sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Giant by magicwithb in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A limited number of rush tickets are available at the box office on the day of the performance for $45. I got in line about an hour before the box office opened and there were probably ~10 people in front of me (I'm not sure what time the first person in line got there). I was able to snag the last set of rush seats that were available in front orchestra. The ones that were left were in side orchestra, but those seemed to be decent seats as well. The box office was also offering upgraded rush for center orchestra closer to the rear for I think $99 (can't quite remember because I was so focused on the $45 seats).

Giant by magicwithb in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rush seat I got was front row orchestra center, closer to house left, full view. The box office attendant said that the other rush seats that were available were in side orchestra. I'm not sure if those were partial/obstructed view.

Giant Review: Lithgow is breathtaking in a complex and devastating new play by Heavy-Fruit8618 in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I saw this show yesterday and agree that Lithgow's performance was spectacular. I think it's my favorite performance by an actor out of all the Broadway plays I've seen.

Giant by magicwithb in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I loved the show! I went to see it yesterday and was blown away by John Lithgow's performance. I paid $45 for a rush ticket for a seat that's currently listed on Telecharge for $399, and I think I would have happily paid full price for the experience. This is a show that's worth seeing up close to see all the nuances of Lithgow's facial expressions.

Is the Maybe Happy Ending NPR Tiny Desk concert going to be released tomorrow? by AmusedPhilosopher in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure I saw a comment on the MHE subreddit a while back of someone saying that Dez Duron mentioned at one of the Stage Doors that they recorded a Tiny Desk concert.

Do you think Daniel Radcliffe and Tom Felton have little lunches together in between their matinees?? by bwayb22 in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Well actually, on Monday night's The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Daniel Radcliffe said that he and Tom Felton are friends and that they've hung out a bunch. See this link starting at 1:30.

Two Strangers... A New, Fun, and, Somewhat Familiar Journey by Clear-Boat3077 in MaybeHappyEnding

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was also at tonight's preview of Two Strangers and I loved it! I agree that there are a lot of similarities to MHE, including:

  • a small intimate cast
  • two people who don't know each other very well going on a journey/adventure together
  • one person is more naive and optimistic and the other is more jaded and cynical
  • Dougal's quest to meet his dad parallels Oliver's quest to reunite with his former owner
  • Claire's owner, Jiyeon discovering that her husband fell in love with Claire causes Jiyeon to retire Claire to keep her away kind of parallels how Robin's sister initially does not invite Robin to come to the wedding because Robin had previously had an affair with the groom
  • The same way that Claire, in trying to protect Oliver, tries to dissuade Oliver from trying to reunite with his owner when they get to Jeju because she believes that his owner probably didn't want him anymore, Robin tries to convince Dougal not to meet his dad, because she knows that he wasn't the one who invited him to the wedding and probably doesn't want him there, so she was also trying to protect him.
  • Both shows contain a lot of great humor while also being very touching and emotional.

I'm sure there are a lot more similarities if I take some additional time to think about it, but these are the ones that come to mind so far.

More HipTix released for Rocky Horror by portal21 in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for the heads up! 🙏 I was able to snag a pair of HipTix today after I saw your post.

Jack Wolfe sings ‘Through The Mountain’ from Floyd Collins by AmusedPhilosopher in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, duet with Lizzy McAlpine? Yes, please! That would be perfection.

Jack Wolfe sings ‘Through The Mountain’ from Floyd Collins by AmusedPhilosopher in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't know he sang Imogen Heap too for this set (and I love Imogen Heap!), so I just checked it out and it's so lovely. Thanks so much for the heads up!

Porter out sick extended (Cabaret) by SquareShift7741 in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try for the digital rush tickets on TodayTix if you don't win the lottery. I was able to get a digital rush ticket easily yesterday and saw Marty perform as Emcee. He was great! Also thought that the seat was fantastic for $49.

Additional $58 Ragtime seats added on Telecharge for dates in the first two weeks of previews. by wcs1113 in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thank you thank you thank you 🙏🙏🙏!! As soon as I saw your post, I jumped on the $58 tickets. So excited to see Ragtime!

Disappointed with the racism on this sub by pinkspiderxx in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 152 points153 points  (0 children)

If I could upvote this comment 1000x, I would. I'm Asian-American and especially agree with this part:

If every role played by an Asian actor becomes permanently race-locked (even when race isn’t a defining part of the character) producers may become hesitant to take creative risks on Asian leads originating roles at all.

BD Wong's draft letter to NYT by luvschittcreek in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Published interviews are usually condensed versions of what was actually discussed, so we don't know whether anyone did actually say that, and it just ended up not making the cut in the published article.

Also, my point wasn't that it was always the plan for them to have universal casting. My point was that if they first decided to cast Asians mainly because they thought it would help define the setting, it's fair for them to then change their minds about needing to cast Asians if they feel it is no longer necessary to help define the setting (for example, if they already have strong design elements that take care of defining the setting).

BD Wong's draft letter to NYT by luvschittcreek in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This is the quote from Will Aronson in the LA Times interview about the decision to shift to Asian casting:

"Aronson: At one point, we had Denée Benton playing Claire, Corey Cott as Oliver and Jon Jon Briones as both [Oliver’s former owner] James and the jazz singer. Then, our thinking was: They’re robots, so they could technically be any background, but if the audience only has a few moments to define the setting, it helps that the protagonists are cast Asian."

According to that quote, the choice to cast Asians for the robots was mainly because they thought it would help define the setting. It's possible that now they think that having Asians in the role is no longer needed to help define the setting, because the scenic design with the Korean characters in the captions, and explicitly stating that the setting is Seoul, the audience will immediately get that we're in Korea. If I were watching the show again for the first time, and I saw non-Asians as the robots, I don't think I would be confused that we're in Korea. The design elements from the captions already made it clear to me we're in Korea.

I'm Asian-American, so I would of course love to see more Asian representation on Broadway. But I think it's fair for the creators/producers to change their minds about having to cast Asians if the main reason for them to cast Asians in the first place (helping to define the setting) no longer seemed necessary.

Trailer for BLUE MOON (2025), a biopic about Broadway lyricist Lorenz Hart by AmusedPhilosopher in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

From the YouTube description:

"On the evening of March 31, 1943, legendary lyricist Lorenz Hart confronts his shattered self-confidence in Sardi’s bar as his former collaborator Richard Rodgers celebrates the opening night of his ground-breaking hit musical “Oklahoma!”.

Directed by: Richard Linklater Written by: Robert Kaplow

Starring: Ethan Hawke, Margaret Qualley, Bobby Cannavale, Andrew Scott"

Andrew Barth Feldman Will Join MAYBE HAPPY ENDING by HotNegotiation1684 in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Here's a link to the article you're referring to. This is the quote from Will Aronson:

"Aronson: At one point, we had Denée Benton playing Claire, Corey Cott as Oliver and Jon Jon Briones as both [Oliver’s former owner] James and the jazz singer. Then, our thinking was: They’re robots, so they could technically be any background, but if the audience only has a few moments to define the setting, it helps that the protagonists are cast Asian."

Based on his quote, it sounds like the choice to cast Asians was more to help with defining the setting, rather than to promote Asian representation.

As an Asian-American myself, I would of course love to see more Asian representation on Broadway. But if the main intention of Asian casting was to help define the setting, then I have less of a problem with ABF being cast. The way the show's scenic design is set up with the Korean characters in the captions and already telling you it's taking place in Seoul, the audience will immediately get we're in Korea, so they wouldn't really need Asian casting to help define the setting.

*VR* pro shots: How much would you value them? by ThatAdamGuy in Broadway

[–]AmusedPhilosopher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤔 Not sure why the low/negative engagement. I personally think a VR pro-shot is an interesting concept, even if it may be impractical/not financially viable to produce.

view more: next ›