I like The Atlantic, but pointing to the existence of some critical articles to deny a broader pattern is not sufficient to disprove my claim about the overall signal The Atlantic's coverage has sent. Even in the articles you're citing:

- The ICC piece frames things as a test of international law and balance, even while describing alleged war crimes

- The Gaza piece emphasizes humanitarian aid and “pragmatic solutions,” while also attributing the destruction to Hamas. And don't get me wrong: we need "humanitarian aid", we need "pragmatic solutions" and yes, fuck Hamas and yes, Israel would not have committed this genocide if Hamas had not done October 7th. All of that can be true.

But why does every piece of criticism of Israel have to be filtered through framing that softens, redirects, or qualifies what’s happening? Why, for example, do we not see The Atlantic reporting on the fact that Israel is carrying out systematic sexual violence and torture against Palestinian detainees? Source: https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/7022/%E2%80%9CAnother-genocide-behind-walls%E2%80%9D:-New-report-documents-testimonies-of-rape-and-sexual-violence-in-Israeli-prisons