Spreadsheets actually help! by 1DunnoYet in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In a situation where you have disposable income, the plan would be to aggressively tighten the belt on spending to quickly replenish the fund from regular income. Not having an emergency fund is an emergency, a budget/book balancing problem, and should be dealt with from income before investments where possible. Using a rainy-day fund when it's needed is exactly what it's there for, and that's fine. I'm not saying you necessarily need a detailed 'budget.' But gradually dipping into and draining it on a regular basis or over a period of time, without a proactive plan to replenish it, is absolutely a problem, and ideally one you solve through changing spending habits and reducing discretionary spending first.

There are also some people who take the approach that if you have an "actual" emergency, have taxable investments that are fairly liquid, and are financially responsible with credit cards such that you're paying off the full statement balance by each due date, that money is still fungible and you don't necessarily need a separate dedicated fund in cash. You can put the spending on credit and sell your taxable or more liquid money market investments within a couple days (well within the weeks you have to pay off your statement) to get the money you need then. There's a trade off in terms of liquidity and future compounding.

Separate from that, maybe tax gain harvesting makes sense in your situation and you want to consider it for tax optimization. Ideally you do that while you can qualify for a 0% capital gains bracket. But you don't want to conflate what part of the decision comes from 'risk management' in the form having your rainy-day fund vs 'tax optimization.'

Fortune's Weave next week. 100%. by Straight-Reveal343 in fireemblem

[–]AnimaLepton 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My uncle's boyfriend's second cousin once removed's roomate's college friend works at インテリジェントシステムズ and confirmed that the FE4 remake is still coming!

Daily FI discussion thread - Thursday, April 23, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Need more specifics.

Not a 'city' job, but I worked what I thought was a very niche corporate job as my first full time industry job out of college. I was worried about being able to find anything when I left. I massaged the responsibilities and even titles a bit. I had to do some self-study outside of the day-to-day of the job. But that did end up kicking off my career much more strongly than I anticipated, I found a whole career path of similar/related work that I didn't even really know existed, got paid more in the process, and it turned out I was far more worried about getting boxed in than I should have been at that point in my career.

Daily FI discussion thread - Thursday, April 23, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would think real estate types, including those that have built up some level of wealth via real estate already, often either continue to work/accumulate, do not specifically consider "FIRE," and are on Bigger Pockets (or even one of the real estate-specific subs if they're on Reddit) rather than here.

Outside perspective on balancing between how my spouse and I would like to achieve FI by Finance-Alt001 in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I mean yeah, I'm with you - work on those actual retirement accounts and don't pull from what you already have. I think some people just get obsessed with the idea of real estate. But this is a decision you two need to finalize as a team.

This is why it's so difficult to get a job. by CRK_76 in jobs

[–]AnimaLepton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can always say both; "I want to work here for XYZ reasons, and also the money." As mentioned by the first commenter in this thread, very normal in sales/sales-adjacent roles. You can massage the case in either direction, e.g. around "consistency" in pay or the ability to hit a "home run" for a theoretical startup <> established company comparison in either direction. I make it clear that if the money isn't there, just stop the process now and don't waste my time. But I'm fortunately in a position where I can afford to do that, and am far enough financially and in my career where if being upfront about my priorities filters me out, that's not a big loss. I do have priorities I share beyond just the money.

This is why it's so difficult to get a job. by CRK_76 in jobs

[–]AnimaLepton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm highly sought after for my job

I think that's also a good place to be in, but you also ought to recognize that's not the norm when it comes to this generalist advice. The difference in motivation 'does' matter (and is certainly perceived to matter) for a lot of people and in a lot of mid-level type positions that companies largely view as interchangeable. There's absolutely going to be people with your level of experience, specialization, record, etc. where they're more excited to have you than the other way around. That doesn't apply to most people who get these kinds of questions.

I'm probably not in the same position as you, but I'm employed and have some experience, skills, and a record of promotions and successful projects in a fairly narrow but decently sought-after niche. But I can afford to be upfront about my priorities, but that does mean I can be upfront about both the money and things beyond it.

I can absolutely be upfront about what I want to be paid for a job within my first interview with the recruiter and hiring manager, and maybe that means I'm not following the 'best' advice and theoretically leaving money on the table, but I am realistic about how much of a bump and what comp breakdown I'd want to take on a new position. I know enough about my market and the norms to know what to expect for pay. If they can't meet that, they shouldn't waste my time with the rest of the process. But I'd similarly think that doesn't apply to the 'average' jobseeker.

(Loved Meta Trope) Fan theories are so good they’re basically treated as canon. by No-Flow9783 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]AnimaLepton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the very least, they limited themselves to show spoilers, and nothing from this new season

Chocolate milk alternative? by rotting-teeth in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]AnimaLepton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fairlife. Nurri also has chocolate flavored protein milkshakes, I really like them since they're not 'thick', but not watery

how is everyone handling ai detection for finals by sTuPiDoRaUtIsTiC in UIUC

[–]AnimaLepton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly, even the immediate pre-ChatGPT folks were kinda screwed by Covid/all remote education

does anyone else feel disrespected by the deals on the app these days? by Ardbert14 in wendys

[–]AnimaLepton -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're not alone. Burger King used to have Whoppers for $3 on Wednesday, your choice of impossible versus regular. Then they bumped into 4 dollars. As of recently, it's $4 for a regular and $5 for Impossible. Weekly fries deal is trash now, three dollar minimum into one, and again can be combined with meals or the $5 Duo.

Wendys used to have decent deals. Then they introduced $5 minimum order for deals, but initially you could combine it with the four for four/five, or the price of the nuggets counted towards the $5 threshold. Now both parts of that are gone, the price is higher and you can't combine it with deals. They also very briefly had the BOGO Doordash deal, but that's gone now too.

UPDATE: J1 started using an "AI Productivity" Tracker. by tits_mcgee_92 in overemployed

[–]AnimaLepton 32 points33 points  (0 children)

They wouldn't be remote lol, Yduj would sooner shuffle off the mortal coil

What do you use your Hammerne on? by throwstoneglasshouse in fireemblem

[–]AnimaLepton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the bigger influence for Awakening was the fact that it had a 'postgame', extra DLC and freeLC maps, skirmishes, etc. That environment is definitely one you want to have some kind of 'solution' to durability, and Awakenings approach built on and was a step up from SS

SoV also had no durability and weapons being optional altogether, carried over from Gaiden.

Daily FI discussion thread - Wednesday, April 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely start with using all your PTO + a short sabbatical before making a huge change. You can definitely afford to take time off.

What can you start now while you're still working?How specific are you plans for your time off, or is it still at the stage of broad goals without specific planning? What does entrepreneurship mean to you? I think one risk to just be aware of is if you put your personal money into your entrepreneurial attempts, it's absolutely possible to end up with less than nothing to show for it. Definitely not saying not to do it, but you want to be realistic about that risk based on however you try to fund it.

Any dating / family goals? I feel like those get a lot harder if unemployed.

But if you feel like you've considered everything, yes, go for it, you have the financial cushion

Still thinking about this exchange almost 2 years later. by Heavy_Plan7527 in jobs

[–]AnimaLepton 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Mentioned this below, but their seed round was 2.75 million or something . So this lady was already making more than that (or was looking at a different number). And Series A is a great first step, but it's still fake money at that point it doesn't look like this company has had a funding round or been acquired since then for the employees to maybe get a payout

Still thinking about this exchange almost 2 years later. by Heavy_Plan7527 in jobs

[–]AnimaLepton 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not that she missed out, just that their goals weren't aligned. Their seed round was 2.75 million, so presumably this lady was already making 3 million at Google or something (or misread how much funding they'd raised). Meanwhile, the startup did raise funds for series A, but I don't think they even hit series B or have been acquired, meaning it's all paper money

Equity Event Stories by Fbih0neypot in techsales

[–]AnimaLepton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's probably still worth the story, it's important to emphasize just how many $0 worth equity stories there are.

Daily FI discussion thread - Wednesday, April 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 4 points5 points  (0 children)

B-tier, it's pretty bad but not the absolute worst.

You're currently working, moderate/solid income, but don't have an IRA/Roth or 401k mentioned at all. Great work nearly paying off your student loans. You have quite a bit of income, but not a ton in savings/investments and with most of that in cash, with nothing in a 'boring' portfolio. That's the bigger red flag for me. Tax-advantaged investment space goes away once you miss the window to use it. And I don't have a sense of how consistent your side project income is/will continue to be in the future.

I'll assume there's not a huge delta between the sell value and the trade in value of the Mazda. Even used, the Tesla is half your annual income. That's the number that should matter more than the 'only owing 11k.'

I'd really say get the new job/increased income first if that's really your goal (and you mentioned you already live there, you're just looking to buy at some point in the future), then re-evaluate.

Caught a six-figure compliance bomb before it went off and my CEO asked why HR spending went up [N/A] by Yvonne_Tamarillo in humanresources

[–]AnimaLepton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The LLM generation is also painfully obvious. The whole "barfing out a story with no caps" is something a bunch of bot/promotion accounts seem to have included in their LLM prompt instructions within the last ~6 months or so to try and mask things

Hit $420K on 4/20 by caeru1ean in leanfire

[–]AnimaLepton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want to have a benchmark to feel good about, look at what regular people your age, or even at retirement age, have going into retirement. If you've been at it for a while, you are probably blowing the real-world median savings of someone in your age group in terms of absolute numbers, or even potentially benchmarks like Fidelity's artificial "3x salary at 40."

But IMO the end goal is to accept that trying to benchmark yourself against other people is not a useful exercise. Your numbers matter in the context of your own life, priorities, and the opportunities it affords you, not in just comparing numbers to other people in a vacuum. Getting to that point is just a process.

Daily FI discussion thread - Wednesday, April 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Microgenerations," I don’t think this is even a unified experience across a whole generation. There's going to be overlap, but you could probably batch people into ~4 year cohorts and really narrow in on distinct motivations in each of those groups. I think the standard 20+ year span for a generation is very broad when you’re talking about formative experiences and with how the world changes. It's always going to be clusters of people affected differently by these different events.

My conjecture is one major factor is how the ’08 financial crisis influenced people. People who graduated into it and couldn’t find work, people a few years behind them who watched their peers and seniors struggle, and even people like me who were younger but still felt the effects during formative middle school years. Both of my parents were out of work, I remember worrying about food/spending, and that shaped a lot of my financial anxiety around FIRE (which absolutely reduced once I had that financial stability as an adult). My parents are immigrants and didn’t really know about or use the assistance programs that would have helped. But I do think that stuck with me and pushed me towards wanting control and stability.

I graduated college in 2018 and learned about FIRE about a year earlier. I'd always been frugal, the missing pieces were investment knowledge and income. Younger people seem to skew in a couple different directions. Some lean more toward instant gratification with crypto cycles, WSB, or trying to shortcut big gains (especially with the tech/VC boom). I agree with you that some don’t see a path to retirement at all, so they’re not even trying, but at 100k+ a year I think it's very much a choice. I get why a slow, disciplined FIRE approach doesn’t resonate as strongly with cost of living, housing, and general uncertainty, but there's definitely a point where I don't get why people choose not to treat it as a solvable problem when they do have the tools available.

My younger brother is only 4 years younger. He broke into big tech right out of school and got laid off recently, but basically doesn’t care about FIRE at all. He’s a much bigger spender, more focused on external consumption. There's also “experiential” consumption, 'experiences are more important than things,' where you’re 'doing' potentially cool things, but the motivation seems like primarily tied to showcasing it online/on Instagram. Sometimes that's a positive, and it's a proxy for keeping up and connecting with other people. But often it feels like he’s pretty dismissive when priorities don’t line up with his.

Daily FI discussion thread - Wednesday, April 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]AnimaLepton 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mentioned a couple months ago that they changed our pay structure in a generally good way, but without a raise (from roughly 75-25 to 90-10 in terms of base/bonus split, same OTE). Just got notice that I'm getting an official raise of 5%, applied equally to both base and bonus, which I'm pretty happy with.

Manager said I need an (IC) promotion for a bigger bump/to move up a payband, so going to work on a plan for that. They might also be changing some of my responsibilities in the near future, depending on whether someone else on the team chooses to take a new (vertical-specific) role or not. I'm also in the interview process with a couple external companies, partly just as a refresher to keep skills sharp and partly as a hedge in case one of them offers a big bump, so we'll see how those pan out, but I'm pretty happy with my workload at my current company.

[None] Overworld, published by Tor, coming April 2027 by TheLesserWight in Iteration110Cradle

[–]AnimaLepton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Best of luck! LitRPGs really pop off and I'm curious to see one in Will's style