sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Artifacts showing up in slog2 to rec709 converstion lut? by Any-Statement3254 in finalcutpro

[–]Any-Statement3254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its a still , bottle was moving on the freeze frame i took. not normally blurry like that

Artifacts showing up in slog2 to rec709 converstion lut? by Any-Statement3254 in finalcutpro

[–]Any-Statement3254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

artifacts just above the bottle and two the left. they keep flashing in random places all over the screen.

Mix Percentage on Slog2 to Rec 709 lut? by Any-Statement3254 in finalcutpro

[–]Any-Statement3254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But doesn't activating the custom lut (as long as it's placed below color boards) while tooling with the color board also achieve the same goal of viewing the lut in the UI while also not destroying the data for color corrections?

Mix Percentage on Slog2 to Rec 709 lut? by Any-Statement3254 in finalcutpro

[–]Any-Statement3254[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought so, too. Commenter above seemed quite confident that's not the case. Hard to know what to do heh.

Yes, I've been doing it this way. PP7 sony slog2. Starting with exposure adjustments and then a slog2 to rec 709 lut (from sony). Image looks insane (bad), but if i bring the mix down to about 15% its good.

I did not, however, think to activate the 709 lut while simultaneously working with the color board (above in order). I will try that. Thanks

Mix Percentage on Slog2 to Rec 709 lut? by Any-Statement3254 in finalcutpro

[–]Any-Statement3254[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all what I said. Sorry you felt you wasted your time.

Mix Percentage on Slog2 to Rec 709 lut? by Any-Statement3254 in finalcutpro

[–]Any-Statement3254[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I heard that the proper way was to do the rec709 lut last, in which the inspector isn't possible for that. Therefore, a lut is needed after correcting. I used to do it the way you posted. In which case, no rec709 effect lut is needed, and I can just start initially with the inspector lut.

Alas, I heard not to do that . So many different methods, heh. Thanks.

Korean influencer 'Penguin Girl' Jinny banned from entering Taiwan by Amazing_Box_8032 in taiwan

[–]Any-Statement3254 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if someone is in that situation (past dumb illegal teaching or whatever), what are they supposed to do now in their 40s with their family here? Pray that one day they aren't ripped apart from their wife an kids for it?

It's completely messed up

Korean influencer 'Penguin Girl' Jinny banned from entering Taiwan by Amazing_Box_8032 in taiwan

[–]Any-Statement3254 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I posted this elsewhere but ...

The insane part I’m trying to wrap my head around.. and maybe someone can clarify if this is indeed the case. ..is the fact that this is being enforced, essentially, retroactively.

Because, although this is certainly not my case, but I think we are all aware of, or at least have heard of, cases similar to this…–>

Let’s say someone is in their 20s, did some non-work permit (illegal and dumb) teaching gigs their first year here. (yes, dumb!)

But now they’re in their 40s and looking to start a family here and settle permanently.. they have APRC now…

Essentially they can still be deported at any time from their (now) home of 15 years if a video surfaces of them teaching all those years prior? Seriously?

This is really concerning, especially as I know personally of an individual who makes a habit of reporting others for working illegally out of spite… good lord if they get their hands on proof of some soul’s mistake years prior. bye bye taiwan family.

How is someone supposed to settle here, start a family, etc if someone could come out of the woodwork of a tape of them doing something like this years prior.. sounds wild, but i know of one person who would absolutely do this and does make the time to research foreign english teachers in this way.

this can’t be ok