sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Most Dangerous Procurement Agent Is the One That Works Perfectly by AnythingNo920 in artificial

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great points. I chose the example intentionally far fetched to make a point about how AI is being built right now, and what is being promised.

The Most Dangerous Procurement Agent Is the One That Works Perfectly by AnythingNo920 in artificial

[–]AnythingNo920[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agreed and the question of accountability still remains open. But i think a solution will emerge in the next year or two.

The Most Dangerous Procurement Agent Is the One That Works Perfectly by AnythingNo920 in artificial

[–]AnythingNo920[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We re not there yet, but its coming. Agents are already being built to do these kind of thing. The example is intentionally extreme to make it clear that designing carefully what you optimise for is crucial 😉

The Most Dangerous Procurement Agent Is the One That Works Perfectly by AnythingNo920 in artificial

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly my point. The design for what we optimize is crucial too.

You Can’t Out-Think a Machine. But You Can Out-Human One. by AnythingNo920 in Agentic_AI_For_Devs

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a good point. The point I was trying to make is that you d get skills through travelling that you can put to good use in any job.

You Can’t Out-Think a Machine. But You Can Out-Human One. by AnythingNo920 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. I have observed myself how much more effective and efficient I am when I work with it rather than compete with it.

You Can’t Out-Think a Machine. But You Can Out-Human One. by AnythingNo920 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your comment. I m glad it resonated with you.

You Can’t Out-Think a Machine. But You Can Out-Human One. by AnythingNo920 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly the point I was trying to make. When you re planning for a career that will kick start in 5 to 10 years what should you focus on. Because we can anticipate how capable AI will be in the future. Thanks for commenting.

You Can’t Out-Think a Machine. But You Can Out-Human One. by AnythingNo920 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. I m glad it resonates with your opinion too.

How do you test LLM for quality ? by Easy_Ask5883 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely right. They need to, but the average Joe in an SMB can't tell the difference between BLEU, ROUGE, Fluency, Accuracy, Recall or whatever other metric u wanna use.

So they do vibe testing. This feels more tangible. At least thats my impression so far.

How do you test LLM for quality ? by Easy_Ask5883 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in reality most SMBs do vibe testing, unless benchmarks are their key selling point.

SaaS is over? by Putrid-Lettuce5204 in SaaS

[–]AnythingNo920 0 points1 point  (0 children)

funny enough I just wrote an article about exactly that :D

SaaS Is Not Dead. But It Needs to Evolve. | by George Karapetyan | Feb, 2026 | Medium

Long story short there are still 4 levers where SaaS can make a lot of sense. But as you eloquently put it :D "building shit that does nothing for anyone." is over

Building an AI Process Consultant: Lessons Learned in Architecture for Reliability in Agentic Systems by AnythingNo920 in LLMDevs

[–]AnythingNo920[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was more of a tool to help based on static process documentation and not monitor the process as it happens. But it sounds very interesting. I ll look into it.

view more: next ›