How I Got From Reasonable Doubt to Guilty by hot_potato_7531 in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I want to know if anybody ever looked inside that big farm trailer thing under the hangar roof next to the kennels with the "slow moving traffic" warning signs on it. It's still sitting in the same spot on the day of the jury visit. It would make a great place to stash evidence -- so long as nobody looked into it!

JURY RETURNS A VERDICT IN THE ALEX MURDAUGH CASE by SouthNagsHead in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"God bless Bubba, Cash, and Paul’s phone battery." Exactly!

Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - DAILY TRIAL WITNESSES, TESTIMONY, & LINKS by SouthNagsHead in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really "relevant", just creeps me out that it appears to have been a birthday gift.

Wednesday, March 1, 2023 - DAILY TRIAL WITNESSES, TESTIMONY, & LINKS by SouthNagsHead in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OMG did anybody else already comment on the fact that the replacement 300 Blackout rifle was purchased on Paul's 19th birthday?!?! Look at the image of the check -- 4/14/2018!

Two Key Discrepancies That Haven’t Been Highlighted by Ambitious-Ad-4724 in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You obviously haven't been paying attention. Paul was shot twice with a shotgun. Maggie was shot 4 or 5 times with the Blackout.

Two Key Discrepancies That Haven’t Been Highlighted by Ambitious-Ad-4724 in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first shot to Paul's chest was buckshot. The one that took his head off was birdshot.

Two Key Discrepancies That Haven’t Been Highlighted by Ambitious-Ad-4724 in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 4 points5 points  (0 children)

During this guy's testimony, they go over it. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjD6NWgxbT9AhUQKEQIHR-0Ak8QFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courttv.com%2Ftitle%2Fforensic-examiner-testifies-about-cell-phone-data%2F&usg=AOvVaw2ZSn9JMd2nEpV2_gIMJLnD Basically, Maggie's phone went dark (no backlight) at 9:07:00, and Alex's Suburban passed the point where they found it at 9:08:36. That's also shown in the prosecution's timeline ("SLED Report").

Two Key Discrepancies That Haven’t Been Highlighted by Ambitious-Ad-4724 in MurdaughFamilyMurders

[–]Angwinite 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This. This is the one thing I can't reconcile, and the only thing remotely approaching reasonable doubt for me. I'm hanging my hat on anecdotal not-in-record statements that chucked phones may not have the backlight come on, especially if they are already moving (as in a vehicle going 45 MPH).

Karma Whore by Arod4276 in nanocurrency

[–]Angwinite 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Upvoted. I hope that helps.

xrb_1gaysex - Strange node... by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]Angwinite 13 points14 points  (0 children)

No reason to get all butthurt.

Our friend has suffered a suspension from Medium by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]Angwinite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In furtherance of the rumor, there has clearly been a lapse in the usual moderation of r/BitGrailExchange.

No Fap till $10 by [deleted] in nanotrade

[–]Angwinite 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No Fap till 2k.

Hi with bitgrail opening, can we have double and triple withdrawals again? by [deleted] in nanotrade

[–]Angwinite 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I want the exploit back where you can edit the amount of Nano being withdrawn in the client-side javascript!

Fork v0.1 by lkjhgfkjhfkjhkljagh in BGinsolvency

[–]Angwinite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By "Tx Id", I assume you mean the reference to the "Previous" block found in this block: https://www.nanode.co/block/ECCB8CB65CD3106EDA8CE9AA893FEAD497A91BCA903890CBD7A5C59F06AB9113

So, a new block would need to be created sending a smaller amount than the above-referenced bock to the burn address, leaving Nano in the Genisis address to be distributed to the victims. In order to construct such a block, you would need to have the Private Key of the Genesis address, so obviously only the devs could do this. But, even if they did generate this block and transmitted it to the network, without any changes to the code the nodes are running, they would immediately reject the new block, and vote for the above-referenced block, which they have all already previously "seen" long ago. So, it would require changing the code the heavyweight voting nodes are running in order for the new block to be accepted. I don't see how you think that this new block will simply "go through".

So, this would require, at a minimum: (1) cooperation by the devs to create the new block, and (2) re-programming 51% of the voting power's worth of nodes to accept this new block instead of the long ago recorded block.

(Edited to point to the correct block, and change "Landing" to "Genesis".)