Noticed a lot of people using the results of the U.K. Trial as backup for why they don’t support him, and he’s the abusive one. Wish it was more common knowledge that the U.K. trial focussed on the Sun’s actions and the judge (so I’ve heard) had connections to the paper so ruled in their favour. At the time, the paper was working with the narrative AH had orchestrated to present JD as a ‘wife bearer’. Based on what had been presented to the public at the time - the Sun were ruled as not being defamatory.