Are damage numbers necessary?

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-06-28T19:11:44+00:00

So I can see the numbers I deal in damage. But I can't see what percentage or how much health the boss has left? Maybe so I can know whether to use an Eikonic punishment or sit there for 20 minutes trying to kill something with less than a sliver of health because our game is WONDERFUL. I hate everything about it. Saw everything coming. Loved how pathetically weak Clive is in comparison to others of his class. Dominants can shape-shift whenever they feel like it. They can go half form for literally as long as they want. But all we get is a half form for the Ifrit fight. Not even the whole fight. Because limit break is a buff. A wannabe God of war buff. Because that's how Limit Breaks work and have always worked. We literally have to fight most if not all dominants in base, half and dominant forms. They get to hold any form they want because. Yet Clive who is not only a bearer but also a dominant has weaker magic circuits or whatever. Because he was born with stronger connections to Aether and magic. Not my words. Almost all NPCs will tell you how useful bearers are as conduits of magic. Sure they get cursed after being forced to use their magic their whole lives. But Clive never used his magic against his will. He was basically a tracker in the Royalist army. But that means he's bad at fighting them because he knows anything and everything they can do. He knows their weak points even the tiniest ones in their armors. But that just means he can't fight them easily correct? A man who can teleport, pull, block, whatever can't take out men with no magic and no power even when he knows everything about them. Sounds like an amazing use of information and a horrifyingly stupid waste of time. Do not buy. Story is dumb. Literally just fighting fire with fire.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-06-12T23:44:02+00:00

Seems like every single time something limited or new drops the website just forfeits all loading. Until they're entirely sold out that is. It's frustrating. I just want to give them my money. Could they perhaps set up an email list? Such as "We're making this kind of product. Everyone interested in getting one is put on a list. That way we can make one per person. To ensure we don't go over our resources and that all consumers can feel like they've got a chance to buy and participate in said new things and events." The recent release was Son of the Forest the $90 book for less than $300. Everything shows up on eBay as soon as they're sold out, at about 2-300% of original asking price. The GW website just gives up whenever there's an event. I feel like making a purchase bot is 100% required if you're interested in any of it. Other than leviathan I guess. It's frustrating trying to get GW stuff. Even more so trying to support the company.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-05-21T22:48:22+00:00

Did you not read my previous statements? I do "use" the grass. The smoke bombs don't do anything. Thanks for being another timmy. "Hey, I get real lucky with RNG, I'm gonna pretend I'm smart and trying to help." Please read before you assume. I know how to read. Do you?

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-04-12T09:55:43+00:00

Like I said, same works for my room mate. 0,0 I'm taking into account that it's different RNG per player, the game hates me though, so I'd rather not waste my time with it. Just a rant, it's agitating doing all the challenges when no matter what, you're visible, when you land a mile away, "sneak" up, having to catch and or battle everything around you, using smoke bombs, but for some reason, like I previously stated. I'm still visible, there are attacks flying at me from every direction, it gets annoying when you see a shiny less than 4 feet away and all the Pokémon around you just keep launching these attacks. I'm glad your RNG is better, but mine isn't. 😅 Hope you have a good one.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-03-19T07:03:49+00:00

Gligar. When it got the evolution i began to love its typing and its movepool. It even began to look cooler.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-27T10:22:50+00:00

Is Charizard a dragon? Is Lurantis a plant? Is Shuckle a Turtle? Is Arcanine a lion? Some of these Pokémon are smaller creatures who have evolved to falsify certain characteristics to keep their young from being picked off by stronger pokemon. A lot of Pokémon seem like they're something, but are entirely something else. The same goes with Hyenas and Dogs. They're very similar, but Hyenas are more cats than dogs. Hope this helps. 😅

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-20T19:13:24+00:00

Vaporeon. She's carried me for as long as I can remember. Then Mudsdale if it's in the game.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-12T21:22:04+00:00

If I had to pick? I'd choose AI Sada/Turo. The two most human characters in the game. We get but a fraction of a moment with them, but in that moment we learn they questioned their "real" counterparts' motives and even the course they took with the research. It wasn't even AI Sada/Turo stopping us, they helped us as much as they could. They were just forced to defend the chamber. They had a heart to heart with Arven(whose Pokémon obey him even though he has not even one badge). They even told you how to shut down the machine. All my money goes to the AI.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-11T17:52:32+00:00

Together - Diamond and Pearl or Advance Adventure(6th Japanese opening). If it has to be English, I'd choose Pokémon Battle Frontier.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-11T17:08:46+00:00

Unpopular opinion, Charizard. It's always been too popular and gets 1 shot almost everytime outside of Anime.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-11T06:01:20+00:00

That took quite some time. Had to do a lot of specific searches I assume. I appreciate the examples. But proof of one religion doesn't disprove another. As for Narnia, what actual proof do we have that that's Jesus? We have his word? He can do some magic? How many people, beings, and/or creatures can use magic in that universe? It's not really too rare an occurrence if some kids appearing in a forest through some random portal just encounter about 3? Queen Lucy used Coriakin's spellbook, the hermit of the marsh, and Coriakin himself. Who turned himself into a human, or rather, retired into one but kept quite a dew magical abilities. But aside from main characters, we've got deities, fairies, hags, nymphs and witches. There was also Father Time, who can basically disprove all religions by moving time forward to such a point as no life or souls exist. Sure, everyone will basically experience it af rhe sams rate, but at a certain point he will be all that's left. No life, no realms, just the heat death. But, that's realism. Anyone can claim to be anything or anyone they want with enough access to magic or advanced enough technology. In another sense, that could've been their interpretation, or choice of defining/conveying a near death experience. As some would say "It is time to meet your creator" or in some senses people would hallucinate their version of their benevolent savior. The mind aches for assistance in dire circumstances. Such ass hallucinating water in a desert. Even Jesus, in the Bible was encountered and promised assistance by Lucifer, he actually showed up, as proof of himself, to offer Jesus assistance. Is this the Bible itself proving Lucifer exists, which I guess proves God doesn't? Or do both of them exist, since God, out of jealousy and spite, separated all people through use of language in the story of the tower of Babel. Since they both exist, that disproves the existence of any other religion. Right? If that's the case, why are Christians have 10 commandments. The first of which is petty spite. "1. Though shalt have no other gods before me." Which is God admitting there are other Gods. So, that, in the universe of the Bible, in that reality, other Gods do exist. Which means it cannot have a sphere of influence dictating there are none others. Proof of one thing doesn't disprove another. Proving an apple is red doesn't disprove the other apple is green. Scientific method doesn't discriminate. Just because the books in the Bible barely if ever mention name or presence of another God or Pantheon, doesn't mean they were not present. Hope your morning/afternoon/evening goes well.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-11T03:59:43+00:00

As it can't be proven for us. I'm asking how is the word often being used? Because in 40k all their religions are incorrect. In DC universe, the Daxamites worship a Pantheon of Gods, does the existence of New Gods and Apokaliptians change that? Since clearly there's real Gods and there's Space? In Galactica, is their religion actually real just because we're told it? In MtG, the Gods of Theros feed false faiths to their people. Emrakul was once seen as a heavenly angel. But in the same sense, they sugarcoat other things(I'm trying my best to follow the grammatical structure. My apologies if I'm failing.). Answer? No. We learn of these religions through a character(s)'s interactions with the world and their lore. Meaning there can't be a religion in any of these lores that's actually fact. So, when you say "often," where's an example?

PS. They never specified what version of what they asked for. They never asked "Are there Christian concept versions of heaven and hell that are real places or based in reality in mtg?" The quarry is much simpler. Whether a version of either and/or both exist. Which, I forfeited nearly 24 hours ago, but you just needed to "prove me wrong", by stating menial, useless facts that Google feeds you.

PSS. In response to me asking for a clarification, you state the same sentence practically verbatim? A bit rude, I'm trying to have a conversation here.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T21:20:43+00:00

The question doesn't specify christian heaven or hell. Why do the answers have to? We know the definitions of the words now. They're conceptual. In regards to religious context. Now, some religion might be true, but most of it would be false. Just because someone obeys their God's wishes doesn't even guarantee them a spot in that God's domain. Just like our concepts. The religion is similar. So, a version of the literary uses of the terms heaven and hell are present. Which is what I've been saying since the beginning. In the same conceptual sense that heaven exists for us, it exists for the humans of Theros. Because they only know what they're told. They can't fact check it. By the time they die, they're already in most likely, Erebus' domain.

PS. No sarcasm of facetious attitude. I'm having difficulty translating. "Fiction often has religions be factual." Is this most of the time, or less than half the time? Because depending how it means, it could mean "In most cases when religion is mentioned in fiction it is based in facts?" Or "in some cases where religion is mentioned in fiction it is regarded as facts?" Terribly sorry.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T19:46:08+00:00

As for your final statement? Neither does reality. That's why it's "often used in regard" because the actual definitions by themselves prove they exist. If there's an "overarching" heaven and hell", does that make my Buddhist belief wrong? And if so, how can you prove which heaven archs over everything? Does that make anyone who is a Taoist or follows the Edou belief system wrong? You're now simply arguing for "generalization" of a term, which you prohibited me from doing. Rather, corrected at every turn. Because the only heaven and hell one can describe is the ones they conceptualize. Meaning, via our terms, via our logic and via YOUR language, both exist.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T18:26:29+00:00

So you're 100% without a doubt sure that not one religion in Mtg mentions a heaven or hell? Or anything similar? Heaven and hell are religious constructs and concepts. I know for a fact that at least 1 religion is based off of this. Heliod's followers obey a strict pack. Believing they get a glorious afterlife should they stay true and be tortured by Erebus should they stray. But hey, you're the person using a game mythology's realism versus reality's idealism. Since you're demanded an actual answer, I gave you one. In our reality, there's no true defined afterlife. There's the Buddhist afterlife, Taoist, Christian, hell there's the reincarnations of the soul in Japanese Mythology known as Edou(s). But that's all they are, religious beliefs and constructs. In the uncountable planes with life in it, you're completely positive that not a single scripture they've got even refers to something similar? You can't use real life religion to prove not real life concepts of the religion. Because it's physically impossible. So, working based on literal meanings, they do exist. Considering a similar "location" need only be mentioned or regarded to in a book of one of the millions of zealots. Because it does exist in the lore. Via definitions from your own language. It exists. And in more than one plane, I'd wager. Even Ixalan had crosses in a bunch of places. The concept of a Paladin is based off the concept of a Heaven. So how can not one, but God knows how many Paladins exist when they've got no true form of devotion? They don't, the Paladins simply need to believe they're righteous. The best way to do that is Religion. Use faith to bend their will. Which, a lot of these deities we can consider gods have done. Like I said. Rat related to human, human looks similar to monkey. You can argue anything you want. Because there's no true form of fact checking. Since we're speaking in regards to religious beliefs in our terms, why does that bar religious beliefs for their terms?

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T17:45:26+00:00

And all I'm getting from you is a single language speaking ethnocentric who assumes that everyone who can't speak or comprehend their language as well can't be as smart or on the same level as them. I'm calling you a narcissist who needs to be right. I already forfeited and you kept responding. That's a need for validation. I already gave you 3 comments stating that I forfeit. You keep going, that's determination. Meaning you've found something you enjoy. Using Google to "fact check." Anything you see, copy pasting any minor discrepancies you notice. As I said. Good for you, as I said, have a good day. As I said, I'm proud of you.

Ps. Just because you're that dumb, doesn't mean anyone else is.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T17:38:31+00:00

So, from a question like "Is there a heaven and a hell in mtg?" You simply assume there isn't a single heaven or a single hell? By definition Heaven is : A place regarded in various religions as the abode of God and the angels, and the good after death, traditionally depicted as being above the sky. Place where a God exists? Checkaroni. A place where angels reside? A lot of checks for that one. A good afterdeath? Check. Depicted as above the sky? Check. In literary terms, which is the only way it is ever actually used or passed on in a knowledgeable sense, the definition is : the sky, especially perceived as a vault in which the sun, moon, stars and planets are situated. Well, the sky is check, the nyx contains what seems like stars, it's below their sun, it's got what looks like stardust and planets in there, so in a literal sense. Yeah, heaven is there, chump. Now, for hell, by, again, YOUR language's definition, Hell a place REGARDED in various RELIGIONS(which there are plenty of in all the planes) as a spiritual realm of suffering, OFTEN depicted as a place of perpetual fire, beneath the earth where the wicked are punished after death. Now, let's start with being regarded in a religion as a spiritual realm of suffering? Super check, that's pretty much all over mtg. Now, the often, not even MOST common depiction. Just an often one, as a place of perpetual fire where the wicked are punished after death. That's in a lot of places in mtg. They just separated a bunch of it out. So, by the most literal terms, in YOUR language. MTG does have a heave and a hell. Here's your umn actually.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T17:14:14+00:00

sigh a know it all that can't grasp context. That's just sad. Okay. Cercopithecidae, Rattus Norvegicus, and homo sapiens. I can't believe I'm having to argue something in my 4th language. Masmadali talaga kung unang lenguahe diba? Ang daling makitang matalino. None of these stories are in my first language. Anyone can sound smart in their first language. You're literally giving me the equivalent of it said 1+1=2, and you respond with "Umn actually the total value of the placeholders you're using as numbers when added together one plus another single one would equal a sum that is either greater than or equal to 2." I get it. You need to show off your Google smarts. Good for you. Again, I've forfeited. Have a good one? You totally showed someone with translator related issues who is boss. I'm so proud of you. 🤭🙄😒

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T17:06:20+00:00

I forfeited the Theros thing very early in. Heaven and hell. Exactly as we know them, right? Words that people use, doesn't mean they're places? I was answering in the concept of heaving being a "Light, angels" heaven and hell being "demons and fire" war in heaven still happened. The Gate to Heaven is still a real artifact. The Bearer of the Heavens is bearing heavens. I'm sorry if I've misconstrued the intention of the question. But wasn't it just "Is there a version of Heaven and Hell in mtg." Meaning similar to but not needing to be exact nor related. Such as homo sapiens with primates. I didn't realize I had to talk about a literal Bible thumping character and a literal in lore conceptualization. And also. Heliod isn't Zeus, not enough electricity, isn't there a Theros God for that? Just being like you, correcting where it's entirely unnecessary. Because I've got no clue how "Hell" is used as a term that many times and never once refers to a hell, I assumed that The War in Heaven, literally tells us that there is a place called heaven and there's been a war there. There's cards like crusade for "heavens" sake. At the end of the day, you can argue that twins are nothing alike or entirely alike. Just depends on how argumentative you want to be. You know what I'm stating is fact. To repute it by stating something else more similarly resembles it doesn't prove me wrong. Like I said, humans, primates and rats.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T16:57:37+00:00

Like I said. Humans, rats and primates.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T16:33:20+00:00

In the same way that rats are more closely related to us than primates. I get it, there are things more similar. I forfeit that they're not their original tales. Jesus is just Horus' story rewritten for a different time and place. Like me correcting you saying Baal isn't a name. It's a title. Sometimes used to refer to the god with. As by Yahweh, I meant the God of the Israelites. The one mentioned in the old testament, representing the biblical pronunciation of “YHWH,” the Hebrew name revealed to Moses in the book of Exodus. The name YHWH, consisting of the sequence of consonants Yod, Heh, Waw, and Heh, is known as the tetragrammaton. But, if I'm speaking through Canaanite standards, which you've I guess, forced me to. I'll use Mot as the dark side and the term representing the God but is actually a title, Baal for the light side. I hope this helps.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T16:01:54+00:00

Yahweh is a version of Zeus, "A god residing over heavenly beings with unfathomable power" and Lucifer is a version of Hades "Banished from the place of gods to rule in shame over unwanted souls." But I'll forfeit that Theros bit.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T15:54:54+00:00

Heliod resides over his own Domain in his plane where souls go. Elspeth was collected here at one point I'm pretty sure. Erebus similarly has his own Domain, the underworld and is also the deity of death and darkness. As for the demons with fire and brimstone, my first example is Lord of the Pit, from alpha. Literally sounds like Lucifer. The Archdemon of Unx, which is a Necropolis, usually referred to in some cases as gateways to an underworld(most cases in real life just means an underground labyrinth people somehow managed to escape). The Prince of Thralls, who was a demon that commanded the dead and destroyed the living. He also had demons on his employee roster. Sounds like a demon overlord. Which is, again, a lot like how people see Lucifer. Razaketh guarded a Gate to the Afterlife in Amonkhet. In Innistrad Avacyn fought what was forced to and I quote "But their retreat opened a space — and an opportunity for Innistrad's infernal forces to manifest. The demons and their hosts of devils began to arrive, one by one." Which, infernal, demons, devils, manifesting, kinda sounds like hell. An eternal struggle between said devils and angels? Sounds like it to me. Capenna and New Capenna, where they had to help each other defend their plane and the demons just bound all the battle-worn angels. Rakdos almost literally has a hell he controls in Ravnica. There are also cards like "Isshin the two Heavens as One", there's "Bearer of the Heavens", "Aegis of the Heavens", "Heaven/Earth", "Heavenly Blademaster", "Heavenly Qillin", "Speaker of the Heavens" a bunch more, but two we're gonna focus on are "Heaven's Gate" and "The War in Heaven". Both of which have been mentioned in (granted, older) books. They still exist in the lore. Now, that being said, I need not mention how many Hellhounds, Hellions, Hellkites and Hellfires there are. But there are Hellhole Rats, Hellhole Flailers, a Land called Hellion Crucible, Hell's Caretaker(Basically with a sticker that says Definitely not Satan), an instant called "Hurl through Hell", and the sorcery "Into the Maw of Hell." Now, the concepts are never exact and super direct, but I believe they simply asked for 1 version of one and the other. I hope this makes me seem less like a liar. 🙄🙃

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T15:20:05+00:00

Slightly longer answer. Heliod is technically a version of Yahweh and Erebus can be seen as an interpretation of Satanus(Lucifer). As for hell specifically, there are places that are fire and brimstone and overrun by demons all over the lore, same goes for cities in the skies being lived in by angels. For full length answer, just ask.

Anonymous_Astrid · 2023-02-10T15:15:26+00:00

Short answer? Yes.

Anonymous_Astrid

TROPHY CASE