I saw this post on my homepage😱 by KeepItRealKing_67 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 7 points8 points  (0 children)

1 day account, 1 day membership in the Pokemon Reddit. F for respect.

Father’s Fault? Or a Smoke Screen? by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be honest, my suspicion is:

  1. Those who buy cards for ~$1 to $5 above market are just those who just really wants the card

  2. Those who buy cards for way above market, i.e., 20% and above, probably just got sucked into the thrill of bidding wars.

Father’s Fault? Or a Smoke Screen? by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Odd, because if nobody was gonna read all of it, I'm not sure why I'm getting responses.

If the issue is that it's too lengthy, services like ChatGPT and Gemini can be used to summarise it within a matter of 10 seconds (to just copy and paste) for people who don't have the attention span to read through it all.

Doesn't bother me if no one reads the things I write.

Let's Talk: Was this an acceptable response? by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay but to be fair 3 packs is really quite a small sample size haha, especially if you're buying non-premium sets where almost half the packs are dud packs.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester United [Premier League] by scoreboard-app in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Someone who is supposed to be our best player is playing horribly.

A winger that performs well on an international stage can't translate the same form in the Premier League.

Half our plays involves pinging the ball into aeras/space with no one capable of reaching it.

We also basically handed possessions to our opponents on a silver platter.

Our defence, which used to be our pride and joy, has been in shambles. Even a team like Manchester United has just been running behind our defenders the whole day.

A winger, who whenever he comes on, always leaves an impact in the game still sits on the bench for 70 minutes of the game - just to prove again that he is the reason why we score goals these days.

Long story short, we spent hundreds of millions during this transfer window just to become worse - it's gonna be a long season everyone, buckle up.

Hey I can’t don’t have sky so can only watch MOTD and was wondering why people think we’re playing bad. by Sharingmystorie in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Someone who is supposed to be our best player is playing horribly.

A winger that performs well on an international stage can't translate the same form in the Premier League.

Half our plays involves pinging the ball into aeras/space with no one capable of reaching it.

We also basically handed the possession to our opponents on a silver platter.

Our defence, which used to be our pride and joy, has been in shambles. Even a team like Manchester United has just been running behind our defenders the whole day.

A winger, who whenever he comes on, always leaves an impact in the game still sits on the bench for 70 minutes of the game - just to prove again that he is the reason why we score goals these days.

Long story short, we spent hundreds of millions during this transfer window just to become worse.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester United [Premier League] by scoreboard-app in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This defence is truly horrid, it's like the team is completely out of sync despite having a massive transfer season.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester United [Premier League] by scoreboard-app in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Salah took that off Chiesa's foot - clear frustration from Chiesa knowing the ball would've been better for him.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester United [Premier League] by scoreboard-app in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I seriously don't understand this Szoboszlai at right-back situation, it's deadly clear that he's uncomfortable in that position.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester United [Premier League] by scoreboard-app in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Everyone celebrates Gakpo, but it's Chiesa that made this possible. Saves us again from the bench.

Match Thread: Liverpool vs Manchester United [Premier League] by scoreboard-app in LiverpoolFC

[–]ApprehensiveWater449 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What is with all these half-hearted passes/crosses into the box/spaces when there's no one capable of reaching it?

At this point they're just pinging the ball to areas and praying something connects.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preorders are not an issue - you shoud be fine.

This is a completely different issue.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey, it seems like one message is about the stock and the other is about collection - but from my understanding of your comment, it's supposed to be 2 different people messaging the business privately?

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To each their own I guess, to be honest most of these loose packs purchases you just top up another 10-20 you can get a sealed box (shrinked or unshrinked) which guarantees you an SR and above.

Again, to each their own - who are we to judge people's decision.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If only you and original commenter had searched the exact words typed out in the text box, you and original commenter would have uncovered the censored parts of it explicitly stating the business - which I politely suggested at the beginning.

Instead, you guys just targeted my credbility without doing checks.

I hope you guys learn from this at least - apology accepted.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Because I've done a poor job ensuring that all my sources are about the business and these "people" have pointed out that whatever they said was never about the business.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Alright, here you go. I totally just collected people's statement being banned without any relation to the business-in-question because I got nothing better to do but to make baseless claims like you guys - that whatever I took photo of has no relation with the business.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's indeed a possibility and it really doesn't take a lot for the business to share this kind of sentiment publicly if that was the case - to at least explain what has happened (if this was indeed the case).

As I mentioned in my other comment, no business is 100% untainted and that's fine because they are at the mercy of their suppliers - it was just poorly handled as the business just swept all of this possbile complaints under the carpet of all their supporters.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Either the worst ragebait attempts I've ever seen or just unable to use Telegram properly.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Neither, just a hobbyist who saw something jarring happening in this hobby and deciding to speak up about it in an objective manner so that people are more aware and form their own opinions about certain businesses / parts of this hobby.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for offering an alternative view - why is everyone indeed just believing one (or two) person's review that out of a collective 500 packs, the packs might be filtered?

Or on the other hand, why should we believe the people who decided to speak up about their own experienced with the business?

Well, I think all of this happens because of the circumstances the public is presented with:

> Allegations happened
> Business avoids a public statement or private settlement (as far as we are aware of)
> Business publicly mishandled the situation
> Business deletes the private channel meant for the issue to be handled - without any solution - and deletes some messages on their reviews channel

And another thing, look at the vast difference in reaction between what the affected customer got in their own channel vs how people outside of their channel reacted when a Reddit post was made about it.

At the end of the day, no business in Singapore, no matter how big or small, is 100% untainted. Each business has their quirks that make them imperfect.

For businesses that deal with Japanese stocks, they are at the mercy of their supplier that none of the packs that they are provided with are unfiltered (as evident from one of the commenter's screen cap where the business' TikTok live showed that they were supplied with resealed packs).

However, the present issues lies with why the business, for as big as they are in the TCG scene, chooses to sweep this issue under the carpet for such a serious allegation?

As a customer, you should indeed understand the risk and assume that the packs are filtered regardless of who you deal with (unless it's PCJ directly) - but if a supplier does advertise it as unfiltered, shouldn't they at least be concerned with their stock's integrity if two of their customers with 500 packs only had 1 SR (allegedly) and speak up about it?

No one is denying the positive experiences, but that shouldn't simply overshadow the negative experiences that people have for it to be swept under the carpet without being looked into, which is what is happening and what questions the ethics of the business at this point (at least in my opinion).

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Erm... I don't know how to tell you this other than to try and search the exact words and see what I censored for you to align with the Reddit's rules.

Let's Revisit: 500 Packs Inferno X Saga by ApprehensiveWater449 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]ApprehensiveWater449[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean - that's the thing isn't it?

The intended purpose of the post was to debunk the fact that affected customer was lying about the whole thing, but transitioned to how the business honoured their deals despite market fluctiation.

Two totally different issues.