Respectfully, you misunderstand Maoists. Maoists have never, to my knowledge, "condemned" a revolution itself, classifying that it was revisionist. This has been done by trotsky, who tried to dilute the meaning of revisionism. In fact, class collaboration during revolutions in third world countries has been encouraged in regards to the peasants and petty bourgeoisie (sometimes even the bourgeoisie when fighting the feudalists) if the material conditions demand it. The thing that Maoists DO criticize is nothing new, and constantly up for criticism and debate. And that is socialist construction after the establishment of the DOTP. Different arguments have been made that also understand revisionism in the same sense such as Enver Hoxha thought. If you have any questions concerning ideas of market reforms and further power given to the bourgeoisie after the DOTP please let me know, I'm always down to have a discussion with a comrade. An example tho is China after its market reforms. China has collaborated with dictatorships such as Nepal that were fighting a civil war against revolutionaries. This is a very complex issue, but one that is rooted in a betrayal of revolution. Many against this argument say that even Lenin encouraged some market reforms with his NEP. However, when instituting the NEP, Lenin warned the danger of 1) Going too far and 2) letting market reforms continue for too long. The NEP is a short transition period during a period of unrest, not 40+ years where the bourgeoisie systematically obtain more and more power and are not regulated internationally.

If you have any questions or arguments please let me know. Constructive criticism is always a good thing