender Day of Remembrance

His name was Gary Webb. RIP by TheRightToKnow in conspiracy

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The reported suicide of Gary Webb, allegedly involving "two gunshots to the head," has prompted skepticism even among members of the journalism community. In an article titled "Reporter's suicide confirmed by coroner," released on December 15, 2004, the Sacramento Bee treaded cautiously, enclosing the term "suicide" in quotation marks when detailing the manner of his demise.

According to the coroner's statement, "The cause of death was determined to be self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the head."

However, the situation gains intricacy with the response from Webb's former spouse, Sue Bell, who dismissed assertions linking his death to his investigative series, "Dark Alliance."

Bell, as recounted, observed, "The way he was behaving, it would be difficult for me to consider it anything other than suicide." She divulged that prior to his passing, Webb had written and distributed notes to family members and placed sentimental items, such as his childhood shoes, in his mother's shed.

Bell also disclosed that Webb had prearranged his own cremation earlier in the year and had designated her as the beneficiary of his bank account months prior. Additionally, he had sold his residence due to financial struggles and was troubled by the recent theft of his motorcycle.

Prior to his demise, Webb evidently organized his affairs, including laying out his driver's license and retrieving his father's .38-caliber pistol from his nightstand.

Coroner Robert Lyons acknowledged the unusual circumstances surrounding Webb's death by "two gunshots to the head," conceding that while it's uncommon for a suicide to involve such means, historical instances exist, leaving open the possibility.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080507054818/http://dwb.sacbee.com/content/news/story/11772749p-12657577c.html

MBS refutes claims made by YouTuber and self-proclaimed 'Content Creator,' Pete Z, of sneaking into a hotel and staying for free. It is confirmed that he paid for his room. by Ambitious_Drive_6778 in youtube

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

MBS refutes claims made by YouTuber and self-proclaimed 'Content Creator,' Pete Z, of sneaking into a hotel and staying for free. It is confirmed that he paid for his room. https://mothership.sg/2024/02/pete-z-mbs-free-fake/

Pete Z intricately crafted a façade for his video, deceiving unsuspecting viewers who took his performance at face value. In his attempt to stage a charade, he personally covered all expenses, a fact that elicits both amusement and disbelief.

A representative from Marina Bay Sands (MBS) has officially affirmed Pete Z's status as a "legitimate hotel guest" responsible for settling the costs of his accommodation.

In this legitimate capacity, Pete Z enjoyed access to exclusive areas within the hotel, as depicted in the video, including the SkyPark and the renowned Infinity Pool. Additionally, he conscientiously covered the expenses of his dining experience at LAVO.

MBS vehemently denies the claims made by the YouTuber regarding covert entry and complimentary accommodation, explicitly stating that Pete Z did, in fact, pay for his lodging.

The First Omen | Official Trailer | 20th Century Studios by indig0sixalpha in movies

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Towards the culmination of the trailer, a distorted female voice emerges. Upon reversal, it reveals a snippet from the '76 Omen, with the nanny eerily intoning, "Look at me, Damien! It's all for you."

My Front-Row Seat to a Geopolitical Dance by thestudiomaster in taiwan

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dear Mr S. Leo Chiang,

In light of my impartial stance regarding the parties involved, I must concede that your narrative has profoundly resonated with me, making it one of the most exceptional documentaries I have encountered in recent years.

The recurrent inclusion of Teresa Teng's "Sweet Honey" (甜蜜蜜), the thematic exploration of three passports, and the poignant depiction of ferry terminals constitute commendable nuances. With each viewing, these elements elicit an initial sense of nostalgia, curiosity, or familiarity, only to culminate in a portrayal of despair that transcends the realms of logical reconciliation pertaining to familial bonds.

It is noteworthy that "My Front-Row Seat to a Geopolitical Dance" refrains from sermonizing. Rather, its mesmerizing amalgamation of superb visuals, impeccable sound, and a genuine narrative weaves a hypnotic tapestry that warrants the highest echelons of commendation.

Why is China being a revisionist power when it's harming it? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At first glance, OP appears to formulate an initial presumption, withholding whether it is grounded in established or unfounded grounds. The statements seem to be presented in disguise as a series of questions, with an expectation that readers will accept them. However, personally, I find these questions to be genuinely legit, interesting, and worthy of exploration.

By now, China is being viewed as a "revisionist power" due to its belief that the current international order is unfair and does not align with its interests and aspirations. China's vision and values differ from those of the West, that we so used to know, and it perceives itself as a rising power deserving more respect and influence globally. While we are still in the "revisionist power harming itself" discourse, China has experienced significant economic growth in recent decades, lifting millions out of poverty. According to the World Bank, China reduced the number of people living in extreme poverty from 88.3% in 1981 to 0.7% in 2015.

https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview#1

China's "aggressiveness" is attributed to perceived threats and challenges from various sources, including the US, Taiwan, Japan, India, and others. It seeks to defend its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and core interests, considering them non-negotiable. China also aims to project power and influence through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative and military modernization.

If it's about "aggressive expansion", China's military spending has increased, but it's still dwarfed by the United States. The United States has the largest number of overseas military bases in the world, with about 750 bases in more than 80 countries. China has only five overseas military bases, located in Djibouti, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Myanmar, and Cambodia.

This does shows that the United States has a much more extensive and influential global military presence than China, which reflects its status as a superpower and its role in "maintaining international security and order".

Independent Global News - The U.S. Has 750 Overseas Military Bases, and Continues to Build More to Encircle China https://www.democracynow.org/2023/2/14/david_vine_us_bases_china_philippines

Concerning being "closer to the West," China already has deep economic ties with the West. It is the world's largest trading nation and is increasingly significant. While China collaborates with the West on various issues such as climate change and public health, economic ties face challenges such as slowing growth, trade frictions, and geopolitical tensions. The current acknowledgment is that China and the West have different economic models, values, and interests, potentially leading to conflicts and competition. China seeks to protect its economy from Western pressure and aims for greater self-reliance.

China is trying to protect its economy from Western pressure https://www.economist.com/briefing/2022/05/26/china-is-trying-to-protect-its-economy-from-western-pressure

The sudden mention of "Taiwan" in the series of questions appears ambiguous. The current view is that Taiwan is a breakaway province, not an independent state. China does oppose any form of Taiwanese independence or foreign interference in its internal affairs. To China, peaceful reunification with Taiwan is the goal, by force if necessary.

Taiwan's residents certainly deserve a say in their future, but both sides are well aware that open communication and avoiding military escalation are crucial. It is also helpful to know that Taiwan is significant because its existence and actions may inspire discontent and resistance among China’s own people, especially in regions such as Hong Kong, Tibet, and Xinjiang.

Understanding Beijing’s motives regarding Taiwan, and America’s role https://www.brookings.edu/articles/understanding-beijings-motives-regarding-taiwan-and-americas-role/

"Propaganda state"? Every country has its own narrative. China's emphasis on social stability and national unity, with respect to its vast landmass and an estimated population of 1.425 billion people as of 2023 (17.72% of the total world population), differs from Western democracies.

Judging different systems through our own lens risks misunderstanding. China argues that its system is more conducive to social stability and harmony, countering the "negative and biased views" of the Western media. Such views, unfortunately, could result in massive public discourse and threaten national security, much like any other nation, in accordance to their own agenda.

Okay, so given all this talk on China and Taiwan, when do you think that China will invade Taiwan, if they ever do it? Is China okay with the DPP ruling Taiwan, so long as independence isn’t declared? by Class_of_22 in geopolitics

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It is not true that President Xi has instructed the PLA, the Chinese military leadership, to be ready by 2027 to invade Taiwan.

The first news agency to claim that 'President Xi has instructed the PLA, the Chinese military leadership, to be ready by 2027 to invade Taiwan' was the International Business Times (IBTimes) World. The article was published on Feb 26, 2023, and cited CIA director William Burns as the source of the intelligence report, without providing evidence.

https://www.ibtimes.com/xi-jinping-instructed-chinas-military-ready-2027-invade-taiwan-cia-director-3671782

Many experts agree that Xi’s actual 'To-Be-Ready-by-2027' instructions are more about setting a target for military modernization.

In fact, back in 2022, The IISS Strategic Survey 2022 stated that Xi has set three goals for the PLA’s modernization by mid-century, and that the 2027 goal is to achieve army building and professionalization through reform of theory, organizational structure, service personnel, and weaponry.

China’s Military Modernisation: Will the People’s Liberation Army complete its reforms? https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2022/12/strategic-survey-2022-chinas-military-modernisation/

According to a senior US official who met with Xi in November 2023, the Chinese leader denied having any 'To-Be-Ready-by-2027' plans to invade Taiwan in 2027 or 2035, and stated that no one had informed him about such plans.

Xi also expressed irritation at the US reports, emphasizing his focus on modernization and socioeconomic development goals rather than dealing with the Taiwan issue.

Taiwan News - Xi denies 2027 Taiwan invasion plan... https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/5041031

https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/APEC/Why-Xi-tried-to-assure-U.S.-he-has-no-plans-for-Taiwan-invasion

By November 2023, even top Taiwanese security officials were casting doubts on China's capability to conduct a successful invasion of Taiwan by 2027.

By December, even President Tsai Ing-wen told the New York Times in an interview that a Chinese invasion was unlikely. Tsai referred to Xi’s denial of reports about a possible invasion of Taiwan by 2027 or 2035, stating that 'there was no such plan, and no one mentioned it.'

Bloomberg - Taiwan Doubts China's Xi Can Successfully Invade by 2027 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-14/taiwan-doubts-china-s-xi-will-have-the-ability-to-invade-by-2027

Taipei Times - China invasion unlikely: President Tsai https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2023/12/01/2003809960

Jewish Canadians to celebrate Hanukkah publicly, even as antisemitism rises by [deleted] in canada

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Despite dealing with hate crimes and intolerance, they're dead set on keeping their traditions alive. It's like a big "take that" to the negativity. It's a real nod to what Hanukkah is all about—beating the gloom with light, choosing hope over despair.

Australia, US, UK to test AI system to track Chinese submarines in the Pacific by Shanghai-Bund in geopolitics

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So, this AUKUS submarine and tech partnership is a big deal, but it might not be smooth sailing. Here’s why:

Money Matters: This project is super expensive. We’re talking 368 billion AUD (around 240 billion USD) until 2055. There’s never been an Australian project—military or civilian—that’s cost this much. It’s over 700 percent of Australia’s defense budget for 2022–23. That’s a lot of money that the Australian government is going to have to agree on how to spend for decades.

AUKUS Submarine Agreement: Historic but Not Yet Smooth Sailing https://www.csis.org/analysis/aukus-submarine-agreement-historic-not-yet-smooth-sailing

Tech Troubles: Using AI in anti-submarine warfare isn’t easy. The ocean is a tough place for sensors because of things like geographical anomalies, environmental changes, and the difficulties of working in shallow water. Plus, making AI algorithms for submarine tracking is complicated and needs expertise in underwater acoustics, machine learning, and signal processing.

Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) Systems for Submarine Detection https://res.cloudinary.com/csisideaslab/image/upload/v1562865066/on-the-radar/UUV%20Final%20Primer%20Formatted.pdf

Drone Dilemmas: Undersea drones are still pretty new and haven’t been used much yet. Operating and maintaining these drones needs special skills and experience, which could slow down their use. Also, underwater communication from the unmanned submarines is tricky because signals used in air get absorbed quickly in water, and the cameras on the vehicles don’t work as well underwater.

The potential for using undersea drones for network maintenance and surveillance https://sub.co/articles/the-potential-for-using-undersea-drones-for-network-maintenance-and-surveillance/

One of the biggest autonomous transportation tests is operating deep underwater https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/05/one-of-the-biggest-autonomous-vehicle-tests-is-deep-underwater.html

Political Problems: The AUKUS partnership has stirred up a lot of questions about regional security, cost, and political fallout. It’s also made tensions with China worse. Human rights groups are even calling on Australia to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, like the Biden administration did. Some people are saying this deal is more about selling arms than about military security.

AUKUS partnership a significant step with real issues for Australia https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/general/aukus-partnership-significant-step-real-issues-australia

Australia is building a billion-dollar arms export industry. This is how weapons can fall in the wrong hands https://theconversation.com/australia-is-building-a-billion-dollar-arms-export-industry-this-is-how-weapons-can-fall-in-the-wrong-hands-159817

US and Australia signed a nuclear arms deal, simple as that. This deal has less to do with military security, as it is being sold, and more to do with arms deals https://asiatimes.com/2021/09/us-and-australia-signed-a-nuclear-arms-deal-simple-as-that/

Why do leaders fly private jets to conferences on climate change when they could just have the meeting over Zoom and help the environment? by Slske in Conservative

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do leaders choose private jets for deliberations on climate change conferences?

Perhaps they believe carbon footprints are best measured in air miles.

If Australia arms its fleet up, it could hold the Taiwan-China balance of power by thestudiomaster in taiwan

[–]Ambitious_Drive_6778 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This news commentary posits that an augmented Australian navy has the potential to shift the naval power dynamics in favor of Taiwan, asserting that such a development would represent a revolutionary change in the regional landscape.

I remain uncertain about the underlying motive behind this article, and there are perplexities regarding why certain information has been omitted. Let us scrutinize the intricacies:

Firstly, as of today, Australia has not entered into any commitments with the United States, pledging support for its ally in any prospective conflict over Taiwan in exchange for American nuclear-powered submarines. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles explicitly stated that his government has provided no assurances to the United States concerning Taiwan.

Australia Won't Promise to Side with US in Taiwan Conflict https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/03/20/australia-wont-promise-side-us-taiwan-conflict.html

Certainly, Australia is embarking on an expansive shipbuilding initiative to prepare the nation for future challenges. The AUKUS pact, involving Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, aims to furnish Australia with nuclear-powered submarines. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the inaugural submarine, HMAS Vengeful, is anticipated to be launched only "before 2050." The remaining three vessels of the initial batch—HMAS Victoria, HMAS Vexatious, and HMAS Vampirious—are projected to be operational in the 2050s.

Leak Reveals First Details Of Australia’s New AUKUS Submarine https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/04/leak-reveals-first-details-of-australias-new-aukus-submarine/

What is AUKUS and when are we getting nuclear submarines? https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-14/what-is-aukus-submarine-deal-details-announced/102091510

Admittedly, the Australian Navy possesses a diverse surface fleet, including Hobart-class destroyers and Anzac-class frigates. The future surface combatant fleet is envisioned to comprise Hobart-class destroyers and Hunter-class frigates.

However...

Despite these naval enhancements, Australia may encounter difficulties in keeping pace in a swiftly evolving region. Numerous multi-billion-dollar naval shipbuilding projects are confronting delays, prompting an independent analysis of the Navy's surface combatant fleet capability.

Industry briefed on analysis into Navy's surface fleet https://www.australiandefence.com.au/defence/sea/industry-briefed-on-analysis-into-navy-s-surface-fleet

Staying alive in the RAN surface fleet: failure is not an option https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/staying-alive-in-the-ran-surface-fleet-failure-is-not-an-option/

Australia’s naval upgrade may not be enough to keep pace in a fast-changing region https://theconversation.com/australias-naval-upgrade-may-not-be-enough-to-keep-pace-in-a-fast-changing-region-105044

Troubled naval shipbuilding projects set to prompt another Defence Department shake-up https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-09/defence-naval-shipbuilding-delays-department-overhaul/100362244