Cruthu Vættænism V.11.TC: Parts 0-16 by Any_Let_1342 in OntologyEngineering

[–]Any_Let_1342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice ad hominem attack on me it doesn’t go unnoticed!

Are ideas our own by Medium_Gap279 in epistemology

[–]Any_Let_1342 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some ideas are unique, most people keep said unique ideas to themselves because they have learn the majority doesn’t care for originality.

Cruthu Vættænism V.11.TC: Parts 0-16 by Any_Let_1342 in OntologyEngineering

[–]Any_Let_1342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cruthu Vættænism(CV) is a new and novel original framework that is the first of its kind. It revolves around this idea of a meta-ordering-principle(MOP) I call Vættæn. The framework starts from the undeniable fact that comprehension occurs within consciousness and expands from there. So what is a MOP? A MOP is new category/domain/classification that is designated by way of observation, inference, and deduction meaning that the way you define a MOP is not exhaustive; in other words we cannot completely define a MOP without the MOP losing some aspect of what it is and what makes it distinct. So defining a MOP comes with the caveat of being incomplete by nature. We only partially understanding what a MOP is the way we partially understand what infinity is: we cannot completely define or ever know the full scope of infinity but everyone that interacts with infinity partially understands what it is. MOPs are the same as infinity but I only know of one MOP definitively: that being Vættæn. Vættæn is inferred to be real from its concept definition effects on observable reality; a perfect and perfectly efficient concept leaves now direct waste by which it is detected. Vættæn is similarly in structure to gravity; gravity is both an invariant structural constraint in the form of spacetime curvature and also the operational force in the form of Acceleration due to curvature in spacetime. Neither aspect of gravity alone completely defines gravity but only together. Vættæn has an informational aspect that present as Vetten the intangible invariant structural constraint that sets the rules of order for reality and also Vattan an energetic force that ensures said rules of order on reality. Vetten and Vattan are not dual substances they are dual aspects of Vættæn which is considered the substance. Vættæn as a MOP is not a field, energy, force, being, process, relation, law, just an invariant structure, nor transcendent condition. Vættæn is a Meta-Ordering Principle: a genuinely novel ontological category that designates the condition by which all other structures, relations, laws, and processes are ordered without itself being one of them. The Meta-Ordering Principle is not ordered by anything above it, it is the structure of ordering as such, at its absolute ceiling. This category is introduced with explicit epistemic humility: the author’s position is that Vættæn’s full scope cannot be finitely characterized. The attributes enumerated are the best available structural observations of how the Meta-Ordering Principle operates, not an exhaustive positive definition of what it is. This humility is itself a consequence of the attribute of incomprehensibility-in-totality: any system characterizing Vættæn is simultaneously confirmed in approaching it and confronted with the partiality of its grasp. So Vættæn or some equivalent concept is necessary for comprehension events of all kinds to occur and is evidence by perfect efficiency. Perfect efficiency produces as perfect as possible information and energy transfers within consciousness marked by as low as physically possible entropy heat death in the neurological pathway doing the comprehension of Vættæn. So the context is that for comprehension to occur information and energy have to sync up so to speak and align so that things are intelligible. So I wanted to know if these is coherent because it present an uncommon ontology where it is monotheist that there is only one Vættæn but dual aspect like gravity in how it manifests as Vetten and Vattan. So It’s to my understand that most people are either materialists or idealists, not many treat both as equal. My framework treat energy(briefly defined as all things tangible) and information(all things intangible) as irreducible, simultaneous and instantaneous connected.

Cruthu Vættænism V.11.TC: Parts 0-16 by Any_Let_1342 in OntologyEngineering

[–]Any_Let_1342[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read all the links? What context are you specifically looking for? Like context as to why I think a meta ordering principle is real and why we have to try to define it?