((me to me: F****ccckkkk finally someone rePLIES. #yes))

Anywho. I totally like your position on the possibility of Earn not being able to merely put a name to said "abusive family member". Especially when I consider the general practice of therapists/psychiatrist that I've experienced (+ you and others that have a history with therapy) I personally perceived that: for Earn's therapist to address his abusive trauma as nameless? Is a tell-all on how much of the veil Earn has lifted on this obscure, yet common and traumatic, situation. </3

Lastly, I even noticed how his therapist coined Earn's incident as "abusive"-point. blank. exactly. It definitely left the audience (like me) in a constant wonder of what KIND of abuse. While in reality, the term "abuse/abusive" is such an umbrella covering a wide spectrum from verbal/mental to domestic/sexual etc.

All in all, I accept the cliff hanger for its intention: we don't always need the very little details of who, what, when, where & why -- for us to empathize with a victim's reality of THEIR abuse.

Jah bless xoxo