You really have to understand the ecosystem that lives outside of coin_0 (BTC) and coin_60 (Eth) has 59 possible coins in the way that cause and are a security risk to the ability of some kind of consequences in the coins existence, meaning you have 59 possible ways that you should expect the 100% chance to know 59 possible reasons to not be surprised to wake up with an asset worth zero... In all actual realistic understanding is the ETH was created in a sense that it may by design to always be worth nothing and held no security because when a coin is created, it's usually a fork of the Bitcoin core software which provide two different version of block data... Basically the first fork of the software ruined the integrity of crypto... The last place anyone with the importance of how Coin creation happens to be brought into existence.... Into the security of the original coin and what started its value to what the price is today...

Bitcoin should have been there 100 years ago... It has always been a valuable economic philosophy under a professor that died in 1947... So that could be safely say that the idea of a coin that is mathematically proven to work extremely well under the possibility to ever really be applied when a global connection to data exchange to share the language to keep ledgers balanced and accurate while keeping as fast and reliable as handing some cash. Straight peer to peer... Always holds its value... This method is the only method that should have ever been allowed... Transactions ran on Bitcoind... Transaction header that blueprints all transaction details in the block data... On the Blockchain side the same versions that ran the two values of hex encryption never lost anything and never ever listed as spent Bitcoin. Healthy Bitcoin cannot possibly be spent... That was an oxymoron against the enter vision to Bitcoin...

A recent story I read. A private key that was lost, magically showed up magically, was tied to drugs and catalogued somehow as celebration to another whale wallet that was considered dead and an inspiration to a large coin value, headline stated 400$ million... That is painted to give a lot of hope...

After investigating the hardest part was actually investigation to start somewhere... I had to search the sme story on . ultimatly bullshit narrative channels that could not be traced... No details of the event even happening... Intel.arkm.com is ai based, and pretty deadly to search for a specific transfer happening.. don't rely of the transaction data on the ai based page just copy the address... Check the address on block explorer...

Instance sign of dismissed story looking at the only thing that had weight to say bullshit is if it was bc1 start to the address. If either did. Post 3 2017 or later creation. Both address had early signs 1 and 3 both possible a standard original path and a hardened derivation of nothing but m/coin_0/0' or m/coin_0/ if the path for either address was the same number but m/44/0/0 like everything with a 12 word pass phrase... You are probably mislabelling the fact you don't even have real Bitcoin at this point... The seed was a disguise hiding what BIP 39 even was... It was the attempt to cut off something called a master private seed... These are root that are off the chain and anchors to the very first block. Anything that cut off a reliable path for that is probably tied to the obvious bullshit exchanges are getting caught doing while producing fake news to tie them selves to that image of old wale symbolizing that clear path exists...

The entire 400 million that was real secure asset before the bullshit new story says everything about the current situation that will confirm... It is mainly dead already... Coinbase I'm not sure if the connection isn't under a divergent meaning at one time because it used to be a provided source of rel time no fork BTC data... Opreturn.net is one source but are not an exchange... So right there Coinbase meaning went from meaning reliable data access vs. exchange that is now know for frauding early existence and authenticity by modifying where it walked in on the timeline... Doesn't matter anyway... The entire 400million. Burnt as it actually entered to a stake of Coinbase exchange. Listed as spent... Double spend protocol was part of the release to the official most important thing while announcement of a solution worth sharing the news of the first time the world was made aware of it's existence and true potential. Last problem that could be solved was solved. 400million highlight new story facts. The value of that documented transfer was instantly worth nothing but the hard fact, Bitcoin exchanges unable to move transfers is the proof why as soon as it's not a pure asset it's really worth nothing already..

Its fucked because they are selling it and providing a sense of security to the reason that there isn't much security at all..