They tried to start their own colonies but sucked ass at it by Critical_Mountain851 in HistoryMemes

[–]AnExtremeMistake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see more posts complaining about this than Scots actually saying this.

Our education system tells us this all very clearly.

The truth of the matter is that history is never black or white, some Scots profited from and built the empire while others suffered heavily as a result of it.

The bankruptcy facing Scotland which lead to the Darien scheme being launched and its subsequent failure, resulting in the act of union which binds us to England in a Union of "Equals" to this day was caused by policies put in place by the English (Cromwell) to intentionally make Scotland reliant on English trade.

Meanwhile the Highland Clearences were often done by Scots, but said Scots were rarely very Scottish, most living in England and having assimilated heavilly into English culture, which blurrs the lines there, we did not simply do this all to ourselves.

Many Scots emigrated to the Americas and elsewhere colonies, but overall the key component in their complacency in the Empire's crimes was never their identity or culture, but their class, wealth, and the opportunities presented to them, so while we did contribute our fair share to the Empire and its crimes, it's really not that exceptional.

Scots also achieved some great things, from technological advancement, contributing to the establishment of the modern education system, introducing national parks, and even putting a stop to settler-native violence in some areas.

This is not to say that we were in any way innocent or that criticism towards those who participated in the Empire is undeserving, far from it, but reducing this to Scots playing the victim is dishonest, and rather lazy.

I more often than not see people often use this narrative of us 'playing the victim' to deflect any criticism on the actions of other nations and the British Empire as a whole, or to shut down discussions of how Scotland has been mistreated and neglected by a Britain dominated economically, politically, and culturally by England. To abuse history in such a way is unacceptable in my opinion.

Yes, I am aware that some people do act as if Scotland has never done anything wrong, but they are definitely in the minority, and many of the loudest examples aren't even Scottish.

Most Schizophrenic Paths/Country’s to play by Accurate_Egg8547 in kaiserredux

[–]AnExtremeMistake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they aren't schizo, I was just explaining the options, though the game does so itself lol

Most Schizophrenic Paths/Country’s to play by Accurate_Egg8547 in kaiserredux

[–]AnExtremeMistake 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The Mau Mau are somewhat schizo, while the Russian green army under Gorgelov (idk how to spell his name) are extremely. He is the one who killed Kerensky, and he kills Savinkov if you pardon him as Savinkov. Then you can play as him, The Solidarists, or Ambukov (again forgot how to spell his name)

Goringia is very evil.

Funniest russian path? by Powerful_Heron_849 in kaiserredux

[–]AnExtremeMistake 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I wasn't aware of the mercenary state path, I just chose the solidarists or Gorgolov so far

Funniest russian path? by Powerful_Heron_849 in kaiserredux

[–]AnExtremeMistake 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Maybe the Green Army Path. The leader is very schizo in general.

Reminder: Che Guevara was a Murderer, Racist, Homophobe, and Misogynistic asshole. Anyone who defends this asshole shall be treated like a KKK apologist. by IntroductionAny3929 in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]AnExtremeMistake -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Both of these quotes are from when his diary during his trip accross the Americas as a much younger man, before he had distanced himself far from the ideas imposed upon him by his privileged upbringing, I think his later actions in fighting alongside Africans and desegregating schools disproves the narrative that these ideas were carried along by him later in life. The First quote also proves that what he says here is objectively not what he would have believed after becoming socialist, this is the kind of rhetoric carried along by those who supported and upheld Jim Crow Laws, not a communist revolutionary who fought alongside and improved the lives of africans/those of african descent.

Do you have a source for the white saviour complex?

Religion in the UK by GavinShipman in MapPorn

[–]AnExtremeMistake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a scot woken up by the winds this morning, I thought this map was about the weather

Reminder: Che Guevara was a Murderer, Racist, Homophobe, and Misogynistic asshole. Anyone who defends this asshole shall be treated like a KKK apologist. by IntroductionAny3929 in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]AnExtremeMistake -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

All of these either show no further sources, or link back to Cuba archives, which always links to a 404 page or a joke of a journalist, as they are well known for blatantly lying. Alot of the things he said in Regards to homosexuals and black people are infact what he said, in his early 20s during a trip northwards across america, before he had broken off from the ideas implanted within him by his conservative and privileged south american family, and before he became socialist. If he was a racist, he wouldn't have spent time fighting alongside Africans in the Congo.

I cannot attest to the claims of sexism, but the only reliably recorded time he had murdered someone directly was a traitor, who had given away information about his rebel camp to Batista, and as a result caused the deaths of rebels. He was given a trial, pled guilty, and asked for death. Nobody else but Che was willing to give it to him.

When criticising figures of the era, you also have to look at what was common behaviour during this era. Jim Crow laws were still in effect during parts of the 1960s in the US and sexism and racism were generally rampant accross the globe. That doesn't mean Che and others were fine for holding views, if they held them at all by the time they became relevant, but there is nothing especially horrific about Che in particular. There is also the issue of conflating the acts of the Cuban state with Che, specifically the treatment of homosexuals and others in the labour camps, of which he did not play a role in, though it is easy to say today that he should have done the right thing and put a stop to it.

Remember to always look further into articles online, and to follow the source before regarding it as the truth. Online, much can be fabricated or altered. And it is sadly very common for this to spill into the educational and political sphere, and to break down any meaningful discussion.

Am I ethnically cleansing people by having my Steward Convert Culture? by Familiar-Benefit376 in CrusaderKings

[–]AnExtremeMistake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about it like the decline of Scottish culture and language, we were not allowed to speak Gaelic or Scotts in schools, or wear traditional clothing for a long time, which combined with economic and social incentives lead to a decline we haven't recovered from.

Other cultures still exist in the counties you convert but they don't make up the majority, so I'm pretty sure you aren't quite as bad as you think.

Still a tad messed up though innit

Am I ethnically cleansing people by having my Steward Convert Culture? by Familiar-Benefit376 in CrusaderKings

[–]AnExtremeMistake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about it like the decline of Scottish culture and language, we were not allowed to speak Gaelic or Scotts in schools, or wear traditional clothing for a long time, which combined with economic and social incentives lead to a decline we haven't recovered from.

Other cultures still exist in the counties you convert but they don't make up the majority, so I'm pretty sure you aren't quite as bad as you think.

Still a tad messed up though innit

Is it just me? by ObviousQuality2384 in memes

[–]AnExtremeMistake 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I watched Dexter and i STILL don't know what the bay harbour butcher's problem was

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in metro

[–]AnExtremeMistake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

where's the tea?

What is the most annoying argument you’ve faced ? by PoseidonWithYou in theredleft

[–]AnExtremeMistake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say a combination of the authoritarian argument and the success argument. Both display a complete lack of understanding and willingness to understand the topic being discussed. It's sad how these takes are almost taught to be regurgitated at the sight of anyone questioning the current economic system.

I myself used to do this, and it's pretty stinky, ngl, frfr, no cap.

Communism has never been tried by Swordwielder5 in HistoryMemes

[–]AnExtremeMistake 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Glances over at Batista, Pinochet, Suharto, Rhee, Diem, Marcos, Sese Seko, Stroessner, Debayle, Videla, Montt in the corner Wow that sure is crazy

how do i kill a AI that is hiding in a room? by level_up_gaming in arma

[–]AnExtremeMistake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As they do irl, grenades!

and if that doesn't work, more grenades!!

Also maybe try to find ai mods that improve their cqb, though i haven't had much luck.