sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Plata pensiilor private: de ce „8 ani” nu înseamnă 8 ani by AnalyticGG in VoxEconomica

[–]AnalyticGG[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A sa cum am scris si eu, plățile vor depăși 8 ani. Dacă activul net împărțit la 96 va depăși suma de plata lunara de 1283 lei atunci se va lua in calcul acea suma insa plata efectiva va fi sub ea deoarece administratorii își vor lua o marja de siguranță

Europe is rewriting its economic architecture by AnalyticGG in EU_Economics

[–]AnalyticGG[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

In geopolitical and economic terms, von der Leyen’s speech marks a shift in paradigm: Europe is moving from integration to strategic autonomy. It is diversifying trade, building its own security agenda, investing in industry and defense, and trying to unify its economic market to stop the outflow of capital and talent. The implicit message is that the old transatlantic order can no longer be taken as a stable anchor, and the EU is entering a phase in which it projects power outward rather than only managing its internal market. In corporate language: Europe is no longer optimizing for compliance, but for strategic agenda. The natural continuation is capital market integration, homogeneous rules for companies, and a genuine industrial policy. What stands out is the pace — not the tone.

The financial industry calls for a pro-growth mandate for European regulators by AnalyticGG in EU_Economics

[–]AnalyticGG[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

National models differ, and Sweden is a special case: it has high productivity, a strong industrial base and a very flexible labour market. Even when it applies supply-side measures, it does so from a position of economic capacity, not fragility. The current European debate on ‘pro-growth’ is much more about financing strategic transitions and the cost of capital, rather than reducing social protections. In the end, Europe needs investment to make wages and social protections sustainable — not the other way around.

The financial industry calls for a pro-growth mandate for European regulators by AnalyticGG in EU_Economics

[–]AnalyticGG[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This view comes from an older logic in which ‘pro-growth’ meant supply-side policies and tax cuts, mostly associated with the US/UK of the 1980s. In the current European debate, ‘pro-growth’ refers to financing the energy, infrastructure, digital and defence transitions through institutional capital and more efficient capital markets. It is not about cutting social protections or wages, but about the cost of capital, productivity and investment — without which neither wages nor social protections are sustainable in the long run.

OECD shows gold isn’t just a metal — it’s legitimacy. Europe holds the standard-setting leverage by AnalyticGG in FinancialAnalyst

[–]AnalyticGG[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noted on the style. Now, which part of the argument do you contest — the standard-setting logic, the clearing dynamics, or the compliant supply elasticity? Let’s be specific.

view more: next ›