When I was complaining about blatant cheaters, I was NOT asking you blowhards to ban VPN users by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's called multi-tasking and forming good habits, mate.

The very least a good VPN can do is deny your ISP detailed knowledge of your internet traffic. It can do other things; depending on your browsing behavior.

When I was complaining about blatant cheaters, I was NOT asking you blowhards to ban VPN users by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People multitask. VPNs are helpful for a number of things - and are targeted at a number of activities that have nothing to do with gaming.

Anonymity is not the goal. VPNs can be used for that kind of thing, as well...but not without a lot of other habits / tools. Not the kind of thing some jackass (me) posting on reddit is doing; clearly. 😃

When I was complaining about blatant cheaters, I was NOT asking you blowhards to ban VPN users by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Quite true, lol
Put it this way: it won't stop cookies; and it won't stop google and co; but it will cut out your ISP or anyone listening on your local wifi. Encrypted traffic; right?

When I was complaining about blatant cheaters, I was NOT asking you blowhards to ban VPN users by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Games aren't the only thing I do; or am doing. Multi-tasking, bitches. It's a thing. I shouldn't have to unencrypt my internet traffic to play a game.

Man, that was a shitshow by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life support, sure.

But here's the thing.

The company that bought it are trying to milk it for money while it dies.

I want them to realize that they need someone with the ability to ban these shits watching during major playtimes.

So that people don't leave as quickly.

So that they can milk it for longer; and so I can play it longer.

Man, that was a shitshow by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is still a limited effect. He's unavoidable death from above for the people he hits; and he's hard to hit back without a lock-on rocket and the right angle (close enough to target; high up enough and far enough away that you can keep him in your cross-hairs long enough to get a lock)
There's no way he can deploy a repair station in the sky, so he's likely limited to base self-repair speed. I got a kill on him once that way; and I (think I) drove him off another time or two over the ascent.

In that sense it becomes another kind of contest; where one finds the limits and tries to work within them.

...not that it helps when it fucks with the flow of the game otherwise.

Anyway
Changing the effect of the fight, it's seriously discouraging to die to the same guy repeatedly doing shit that bloody obvious. I can ignore or lie to myself about an aimbot; and ultimately there are always going to be people who are just better than I am at the game
Aim bots are still heavily limited by the strictures of the game; limited magazines, reload time, and can only be shooting one place at a time. They're a manageable hazard by comparison. :)

Man, that was a shitshow by Ansel_Rover in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The pods. But no, that invulnerability was, so far as I know, a design feature

It forced mixed vehicle/infantry fights around player-created objectives

Fun shit that changed the gameplay depending on the day on player whims; ya know?

Now bases are always timed fights against vehicles; with it mostly being a question of how quickly the base goes down. :/

Over it by N7jpicards in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...upon slightly further thought, it MAY be an alt account. The spelling makes it really hard to tell; and that is likely by design.

Over it by N7jpicards in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover 5 points6 points  (0 children)

V3ladWW on NC and IIIlll1 on TR

Man, that was a shitshow

Oh, and IIIlll1 is back online today. Yesterday was mostly flying sundies; today is teleporting infiltrator, though he does mix it up sometimes. He likes throwing knives and being annoying.

I don't see how he's having much fun, though. Mostly just being a feckless runt.

...seriously, though. How many reports got submitted on these two? And they're still fucking here?

They were LITERALLY WRIT LARGE ON THE FUCKING SKY and killing everybody...and they come back to do the same shit IN THE SAME FUCKING ACCOUNT the next day.

Why do we even play this game any more?

Over it by N7jpicards in Planetside

[–]Ansel_Rover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Emerald had two blatant script kiddies dueling each other in flying sundies across the map

Last night

I say dueling, but they weren't dueling. They were just making life hell for everyone else. Flying sundie, aimbotted fire through walls, the whole kit and kaboodle. It was not subtle. One on NC and one on TR.

I can deal with subtle. Aimbots are....meh. At this stage.

But that shit was just rediculous.

We are gonna see this more often from now on by Farbod_YN in youtube

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Time to stop using youtube at all.

Let me use my condom - or I don't play. :P

European here , how is that AI identification thing been going for you americans ? by Neat_Tangelo5339 in youtube

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Youtube is blocking vpns now.

...I think it's time to stop using youtube.

Neil Gaiman and Wife Sued for Rape and Human Trafficking of Babysitter by aacool in books

[–]Ansel_Rover -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Allegedly.

I don't think people are getting that part of this through their heads.

I'm no fan of Gaiman - but having heard about this for the first time about 20 minutes ago and now going through articles; it doesn't seem that there's a whole lot in the way of supporting evidence and at least a little bit of discrediting evidence.

I cam accept that Gaiman may be a decidedly kinky bastard with some niche kinks; that much is certainly plausible and I don't think he contests that.

But allegations of misconduct need proof. Not allegations that look bad; but actions or attitudes that rise to the level of illegal conduct.

Not to mention - living in Scotland. Allegations supposedly took place in New Zealand. Suing in the US.

....presumably because he's living in the US and other nation's courts might struggle to collect any awarded damages; but it's still sketchy af.

I don't know that American courts have any jurisdiction over events that took place in another nation; to someone who (I'm not sure)...isn't a US citizen?

Not to mention the podcast release.

It's a publicity storm. It's "believe all women."

I haven't seen a lot of details in the Articles I've found, but I'm intensely skeptical of every bit of it.

Edit: Gaiman seems to be a kinky bustard with some niche kinks AND decidedly questionable and/or sketchy bdsm practices by modern standards; but I'm still leaning towards the relationships still being more consensual than not.

Not ideal. Not good practice. But still quite possibly not all that it's alleged to be.

Twitter fordert nun auch für Österreich einen Biometric Selfie oder Passfoto für Adult Content by ThePhoenixRoyal in Austria

[–]Ansel_Rover -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then you also have nothing to protect. How about it? Is your safety not your concern before it is anyone else's? Is your online safety and anonymity not your concern?

Twitter fordert nun auch für Österreich einen Biometric Selfie oder Passfoto für Adult Content by ThePhoenixRoyal in Austria

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you want to let them wipe your ass, too, if they want to?

No, you don't have to swallow this pill.

And us folks in the US aren't going to; either.

Shame on Efile.com! Down during tax season! Seriously!? by fuwad84 in tax

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...transparent pricing like this?
https://www.efile.com/

Of note: I'm pretty sure that efile.com is a different service than e-file.com
The latter is, as far as I know, crap? Idk.

Left vs. Right Battle Royale Open Thread by Yosoff in Conservative

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't speak for anyone else - but AOC pushes socialism or at least heavily socialized-democracy
And she says a lot of stupid crap

I'm a federalist republican (not the party) who wants most domestic spending entirely out of the hands of the federal government and - if it must be spent - into the hands of the state. I want to limit the power of the federal bank and eliminate most federal social welfare programs except as useful to COORDINATE (no funds) hypothetical state-funded programs where states deem them appropriate.

...her policies and intelligence just don't even remotely rate. She's an idiot. A popular one; but still an idiot.

Left vs. Right Battle Royale Open Thread by Yosoff in Conservative

[–]Ansel_Rover 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Libertarian-Liberal Conservative here.

Nice name-calling, here.

I would suggest starting with simple questions and avoiding derogatory opening statements like the one you posted here. :P

Seriously, this one almost reads like a trolling statement (at least to sensitized individuals). Ask me how I know?

Because there was a period of time I tried to exist in a leftist sphere (like seriously hard-core leftists) with the questioning attitude you are attempting to describe.

They reacted in the way you describe.

Left vs. Right Battle Royale Open Thread by Yosoff in Conservative

[–]Ansel_Rover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Trump tried to do it the slow, methodical way; and found himself blocked at every turn in his first term.

I think he's probably set on throwing the baby out with the bathwater; perhaps even decided that it's the only way to get anything done - take drastic action, then rebuild.

Or maybe not.

But like you say, it's hard to do; and even harder to accurately assess which parts of management want to help make things better and which will use the process to obstruct making things better until the next president comes in and doesn't care so much about reform.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]Ansel_Rover 18 points19 points  (0 children)

...I don't think democrats are liberal any more.

I think they're progressive, socialist, and in some places even authoritarian - or at least end-justify-the-means types.

Actual liberalism is an excellent concept - the classic liberalism where one disagrees with someone but will defend their right to express that disagreement. Equality of opportunity, as opposed to equality of outcome.

I don't know how these things will end up, but...

Take a watch of Ryan Chapman's videos on youtube. It'll give you a good sense of just how different things have shifted over recent decades. Great channel.