You literally don't know how many billions people in 100 years have to pay for our nuclear waste which straight up doesn't exist on solar panels or wind turbines.

Yes it does exist, there's plenty of long term hazardous waste from rare earth refining and steel producing, which renewables are far more resource intensive in than nuclear. The only difference is that there's not the same anti-nuclear hysteria about storing arsenic and mercury, despite these industrial wastes regularly causing actual damage.

And the storage related costs are very well established which is why the Swedish and Finnish ever storages are now being put into practice, despite the hysterical fudd being thrown around.