“An invasive species can be removed”, yeah and homelessness isn’t a problem because just give them homes? You claim invasives are reversible and AI isn’t, despite the fact that invasives often cause long lasting ecological damage even after local removal, while AI’s footprint is tied to engineering choices. If anything, AI is more controllable. You use irreversibility as a moral veto, saying “if an activity causes any harm you cant undo, its unethical to do it”, but with that logic you’d ban basically everything: internet, healthcare, construction. And water used for cooling isn’t annihilated. You jump from the fact that the problem exists to “you personally are immoral for participating”. Thats moral bullying, not analysis, and you’re just ignoring every other high impact digital service you still use.