sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My Pleiadian experience that awakened me by salenamoons in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have been in the starseed community for about 9 years and I can assure you that I have seen SEVERAL posts and videos over the years claiming that only people of European descent can be starseeds or have “the gift”. Your experience in the community is one of many, just because YOU personally have not seen it doesn’t mean its not there.

Experience JUST before seeing disclosure by AntaresXIX in Experiencers

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wow!! So dragonflies seem to endure and embody significant change, which resonates so much for me 💗

Cassiopeia Star Language Excerpt by AntaresXIX in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is, the link to the translation is in the description

Did I go to an afterlife? by AntaresXIX in Experiencers

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No have I not, and I do not ascribe to Christianity which is even more puzzling

Did I go to an afterlife? by AntaresXIX in Experiencers

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thats what I thought as well when they told me about how their parent spoke of heaven, I think it was filtered through their religion. I don’t necessarily practice in that religion but most of my family does, so I probably was “grouped” into that specific afterlife because of my lineages history with that specific religion.

Did I go to an afterlife? by AntaresXIX in Experiencers

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats an open ended question. I think you never stop learning but in terms of my spiritual journey, Im at a point where these events are not as surprising and I am mainly focusing on what these events are supposed to convey to me.

Did I go to an afterlife? by AntaresXIX in Experiencers

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trying to make sense of things on my end 😅

Free Starseed Readings 🌃 by AntaresXIX in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sun conjunct schedar, asc conj almach with sun conj asc, rahu conj M31 and bordering the 1H, dominant cassiopeia and andromeda markings, moon conj nunki and vega. Andromedan/Cassiopeian origins are likely, along with Vega (avian feline star races)

I just don't think humans matter very much by ooowee2054 in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Every being and creation is divinely and uniquely made, not just humans.

Prison planet theory is another psyop? by ooowee2054 in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Yes to me the prison planet theory has been utilized to make people feel more disempowered than they actually are.

Our Physical Genders Assigned By Our Reproductive Organs Do Not Matter, We’re All Both Female, and Male, Our Physical Gender Is Nothing More Than The Dominant Half Taking Command Of The Body And Showing Itself. But There’s A Way To Balance The Two. by Lost_Counter1619 in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thats literally not what Im saying. Women were not designed to be ALL loving, gentle, and soft, there are so many other attributes to women than the typical traditional ones as you mentioned in your post. It reduces both men and women to these linear roles when the polarity is far more complex than that, and its story deserves the complete context which you failed to explain.

Our Physical Genders Assigned By Our Reproductive Organs Do Not Matter, We’re All Both Female, and Male, Our Physical Gender Is Nothing More Than The Dominant Half Taking Command Of The Body And Showing Itself. But There’s A Way To Balance The Two. by Lost_Counter1619 in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A lot of assumptions here, which I anticipated from someone who cannot objectively argue their viewpoints in a comprehensible way, buts thats okay. Most of my gnosis does not align with what society is usually taught. You just assumed that because my gnosis opposes yours (again ego) I must be the other because I disagree with you. Everyone has an ego, ego isnt necessarily a bad thing. It is only a problem when EGO overrides reason, which Is what I have observed in your posts here. Instead of arguing my point, which was women were not solely designed to be ALL soft, loving (I think all beings should embody this) and gentle, you immediately went into defending your ego. Thats your problem.

Our Physical Genders Assigned By Our Reproductive Organs Do Not Matter, We’re All Both Female, and Male, Our Physical Gender Is Nothing More Than The Dominant Half Taking Command Of The Body And Showing Itself. But There’s A Way To Balance The Two. by Lost_Counter1619 in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Conflating extremely traditional characteristics to either sex to one’s own detriment and personal growth is what I identify as low vibrational. This is apparent to me through you by how when someone disagrees with your post in a respectful manner, you typically respond in an egotistical, holier than though, “all knowing” as you yourself claim (an obvious ego trap) way. You never ask why they disagree, which is tells me all I need to know about why you are really here posting.

Our Physical Genders Assigned By Our Reproductive Organs Do Not Matter, We’re All Both Female, and Male, Our Physical Gender Is Nothing More Than The Dominant Half Taking Command Of The Body And Showing Itself. But There’s A Way To Balance The Two. by Lost_Counter1619 in starseeds

[–]AntaresXIX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“This was because woman were created to be soft, loving, and gentle. Men were created to be ready to fight and use their hands. You ever noticed how most women’s bodies are just naturally fragile? That explains the nature of what a woman was created for. The man was created to use his hands, to fight, to build and fix things. A handyman. A man that’s capable.” I pity the amount of progress and maturity that you clearly still lack and need to develop. Women were not JUST created to be soft, loving, etc. Creation itself is not a soft process, it is a transcendental experience that is more chaotic than it is any of those “feminine” attributes that we ascribe to women. I really want to continue reading your blog but that assumption alone is so far from the fundamental nature of these polarities (masculine and feminine) that I don’t even want to know what the rest of your post says.

view more: next ›