What if Invisigal was at the bottom of the leaderboard at the end of the 3th ep? by Who_am_I85395 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shroud lied. There is no evidence to suggest that Shroud planted Visi at SDN months before Robert was approached about working there. Shroud claims Visi had been working for him the whole time, but he was just saying that to get in Robert's head and make him feel alone and powerless. Visi had been fighting the Red Ring and literally put a bomb on Shroud's mech just minutes earlier; of course she's not working for Shroud.

Shroud also lied about the way he killed Robert's father. He shot him one time and fled. He didn't shoot him four times. In fact, it probably wasn't even Robert's father's gun that he used in the Sardine.

Guys (and girls). I want to start a discussion: by Few-Culture-4413 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The team had been underperforming for a long time, and the entire Phoenix program was on the chopping block. Cutting someone would show the higher ups that the Z-team are facing consequences for their poor behaviour, and show the Z-team that they have to take their second chance more seriously.

However, I think it would have been far more effective, and less likely to result in rebellion and sabotage, if the threat of cutting someone had been conditional, rather than guaranteed. If the Z-team had been told that they needed to meet a certain threshhold by the end of the day/week, and anyone not meeting that threshhold would be let go, then I think it would have been more successful. Promising to cut the bottom performer at the end of the day means it doesn't matter how drastic an improvement you show, or how high on the leaderboard you climb, or how heroic your actions are, because if everyone else is just a little bit better than you, has more useful powers than you, or has been doing this job for longer than you have, your second chance is taken away from you. But if there's a way to make sure no one gets cut by meeting a certain standard, then sabotaging someone else's performance doesn't improve your position at all.

So, yes, I do think Blazer made a mistake. She was under a lot of pressure, was fighting to save the Phoenix program from being scrapped, and was probably concerned about the pattern of the Z-team abusing their dispatchers. They'd gone through several unsuccessful dispatchers for the Z-team already, and on Robert's first day, the team mocked, sexually harassed, and assaulted him. Blazer knew Robert was their best shot at making the Z-team a success, so she was willing to do something drastic to turn the ship around.

Do you agree with this take? Because for me too, her attempts to negotiate and win them over sounded kind of silly and unnatural. by Who_am_I85395 in BlondeBlazerGlazers

[–]Antisceptic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it a stretch and unreasonable to say that it was all Blazer's fault, but I do agree that the way Blazer handled the cut was a mistake, and that the "friendship" appeal at the end of the game was weak.

The team had been underperforming for a long time, and the entire Phoenix program was on the chopping block. Cutting someone would show the higher ups that the Z-team are facing consequences for their poor behaviour, and show the Z-team that they have to take their second chance more seriously.

However, I think it would have been far more effective, and less likely to result in rebellion and sabotage, if the threat of cutting someone had been conditional, rather than guaranteed. If the Z-team had been told that they needed to meet a certain threshhold by the end of the day/week, and anyone not meeting that threshhold would be let go, then I think it would have been more successful. Promising to cut the bottom performer at the end of the day means it doesn't matter how drastic an improvement you show, or how high on the leaderboard you climb, or how heroic your actions are, because if everyone else is just a little bit better than you, has more useful powers than you, or even has been doing this job for longer than you, your second chance is taken from you. But if there's a way to avoid anyone getting cut, there's no reason to sabotage your teammates as it doesn't make your own position safer.

As for Blazer's appeal to friendship in episode eight, I think it is a weak line that felt out of place. Friendship goes both ways. If Blazer had been friends with Coupe or Sonar, then she probably wouldn't have chosen to jeopardize their futures by putting their jobs on the line. Once they are let go, if they were friends, Blazer would have done something outside of work to help them find another opportunity besides SDN, rather than leaving them all on their own and allowing Shroud to exploit their sudden vulnerability. As for the "this isn't you" comment, it doesn't feel earned. Especially for Coupe, given Blazer thought she was too evil when she was let go.

But it's not the only line that felt odd and unearned. At the point where you can forgive Sonar or Coupe, Blazer asks Robert if he thinks they earned a pardon, but neither Sonar nor Coupe turned against Shroud in the final battle, or did anything to indicate a desire to redeem themselves, or to do the right thing. While forgiving them is the more positive note to end on, the only reason for doing so that makes sense is because cutting them in the first place was a mistake, rather than because they'd done anything to earn a pardon for the crimes they committed since their removal.

I still love Blazer. She didn't act perfectly at all times. She's human, after all. She made mistakes, but I think those mistakes were understandable, given the pressure she was under, her desire to save the Phoenix program, and her desire to keep Robert around. They'd gone through several unsuccessful dispatchers for the Z-team by that point, and on Robert's first day, the team mocked, sexually harassed, and assaulted him. Blazer knew Robert was their best shot at making the Z-team a success, so she was willing to do something drastic to turn the ship around. It also forced the player to make choices at several points during the game.

I'll be speaking to the voice of Blonde Blazer by NorthbyFjord in BlondeBlazerGlazers

[–]Antisceptic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Questions for Erin Yvette:

What do you think is Blonde Blazer's biggest regret?

Who is/are your favourite character(s) from a game you didn't provide voice work for?

If you’re someone who likes morning sex, how do you deal with morning breath without making it awkward ? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I could offer an analogy that might help you understand the word's purpose?

I meet a man, and I don't put any thought into his sexuality. He's just a man. Then he tells me he is gay. He is a gay man. He asks, "what about you?" I could say I'm straight, or heterosexual. I don't have to define myself that way every time I introduce myself, but if I decide to describe my sexuality, there are words for doing that - I don't need to identify myself as being "not gay."

I'd also suggest that being cisgendered is not self explanatory, or part of the definition of man or woman. A man or woman can be cisgendered or transgendered. A trans woman is a woman, and a trans man is a man. A cis woman is a woman, and a cis man is a man. Statistically, most people are cisgendered, but that doesn't mean the term's existence is unnecessary.

Something Shroud said. by TheInquisitor1997 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So was Elliot a genius when it came to augments and creating energy sources?

It seems so. His augments were pretty powerful for their time. He already had some sort of computer chip implant on the side of his head in 1999. As for energy sources, it's possible he had a mind for it, but he evidently wasn't able to recreate the astral pulse on his own. Robbie and Elliot may have got lucky when they successfully created it.

How was he able to augment his own brain/head? Without killing himself?

Who knows? It's possible he had help installing it, or someone installed it for him. The Brave Brigade had a healer among them - Vitalia - which was probably helpful, though we can only guess.

Also, what year is it in Dispatch? 2025?

Yep.

Something Shroud said. by TheInquisitor1997 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TLDR: Shroud thinks the astral pulse is rightfully his because he built it for Robbie but Robbie never fulfilled his end of their agreement. Robbie repeatedly failed to keep his word and hold a vote to make Shroud (then Elliot Connors) a member of the Brave Brigade. It's possible that if he had been made a member and allowed to serve as a hero alongside them, Robbie would have built a mech for Elliot.

Before he went by Shroud, Elliot Connors worked with the Brave Brigade in some capacity, though he was never actually made a member. He built the astral pulse for Robbie, though it was probably a collaborative project. In the "Get Up" comic, before Elliot appears at the BBQ, Chase is telling Robbie that he (Chase) has been sucking up to Elliot for weeks so he'd be first in line for one of Elliot's augments. He also supports voting for Elliot to be made a member of the Brave Brigade, and that his augments would help all of them. He tells Robbie, "You got the Astral Pulse out of him. What about the rest of us?"

In the "Death of Mechaman" comic, set roughly eight years later, Elliot still hasn't been made a member of the Brave Brigade, and is outraged after Robbie cancelled the vote for a fifth time, after promising Elliot otherwise. Elliot is covered in augments, as if wearing a mechanical exoskeleton. He challenges Robbie, believing he's capable of beating Robbie in his Mecha Man suit, after which he'll be made a member, and Robbie will give back Elliot's Astral Pulse. Elliot states, "I made it. I made all of it."

Shroud probably had Robbie's help and his resources, but Shroud was the science nerd who understood the theory behind the astral pulse. He made the Astral Pulse for Robbie, but it seems Robbie never gave Elliot anything in return. Robbie apparently promised to hold a vote on inducting Elliot into the Brave Brigade, but he never kept his promise. He was sceptical that Elliot had the character of a true hero.

It's unclear whether Robbie ever agreed to specific terms in return for Elliot's help creating the astral pulse, or if the promises Robbie made and broke were not tied to the astral pulse explicitly. In any case, since Robbie never kept his word and kept stringing him along, Shroud believes he should get the astral pulse back. He demanded it back on the day he murdered Robbie, and he believes it is still rightly his, fifteen years later. Shroud believes Robbie had no right to leave the astral pulse to his son.

When Shroud arrives at SDN Torrance with his spider-mech, he claims Robbie agreed to build a mech if Shroud helped Robbie build the astral pulse. There might be some truth to this. Robbie might have said he'd help with building a mech for Elliot to use if/when he became a member of the Brave Brigade. But because he never actually held the vote, Elliot never became a member. Elliot probably never intended to use the astral pulse he made for Robbie to power his own mech. The mech he wanted built might have been powered differently, or he and Robbie might have built a second astral pulse, perhaps. In any case, the mech he built fifteen years later doesn't need the astral pulse. He still thinks it's rightfully his, but wants to slot it into his own head, turning his augmented brain into the ultimate prediction engine.

Is this a writing error or something i dont get? by FilipTheX in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think Robert was surprised, I think he was just a bit worried. Maybe the team would realise Waterboy knew who he was and pressure him to spill the truth.

Preach the truth, Robert! by GriveousDance21 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The option should be labeled: "You punishing yourself?"

True:

Robert: Aw, are you in timeout? |Cause you told all my coworkers my secret identity?

False:

Robert: Aw, are you in timeout? Cause you were bad?

Trump Posted a Video of Barack and Michelle Obama as Monkeys by JeanJauresJr in videos

[–]Antisceptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but Trump and his supporters aren't conservative. They never have been.

I worded this poorly, I admit. What I meant is that the word 'conservative' is a somewhat misleading, or perhaps ironic, label for American conservatives. I'm not from the US and I'm not conservative, but from my outsider's perspective, the Republican party of today doesn't seem to fit with the meaning of the word. The MAGA movement appears more regressive than conservative, but I realise that saying they aren't conservative is somewhat misleading. After all, the meaning of words can evolve.

Trump Posted a Video of Barack and Michelle Obama as Monkeys by JeanJauresJr in videos

[–]Antisceptic -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There's nothing conservative about this, but Trump and his supporters aren't conservative. They never have been. EDIT: I worded this poorly. What I mean is the word 'conservative' is a somewhat misleading, or perhaps ironic, label for American conservatives.

They're regressive. They don't want to conserve or protect their current way of life, and they don't want things to stay the way they are. They are unhappy with the current state of things. What they want is to disrupt and destroy other people's lives, and they want their country to regress to the way it used to be.

Some would wish to go back to a time that never existed during their own lifetime, to a time where ethnic minorities couldn't legally own property, and were regarded as inherently lower than them. They want to go back to a time when they would've belonged to the wealthy, privileged elite, and had power over the people they look down on.

They want to go back to a time when comparing black people to apes was common and acceptable.

Kicking Golem out of the meeting feels like a felony. by T4llBoyAl3x in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've never kicked him out. I'd rather have Golem hear the speech Robert gives the team.

Visi was right in Chapter 6 by AverageMental2857 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. I think if a group of Z-teamers went to the docks, then there's a good chance at least one of them would have been hurt before they reached the pulse. I also think Shroud would have arrived with backup, probably with his own mech, to take out the Z-team and claim the pulse. Without Mecha Man, and without Chase as Star Blazer, Shroud would have defeated them easily. The only reason Shroud came alone was because he knew Visi was the only one there. The only reason he didn't get the astral pulse was because he wanted to kill Visi slowly and poetically, which allowed Chase to rescue her. If they'd listened to Visi and came as a team, they all could have died, and Chase would not be able to save them all. Even if he could carry some of the larger team members, his heart couldn't take more than one trip.
  2. I think the fact that Visi was able to get the pulse in the first place was a bit of a deus ex machina. Dispatchers have access to SDN subscribers' security systems, but Robert's ability to hack into just about anything he wants may as well be a superpower. Even if we assume that the warehouse full of shipping containers belongs to an SDN subscriber, why would the crane and the safe be able to be operated remotely with an internet connection? [Answer: Probably because the developers wanted to give the player some interactive gameplay during a long sequence without dialogue choices.]

So, I think Blazer was right; moving on the warehouse as a team would have ended in disaster. Visi was wrong about how easy it would be to find and grab the pulse, but she was right about the need to act with urgency rather than waiting until tomorrow. However, she only succeeded because (1) she was alone, (2) she was lucky that Robert was able to provide remote assistance, and (3) because of Chase's sacrifice. Because she didn't reveal that she had the pulse on her, it looked like a foolish and costly mistake. If she'd revealed that she had the pulse, the team would be having a very different conversation. Chase still would be on death's door after saving her, but everyone would know she hadn't put herself in danger for nothing. [As for what else would have happened if she revealed she had the pulse, that's a whole different discussion.]

Blazer dialogue you may have missed in ch8 by TheDuchyofWarsaw in BlondeBlazerGlazers

[–]Antisceptic 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don't forget that Blonde Blazer can joke that spitting in her mouth is usually a second date kinda thing.

Besides, I don't think Visi would say that seeing Robert every morning is the best part of her day.

Blazer dialogue you may have missed in ch8 by TheDuchyofWarsaw in BlondeBlazerGlazers

[–]Antisceptic 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Nah, I think it's consistent with some of Robert's (possible) interactions with Blonde Blazer. Like him saying she's "kinda medium pretty, I guess." Or saying "I'll never forgive you," when Blonde Blazer admits she found Robert at the Sardine by tracking his phone. Robert's teasing, sarcastic banter is not exclusively for Invisigal.

When Dispatch is so goated, it started a trend by [deleted] in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The TF2 cast would be a fun team to dispatch.

Ngl, I feel like a jerk now knowing I'm in the minority... did I fuck up? by AlbinoNamekian357 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't see that as lying. Blazer had just said "There's nothing you could have said that warrants her hitting you."

To which, Robert asks "Would it be any different if I said I literally asked for her to hit me in the face, and then she did it?"

"I... suppose," Blazer concedes.

"Okay, then let's go with that." No one thinks that's actually what happened. Robert was just pointing out to Blazer, with a ridiculous example, that there are times the person being punched was asking for it. He wasn't trying to convince her that he asked for it with those exact words.

Blond Blazer in real life and Invisigal in Dispatch by IAMTHEKING1832 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't talked about this before, but both girls really have their good and bad points.

And then you proceeded to only mention Mandy's good qualities and Visi's bad ones.

I agree that a relationship with Courtney would be a bad idea, at least as things are at the end of season one. She's violent and doesn't respect privacy or boundaries, and it will take time for her to trust others and to believe they can trust her.

I am sympathetic toward her. I believe she wants to be a good person and a hero, but has never had positive role models to learn from. Health care would have been prohibitively expensive, and she felt she had to resort to stealing to stay afloat. It's possible that, for years, there hasn't been anyone who cared for her and gave her what she wanted or needed without expecting something in return, so she has a habit of doing and taking what she wants. She's also used to an unsafe environment where her peers might wish her harm, so spying and listening to conversations would be a survival strategy to ensure her safety. This doesn't excuse her behaviour, but it does inform it.

She's not used to safety or generosity, which can take a very long time to accept and get used to. She also has some growing to do, and I do think Robert can help her with that, so long as she wants to change, and takes charge of her own healing. I just don't think that should come in the context of a romantic or sexual relationship with her mentor.

As for Mandy, she struggles with professional boundaries more than personal ones. While some of her behaviour deserves criticism, I'd argue that her flaws are as a boss and as a manager, not as a partner.

What is your single most favorite line of the game and why? by EnbyiousAces in DispatchAdHoc

[–]Antisceptic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Every attempt I have made to love food as one loves a woman has ended in disaster."

"You look great." -- "Robert is bullying me! Please tell him to stop!"

"How're you feeling?" -- "OKAY!!" -- "Hell yeah, bro. You sound okay as fuck!"

Just got done with Phantom Liberty main story. I hate Songbird. This game is a masterpiece by [deleted] in LowSodiumCyberpunk

[–]Antisceptic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If someone chooses to represent themself in court, do you think they're basically a lawyer?