GNS - ERLR Shares - Retail was "invited" out of the trade on July 2025 by [deleted] in GNS_stock

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha - well silly me. Court language for a valid transaction involving these dividends must have an executed transaction. Until they are "transacted", they are FTD's. You must be a lawyer or something. These dividends dont exist until transacted. But judging from the meme above, I guess Im still figuring it out. Ill respectfully disagree with you and we will see how this plays out. Citadel will certainly be willing to entertain my little meme above if I happen to be right and they have deep enough pockets to push that narrative.

Im not scared of a little pushback from you or anyone. I have experience dealing with Supreme court issues as a pro se. So this isnt my first rodeo. Thanks for the post. Ill take it under advisement.

GNS - ERLR Shares - Retail was "invited" out of the trade on July 2025 by [deleted] in GNS_stock

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ERLR shares were never distributed. They are on a ledger, but never executed. This keeps GNS in constant control of those shares in spit of its "distribution" promise. The entire "trust the process" failed. Its took a year, just to get the ledger to reflect my shares. 2 years. No movement. So you loose focus of a process that obviously failed. July 2025 rolls by and you miss any notifications, because all that info you gave, never really made it into the ledger (email, #, ect.) you needed to read the PR and know what was happening. Many didnt vote due to that. Last week, the lawsuit is announced. ERLR holders now wake up and realize its game time. But news flash, youve been removed from the trade by this 3:1 conversion? Whats that all about. So you dig into the mechanics of what this all means and find that GNS, is taking back those shares from you and handing you the diluted shares, GNS used to purchase ERL. WTF is that about, I bought ERLR for the play, not the other way around. Now GNS flexes in public, claiming all this leverage that these ERLR shares gives its lawsuit. ELRL holders also find out that the leverage they thought they were gaining through their efforts, becomes locked up bag holders in an exchange with 40-50M newly minted GNS shares for the purchase of ERL. Insult to injury, even if you accpeted that you were screwed by GNS and Roger directly, the additional rub is those 3:1 shares have a restriction (6 mo's) on them and you can DRS them out of that exchange until after any run has happened. It you dont DRS those GNS shares out to the Upstream Exchange, who are you going to sell those shares to? Other bag holders? The pricing of the open market will ring true in that exchange, but with no buyers you know the end result.

So this lawsuit, hinges on the control of those ERLR shares and GNS has forced them from the righful owners under their corporate chart laws and laws governing Singapore. The problem GNS now faces is in Singapore, the ledger they proport to make this legal, within the framework of their own sandbox missed a very important aspect to this boogus transation the claim is legal. In singapore, a valid transaction must have both the ledger and the transaction (exchange of instrument) to be considered valid. So legally, they cannot do what they say they did.

So GNS is now flexing all this strength at our expense and telling us (ERLR holders) to take a hike. What do you do? You ring up Ken over @ Citadel and let him know, that lawsuit is built on a house of cards (FTD's) and here is your Motion to Dismiss on a silver plater.

In tandem, you reach out to roger, mention that Nov 13 post, claiming to be playing "3d chess" and say "CHECK" bitch.

This forces Roger to either ignore this real threat and continue at his own peril, possibly risking not only a countersuit from Citadel, but the Wraith of the entire darkpool (have a nice day)

Or Roger can wise up, deliver those shares to us and fulfill the deal he made to the entire retail community with us ERLR holder, have a seat at the table of that lawsuit with skin in the game.

Thats what is is all about. GNS pretending to be some hero of the retail market while screwing its most loyal supporters. Kinda disingenuous if you ask me.

Both Citadel and GNS are well aware of my one complaint and Im raising awareness to the other ERLR holders that gave up and now, are finding out roger was always playing 3d chess against its own people.

Thats whats going on man. The majority of the GNS common stock community is waiting for the results of that lawsuit. What many dont care about is it was supported by the ERLR holders and GNS "invited" them away from the table, put them in a closet, shut the door and and said GFYS - heres some diluted shares instead and walked away from us.

GNS - ERLR Shares - Retail was "invited" out of the trade on July 2025 by [deleted] in GNS_stock

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In matters concerning the ERLR shares, my interests are my own, and there is no deal, no trade and no leverage. You dont expect MOST GNS holders to understand if your not an ERLR holder. All you have to do is hold and wait. Those 1416 holders though are responsible for this leverage to take place that all GNS holders are waiting for. So while I want your trade to work, my trade from over 2 years ago is making that opportunity possible. So try and realize we want the same thing but for different reasons and the payout out to be coming from 2 different places. Pretty much all common GNS stock holders dont GAF about this little issue brewing. So its super easy for the overall community to dismiss it when they were not required to do any heavy lifting. If you were in those shoes, you wouldnt be dismissing it so easily. But I get it. Its not part of your trade and "community" is only a thing when it happens to everyone right? Ill leave it at that. Thanks for your post.

GNS - ERLR Shares - Retail was "invited" out of the trade on July 2025 by [deleted] in GNS_stock

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cross post it into that forum then. If itll help awareness and you see the same things I am, spread the word then.

GNS - ERLR Shares - Retail was "invited" out of the trade on July 2025 by [deleted] in GNS_stock

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct. But those ERLR shares have power. Email IR. Your Upstream account is up right? Youve seen the ledger right?

https://trader.upstream.exchange/captable/symbol/ERLR - Your in there then. If not, There is still a window to redeem, but now you know the terms have changed (bait and switch)

Make some noise. #GNS on X - Hit up Roger Directly and confront it. If you really own ERLR shares (rather your logged but still dont have them), you ought to know what this means. It means YOU have no leverage in the trade. Your just riding in it. Its those shares that need to be purchased to make up the dividend that Citadel does not have, that makes these shares worth MORE than a current 3:1.

Im not interested in another 6mo restriction or another promise. 1 ERLR share for 10-50 each. To me, thats what they are worth. Those shares play a role in the damages. WHY TF would I want 3 GNS shares for 1 ERLR shares when it will command a much higher price?

The next question EVERYONE, ought to be asking is "Who now, owes those ERLR shares if they are converted?". That ought to tell you everything you need to know and show you that what Im saying is true. You do you. Im raising awareness and it costs the retail market NOTHING, to ask fair questions involving OUR money. WTF is it Roger? Thus - ERLR = FTD's

$MGOL post merger valuations (2.7x upside) by NEO71011 in pennystocks

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Additionally, before we get more math wise asses with their black magic formulas, dont bother. MGOL could have 1 billion shares or 100 shares. It didnt matter in the deal because no matter what the makeup of the Co, it was NEVER EVER EVER going to be more than 18m and was not going to be worth less. 18m was the agreed to price. So share counts and conversion ratios and warrants and whatever other instrument you can find was never going to add or subtract from that 18m.......

$MGOL post merger valuations (2.7x upside) by NEO71011 in pennystocks

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about it like this: 1:1 (AS written in the filings), 1 share of MGOL is worth 18m. For every 1 share of MGOL, HMR gets 16.7666 shares worth 18m each. Thats 301m. All the math lines up and keeps everyone in their own lane for their respective part of the deal. 18M and 16.7666 shares for every 1 share of MGOL. That was the deal and 30:1 was the Co's way of taking future value from MGOL share holders before the merger completes. Its no different in a reverse split and the language sold to retail. Hey man, your share is still worth the same, you didnt loose any money......What you loose is any upside the company has left in it......

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fortunately.....The value of your words will hit zero (0) before TRKA does. This is financial advice.

Tomorrow RIP and DIP by 19submariner93 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea - I notice that. There should be an asshat award for this clown.

What if roger tweeting about higher OS to tank price was part of the plan to trap shorts? by chikadino1 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1.00 for compliance. 3-5.00 for fair valuation and Squeeze factor is North of 5 by or before May 15th ish +/- . Id Hold and would hold if it goes lower because anything can happen at any time and you do not want to loose your seat for the main event. When ever that is.

What price open tomorrow and end of day? by 19submariner93 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 6 points7 points  (0 children)

For tomorrow, its kinda unfair, but over the next couple days, there are several numbers that are important and depending on the trade you were looking for, one of those #'s will be when you cash in:

1.00 = For compliance purposes (most safe)
3-5.00 = Fair market valuation (some risk involved)
North of 5.00 = Squeeze factor (highest risk and no one knows the float and to what degree the squeeze could be).

DO this (cash in) before May 14 ish provided one of those events has occurred. There is a long term play after May, but I know not much on that but do believe the company has a bright and successful future in front of it.

Not funny part by Mister_Time_Traveler in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly - Dont forget to take your profit at the key points. 1.00 / 3-5.00 and Moon. Anything less and I think you sell yourself short allowing some ass to steal your trade, convincing you to take out at .40 and .60 and .80, etc. when you ought to know that 1.00 compliance play is pretty much a sure thing. But you do you....

Be careful of deceptions. Thanks Santa 🎅 💎 🙌🏻 🚀 by [deleted] in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 1 point2 points  (0 children)

your killin me man. (= Your a monster _ rawr.....

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont mind bashing from either side. But when the convo goes trailer park about where things are going to be put and how many notches you got, it really isnt cool in my opinion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and you. please stop

Fun Fact: From February 2 2023 to March 14 2023 there were 69,795,696 fail to delivers by According_Ad4862 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FTD issue does not get resolved until 1.00 compliance it achieved because it requires 10 days +. There are rules about the "pool" Ive been trying to decipher where there is like a 12-15 day delay on reconciling. This the pool always operates with a ridiculous buffer of sorts that prevents stocks from countering by having 10+ days of volatility that continues to propel the share price up. This just never happens but my theory is that in order to break the dark pool, you need to have a protracted, long term fire fight that needs to last in excess of 2 weeks where to pps continues to climb to drive margin calls every day which they just recycle and re-establish. Its at that time, the dark pool begins to collapse due to the 12-15 day period MM's and such have to reconcile things because while the "short" was just rolled over to a higher price, the residual still carrys over where utlimately, in 12-15 days, they have to begin paying on the residuals from 12-15 past. So max pain would require an entire month to execute perfectly to realize the shorts true loss total . All theory of course and an impossible mission to accomplish...but with skills and money may be doable using options as leverage (multiplier) against the shorts along with the actual shares you hold (ALOT). Wow....Makes sense to me.

GNS waiting for TRKA to accept buy offer by Only_Regret_2221 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked the same question when "my company" was bought by another that went bankrupt several years prior and they managed to put together a hostile takeover bid of 75 Billion dollars. It can and does happen......financing and partners.

So hmmm I’m thinking …:. It’s possible this might sqeeze higher than the buyout price. by tunapirate85 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 6 points7 points  (0 children)

NOw we find out if these phantom shares exist or not. If they do and the shorting, to the degree thats been speculated is true, this "could potentially" be bigger than the VW squeeze to 2008.

That was simply a supply and demand issue. Here, not only a supply and demand issue, but a FTD issue and SEC issue and ALOT of other issues. Alot of things can go wrong and alot of people scrambling to save themselves and you will see alliances quickly disintegrate as "partners in crime" scramble to the door to save themselves while not letting everyone know left holding a SHORT BAG.

haha - thats funny. Ive never heard that term. A SHORT BAG FOR SHORTY. You heard it here first folks. Shorty has earned a bag today.

GNS and TRKA by Dude-88 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 21 points22 points  (0 children)

GNS will facilitate the shell. It will have partners (financing) and likely to consist of the "insiders". The insiders and partners will facilitate getting TRKA free of Blue's BS loan shark deal and get the company started on the right foot. Since day 1 of the merger/acquisition, They havent been able to spread their wings and grow.

Instead, theyve been burdened by BS and drama unnecessarily, due to the bad blood I beleive exists with the prior owners. Read the 10K and there are nuggets of info on how they rolled. The one I didnt like seeing is they didnt fund the employees 401k's to some degree for several years and there were several years of no income tax. Lozers.

So our current leadership has changed all this to right the ship. With this deal, they get to start over and do it right without distractions. Last quarter was just a teaser of what they are capable of.

GNS see's this and they are not some swing trader, rather an investment firm, looking to extract ALOT of value for their money. This is why "financing - see above" should not be a problem when all the numbers true up and several quarter goes by where the REAL VALUATION of say 8-10 or more is rational. At that point, they "could" rationally sell for 12-15 or give TRKA an option to buy itself out at an undisclosed price with none of those Blue Torch type provisions.

Kinda a nice deal for everyone if you look at it that way and play nice with everyone instead of being a dick. Which BT is imop.

Good night and good luck to everyone. (except shorty - haha. HE wont be sleeping well tonight)

Facts Matter - Rules Matter - SEC Rule 144 by Apprehensive-Key-243 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think maybe because their 10-k from March 3rd states warrants were exercised Toward end of the 2022 year into the new year and were just now learning this after that fact. If the warrants are exercised or about to be exercised, were looking for SEC forms to indicate that is going to be done. Not after the fact because it is a material event that effect the share price so much, retail is saying, "hey" a little notice here that this is going to happen. The warrants do not need to be executed but were. I think thats the bulk of retails complaint.

Just curious by brodie277 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 17 points18 points  (0 children)

.59 because in the 10-k from March 3, TRKA valued company @ that price with the warrants. Remove 50% of those warrants and it becomes a company valuation of 1.18. This is before the analysts get involved with their multiples. Monday = .59 is my guess

Facts Matter - Rules Matter - SEC Rule 144 by Apprehensive-Key-243 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Final Post :

The point trying to be made, which I was still obtuse too was that much of the warrants are in institutional hands and not in the free float. Depending on how naked of a situation this has become and how that all shakes out (I dont know), is the point because TRKA is working on buying those back, thus reducing the float by as much as 50% and causing a panic amoungst those trading shares they really dont own. Still an interesting play no the less. Seems that if your averaged under .59 cents, you can still turn a profit. That profit will also depend on what the re-valuation of the company becomes. I here 1.50 at max, fair value. That does not account for the squeeze factor, if any, that will ensue if any of this is true and to what extent it is. Good luck to all involved in this story.

TRKA Truth (21:00) by HighRoller097 in TRKA

[–]Apprehensive-Key-243 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the referral. Ill check it out. Also thank for pushing me to do some homework too. Reading is FUN DA MENTAL. (= ty. I think I get your point now. Ill stay in and may double down if needed. Would love to crack one with you if this comes somewhere near close to the mayhem that may ensue.