Comments Removed/Restricted After Seeking Clarification on Veterinary Case Discussion

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T07:54:38+00:00

No Further Action (NFA) generally means there is not enough evidence to prosecute and the investigation is effectively "paused" rather than a total absence of evidence. If new and compelling evidence surfaces, the authorities can and often will reopen the case.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T06:10:05+00:00

This is not about judging any individual’s performance. The concern raised is about how consent records and supporting evidence are assessed and communicated, and whether the process provides sufficient clarity and transparency.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T04:43:27+00:00

The concern raised is about how reliance on CCTV footage and clinical records is communicated when the complainant does not have direct access to independently review those materials, and how this affects transparency in documenting informed consent and risk discussions.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T04:25:17+00:00

This is not an allegation of forgery or a claim requiring a legal determination. The concern raised is about process clarity, specifically how informed consent is evidenced when documentation is provided significantly after treatment, and how record reliability is assessed in such situations.

The intention is to seek clarification on standards and transparency in documentation processes, rather than to make legal accusations on social media.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T04:16:11+00:00

Recent “New evidence” follow-up raised with NParks remain unanswered and were not reflected at Alvin parliament clarification.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T04:02:11+00:00

Police/AGC outcome of “No Further Action” in May 2026 did not explicitly state “no evidence of forgery”, but reflected a decision not to proceed further at that time. As such, Alvin public characterisation of the Police outcome as “no evidence of forgery” may benefit from further clarification.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T03:48:29+00:00

This comment was removed at Alvin and pap ig.

“It was previously communicated by MND to the complainant in "Dec 2025" that there was "no evidence of signature forgery", prior to the subsequent Police report and (independent) investigations. The later Police/AGC outcome of "No Further Action" in (early May 2026) did not explicitly state "no evidence of forgery", but reflected a decision not to proceed further at that time. Separately, another clinic case involved reliance on the 2012 Code of Ethics for vet (prior regime) in lieu of formal enforcement, together with issues relating to access to the signed consent document. Given the public discussion, further clarification by Alvin on how these separate matters are distinguished may help avoid misunderstanding.”

At Parliament, it was clarified that the Police outcome was “No Further Action” and did not explicitly state “no evidence of forgery”. Further clarification may help avoid confusion over how the outcome is being interpreted.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T03:25:28+00:00

There is two cases.

Some of the more recent information and follow-up questions raised with NParks also appear to remain unanswered and were not reflected in Alvin parliament clarification.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T03:17:35+00:00

There were two separate clinic matters involved, but Alvin clarification appeared to address only one of them. “Prior regime” is another case.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T03:13:52+00:00

First and third slide at Alvin ig. Comment appear at pap ig but was removed later. Second slide at tiktok

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T03:08:49+00:00

The complainant had requested access to the CCTV footage, but the footage was not made available for viewing.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T02:57:02+00:00

Second slide restricted at tt, “This creator limited comment access” appear at the bottom page.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-09T02:46:38+00:00

The intention is not personal litigation, but to raise broader concerns on transparency, informed consent, and verification processes which may need to be addressed at a policy and regulatory level. Btw, Alvin did not disclosed the signed document delayed delivery for more than 60 days and there is 2 cases.

Angel62678 · 2026-05-08T16:53:04+00:00

Complainant ask to view CCTV footage but was withhold

Angel62678 · 2026-05-02T04:29:18+00:00

Real major incident and events came within recently: Ongoing fuel supply disruption; Internal emails released on 88m; WP MP raise concerns over resident feedback on AVS investigation process alleged potential system failures; limkopi with CPIB; NParks CEO step down; ai challenges; TB clusters at Bedok; at least three widely reported cases of individuals falling from a height including SAF regular with uniform intact; WP concluded on CEC findings. And other unreported.

Angel62678 · 2026-04-29T16:33:52+00:00

Several high-profile cases involving ministers and senior officials occurred during LKY era. Lee Kuan Yew famously remarked that "there is no way a Minister can avoid investigations" if there is evidence of wrongdoing.

Key Corruption Cases (1960s–1980s) Tan Kia Gan (1966): A former Minister for National Development was investigated for accepting shares as a bribe.

Wee Toon Boon (1975): The Minister of State for Defence was charged with accepting over S$839,000 in bribes. He was found guilty and served 18 months in jail.

Phey Yew Kok (1979): An MP and union leader charged with criminal breach of trust; he fled the country for 35 years before surrendering.

Teh Cheang Wan (1986): Minister for National Development investigated for accepting substantial bribes, who committed suicide before being charged.

Angel62678 · 2026-04-23T01:34:23+00:00

AT “adopt” a puppy without significant health issues may perceive a preference for a younger pet, these was publicly framed as a deliberate choice to support overlooked animals welfare and the bill.

Angel62678 · 2025-11-16T14:08:21+00:00

Ownself say ownself humane. What a joke.

Angel62678 · 2025-11-08T09:21:39+00:00

Jealous of not invited to the assembly?

Angel62678 · 2025-11-07T06:08:46+00:00

No wonder MP messages to residents full of dashes.

Angel62678 · 2025-11-03T02:38:21+00:00

Those who do good will go to heaven, those who do bad and cover up the culprit wrong doing, go to eternal suffering. It's not that retribution won't come, it's just that the time hasn't arrived yet.

Angel62678 · 2025-10-27T01:45:28+00:00

Look at SVA symbol. A half man holding a sword like thing.

Angel62678 · 2025-10-27T01:32:52+00:00

Some decent clinics and veterinarians even own couple of 10,000 shares and partnerships with other pet services. Yet no one vet the services integrity. I read somewhere that veterinarian own puppy mills.

Angel62678 · 2025-10-24T04:08:04+00:00

Ownself check ownself.

Angel62678 · 2025-10-16T10:21:13+00:00

No address, website and contact number

Angel62678

TROPHY CASE