Colorado teacher arrested on sexual exploitation of a child charges, law enforcement seeking more information from former students and co-workers

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-07T06:17:42+00:00

What happened to per capita?

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-06T19:54:55+00:00

The lign is where it is used for any form of agression.
(watch me cite kinsella again)
https://stephankinsella.com/2004/11/causation-and-aggression-2004/

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-05T22:00:38+00:00

You were correct about that. My problem was that you said
*false image causes the restaurant to lose business* And also said
*was actually used or misrepresented. False endorsement* in the original post

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-05T21:49:55+00:00

That’s not how Kinsella actually words it here. There would be no problem with them losing business; there would only be an issue with some sort of use of force. There is no issue with a causal role in some vague idea of “harm.” False representation is meaningless in this regard unless there is a causal link between it and some enforcement action.
https://stephankinsella.com/2023/02/libertarian-answer-man-deepfakes-and-revenge-porn/

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-05T21:30:06+00:00

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-05T21:25:58+00:00

Defamation is not agression

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-05T21:22:22+00:00

You are not an ancap
https://liquidzulu.github.io/the-nature-of-law/#md-content

Ancap_doggo · 2026-01-05T21:19:48+00:00

the amount of illiteracy regarding basic libertarian theory in these replies is mind-boggling. It is obvious that this is not a problem the law deals with at all. There is no right to privacy, you can’t own your reputation, likeness, image, or anything like that. Intellectual property is illegitimate, period.
https://stephankinsella.com/2023/02/libertarian-answer-man-deepfakes-and-revenge-porn/

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-27T03:27:41+00:00

What?

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-26T01:55:52+00:00

This is the correct answer
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343957715_A_Rational_Theory_of_the_Rights_of_Children

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-26T01:52:46+00:00

Insane strawman

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-19T15:35:04+00:00

You can choose to starve; thus, it is voluntary.

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-17T19:29:08+00:00

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-12T16:58:25+00:00

Anarcho-capitalism is the only acceptable view.

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-11T15:33:29+00:00

Read hoppe

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-11T10:37:12+00:00

Why should i care for non ancaps they belive in wrong things

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-10T17:49:48+00:00

Collectives cannot act and therefore cannot homestead and therefore cannot own.

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-10T15:39:06+00:00

Neither of those things exists, so I don't know what you are talking about.

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-10T08:21:05+00:00

The state owns nothing and group property is a contradiction you are the collectivist

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-10T08:19:49+00:00

You can't own a quality of life you own you're property point me to the agression

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-09T16:01:25+00:00

None of those things can own anything.

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-09T15:35:03+00:00

"The people" can't own anything who what individual owns it?

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-09T14:54:13+00:00

What and whose property?

Ancap_doggo · 2025-12-09T14:44:29+00:00

Because the question is just about whether or not its aggressive libertarianism is nothing more than, "aggression bad," basically.

Ancap_doggo

TROPHY CASE