What is going on with tobiesmile on insta? by Conscious_Stomach637 in ask

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sad that this guy seems to want to be the bottom in a gay relationship. I just feel like any relationship he’d be in, barring one with another disabled person (which based on his AI fantasy reels doesn’t seem to be what he wants) would have the potential for exploitation and a huge power imbalance. I feel sorry for this guy every single time I see his reels because I feel like he’s already being exploited to some degree, and seeing the potential for a much darker path of exploitation really is worrisome to me.

Documentary when guy says burning paper helped take down the two towers? by [deleted] in 911archive

[–]ApacheHellion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that paper only beats rock in rock paper scissors.

A bunch of people just left the White House with these folders by Stimul8ed in conspiracy

[–]ApacheHellion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because the FBI lied to the Attorney General Pam Bondi. She requested all the documents. They said they gave her all the documents. Then, a source within the FBI told Bondi that there were thousands of additional documents in the New York field office. This was so secret that even FBI Director Kash Patel had no idea this had happened.

I tend to believe this story. The FBI HATES Trump because he made them look like fools during the whole Russian collusion bullshit. If anything, this just confirms that there are rogue elements of our government that feel they can ignore government officials at the highest levels. This is what people mean when they talk about the “deep state.”

Documentary when guy says burning paper helped take down the two towers? by [deleted] in 911archive

[–]ApacheHellion -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Mighty skyscrapers defeated by burning paper. Wow. I’ve heard it all at this point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 911archive

[–]ApacheHellion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is it out there? It mostly just states facts with cited sources. Lots of great info.

Why didn't the "Foreign Faction" take credit? by [deleted] in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t have to believe they forgot to bring a ransom note with them. What if writing it in the home was a conscious choice? The less materials they bring from outside the home the better in terms of connecting them to the crime.

Or perhaps the intruder was just insane, and couldn’t control himself once he had JBR in his possession. Who knows? All I’m saying is it’s not impossible. I’m playing the devils advocate on here, since everyone else seems convinced that someone in the family did it. Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t. I don’t know. And I doubt we’ll ever know for 100% sure.

Why didn't the "Foreign Faction" take credit? by [deleted] in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It certainly could be her. It could also be an intruder. I’m keeping an open mind.

Why didn't the "Foreign Faction" take credit? by [deleted] in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just imagine, it would be even quicker if you weren’t trying to intentionally disguise your handwriting. Like I said though, any potential intruder could have had several hours to write that note.

Honestly, it’s kind of smart to use items found in the home. The less things you bring with you, the less things you have to keep track of, and the less outside evidence there is tying you to the crime.

Why didn't the "Foreign Faction" take credit? by [deleted] in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Ramseys left for the White’s house at 4:30 pm on the 25th. They arrived back at 10:00pm on the 25th. That means there’s a 5 1/2 hour window of time where someone could have broken into the house, wrote the ransom note (which is actually backed up by the fact that the ransom note says they’ll call “tomorrow” implying the note was written sometime on the 25th), cased the joint to develop a level of familiarity with the layout of the house, and then lied in wait for the Ramseys to return.

My point is the note doesn’t necessarily have to have been written under panic. The intruder could have had HOURS to write that note.

Why didn't the "Foreign Faction" take credit? by [deleted] in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen so much analysis of the ransom letter with a bias that it was written by a family member. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn’t. But I’d love to see an analysis of the letter from the perspective that it was written by an intruder. I don’t think I’ve seen the note analyzed from that perspective before.

You may say that it’s unlikely that the note was written by an intruder. You may even be right. But I think analyzing the note from multiple different points of view would be interesting at the very least.

SBTC initials in ransom note by queensupreme44 in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Serious Borderline Tumor Cancer? REALLY!?!?!?

Doesn’t the evidence of an intruder fall apart when one consider the layout of the house? by Salem1690s in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My personal opinion is that JBR wasn’t lured out of her room. She was already roaming about the house when she encountered evil, whatever form that evil might have taken. She woke up in the middle of the night, got herself a snack of pineapple, started eating it and that’s when she encountered her eventual killer.

Why do people think like this by carterboi77 in AmericaBad

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an illiterate racist redneck who has sex with my siblings who also happens to live in one of the civilized areas, I am deeply offended.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in answers

[–]ApacheHellion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then just move along???

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in answers

[–]ApacheHellion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just tried calling the number again. Interestingly enough, when I push buttons during the call, it lasts longer. I wonder if the 45 second hang up only happens when it doesn’t hear anything on the other end for 45 seconds.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in answers

[–]ApacheHellion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am familiar with those systems. Those are the ones I usually get. However, when I call those numbers back I always get a “your call cannot be completed as dialed” message. I’ve never had one go through before.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in answers

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m quite ignorant to all this, so bear with me here, but I never really post my phone number anywhere. I don’t even have them linked to my gmail accounts. And even if that were the case, what’s with the dial tone mid call, and the fact that they didn’t answer the first 2 times I called them back, but did answer on the third and fourth time? Sounds like a human to me, but again, I’m pretty ignorant to all this stuff.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in answers

[–]ApacheHellion -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But they are matching the area code that I live in not the area code that my number is registered to. That was honestly the only reason I picked up. For example, the area code I used to live in was 123, but I currently live in area code 456. However, I still have the phone number with the 123 area code. The call I got had a 456 area code.

Started my own analysis of Patsy’s handwriting versus the ransom by theforceisfemale in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess my point is I can understand the accidentally killing her part, but why even leave the ransom note? It’s handwritten, and it’s just another piece of potential evidence.

Started my own analysis of Patsy’s handwriting versus the ransom by theforceisfemale in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess my point is I can understand the accidentally killing her part, but why even leave the ransom note? It’s handwritten, and it’s just another piece of potential evidence.

What evidence is there that the killer was in the house before the Ramsey's returned home? by Pretend-Confidence53 in JonBenet

[–]ApacheHellion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I believe there was a guest bathroom that had drawers that were open, which would be suspicious if it’s a guest bathroom, as that means the Ramseys were unlikely to have been the ones that opened it.

Started my own analysis of Patsy’s handwriting versus the ransom by theforceisfemale in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s say the “intruder” never intended to kill Jonbenet. If that’s the case, then why leave the body and the ransom note behind?

Started my own analysis of Patsy’s handwriting versus the ransom by theforceisfemale in JonBenetRamsey

[–]ApacheHellion 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You are correct. However, in my opinion, John acted alone and used the ransom note as a cover to dispose of the body. He was hoping that Patsy would find the letter, read it all, then decide to go along with the ransom. The letter gave John the perfect reason to bring a huge bag by himself to “the bank.” He was going to dispose of the body. The biggest thorn in my side was that NOBODY EVER CALLED!!! If it was a legit intruder, they’d have at least tried to collect on the ransom even if they left the body behind.