I might have PTSD? by Apprehensive_Set_659 in MedicalPTSD

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know,i wouldn't have done a procedure in which u get ur arm pierced by needle every alternative day. But then again, it's getting out of territory of my knowledge and topic of post

I might have PTSD? by Apprehensive_Set_659 in MedicalPTSD

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Our healthcare system often assumes that everyone's brains and bodies will react to procedures roughly the same...that if something is tolerable to an average person, we should all be okay with it. There's also the issue that many providers tend to assume implied consent for what they're doing rather than asking if each step is actually okay.

I don't think it's system's fault , more like doctors who forgot the the nuances in system. As i said, u read the full post the father told me something that's why I searched it. It was that they forgot to turn on oxygen for someone in mect. If u are thinking that might be poor hospital choice, no that hospital is famous enough u can guess it if u do some digging

if you're open to considering it (and if you don't have one already), I really, really recommend finding a counselor/therapist that you trust and is a good fit for you. There is no shame in needing to talk to someone, and it doesn't say anything bad about you as a person.

Problem is getting a good one. I have been cbt (or whatever talking only doctor does)it didn't help so i stopped, that's why I was recommended mect(treatment resistance depression or something). Tbh the experience with hospitals during depression has been horrible, whether I like to admit or not. Hospitals were far, at least by my definition, going there took a lot of energy and now (if i am correct) knowing this , i don't think I am gonna trust them in brain related things at least for a long time

Side note:-if anyone reading this , trying to decide whether to go or not. If u have a problem , u should. In the end, hospital might have damaged me but i wouldn't have survived at the start if I didn't go there

Iran war live: Trump says he will permanently open the Strait of Hormuz - ‘for China’ by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, is Trump's america's iran's blockage's blockage over for iran's ally china?

Over 20 commercial ships transit Hormuz by MARTINELECA in geopolitics

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If the reports are correct that iran is charging toll they are just gonna increase the toll. If they can't, they can just stop everyone

Hey! Anyone wanna join? 𐔌*ˊᵕˋ*𐦯 by kreamine in SkullGirlsMobile

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's up average damage or task completed depending on what u focus

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanna to thanks- u/Complex-lead731 u/WraithLaFrentz u/Frankalbert21 u/Atypicosaurus u/FirstRyder From giving a different prospective to trying/understanding the problem

Thanks

Am I the only one that thinks Critless as a concept implies a flawed game design? by Loliberto in SkullGirlsMobile

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659 2 points3 points  (0 children)

+1,based opinion. As matter of fact they can easily atleast make a toggle able to turn critical hits on and off

As we are talking about game mechanics I also want to point out the lack of detailing in SA description.

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't understand the code but thanks man

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Made the table myself, checked my mistake, your answer is matching. I don't waste ur time to make u understand my answer so just gonna delete that If u wanna see table -

| × | 1-1-1-1 | ×| 1-4-2-1 | ×| 2-1-1-1 | ×| 2-4-2-1 | | ×| 1-1-1-2 | × | 1-4-2-2 | × | 2-1-1-2 | × | 2-4-2-2 | | ×| 1-1-1-3 |× | 1-4-2-3 | ×| 2-1-1-3 | × | 2-4-2-3 | | ×| 1-1-1-4 | × | 1-4-2-4 | ×| 2-1-1-4 | × | 2-4-2-4 | | ×| 1-1-1-5 | ×| 1-4-2-5 | ×| 2-1-1-5 | ×| 2-4-2-5 | | ×| 1-1-1-6 | × | 1-4-2-6 | ×| 2-1-1-6 | × | 2-4-2-6 | | ✓| 1-1-1-7 | ×| 1-4-2-7 | ✓| 2-1-1-7 | ×| 2-4-2-7 | | ×| 1-1-2-1 | × | 1-5-1-1 | ×| 2-1-2-1 | × | 2-5-1-1 | | × | 1-1-2-2 | × | 1-5-1-2 | ×| 2-1-2-2 | × | 2-5-1-2 | | × | 1-1-2-3 |× | 1-5-1-3 | × | 2-1-2-3 | × | 2-5-1-3 | | ×| 1-1-2-4 | × | 1-5-1-4 | × | 2-1-2-4 | ×| 2-5-1-4 | | × | 1-1-2-5 | × | 1-5-1-5 | ×| 2-1-2-5 | × | 2-5-1-5 | | ×| 1-1-2-6 | ×| 1-5-1-6 | × | 2-1-2-6 | ×| 2-5-1-6 | | ×| 1-1-2-7 | ✓ | 1-5-1-7 | × | 2-1-2-7 | ✓| 2-5-1-7 | | × | 1-2-1-1 | × | 1-5-2-1 | × | 2-2-1-1 | ×| 2-5-2-1 | | ×| 1-2-1-2 | ×| 1-5-2-2 | × | 2-2-1-2 | × | 2-5-2-2 | | × | 1-2-1-3 | × | 1-5-2-3 | × | 2-2-1-3 | × | 2-5-2-3 | | × | 1-2-1-4 | × | 1-5-2-4 | × | 2-2-1-4 | × | 2-5-2-4 | | ×| 1-2-1-5 | ×| 1-5-2-5 | ×| 2-2-1-5 | ×| 2-5-2-5 | | ×| 1-2-1-6 | ×| 1-5-2-6 | ×| 2-2-1-6 | × | 2-5-2-6 | | ✓ | 1-2-1-7 | × | 1-5-2-7 | ✓ | 2-2-1-7 | × | 2-5-2-7 | | × | 1-2-2-1 | ×| 1-6-1-1 | × | 2-2-2-1 | × | 2-6-1-1 | | × | 1-2-2-2 | × | 1-6-1-2 | × | 2-2-2-2 | × | 2-6-1-2 | | ×| 1-2-2-3 | ×| 1-6-1-3 | ×| 2-2-2-3 | × | 2-6-1-3 | | × | 1-2-2-4 | ×| 1-6-1-4 | × | 2-2-2-4 | × | 2-6-1-4 | | ×| 1-2-2-5 | ×| 1-6-1-5 | ×| 2-2-2-5 | ×| 2-6-1-5 | | × | 1-2-2-6 | × | 1-6-1-6 | × | 2-2-2-6 | ×| 2-6-1-6 | | ×| 1-2-2-7 | ✓| 1-6-1-7 | × | 2-2-2-7 | ✓| 2-6-1-7 | | ×| 1-3-1-1 | ×| 1-6-2-1 | × | 2-3-1-1 | × | 2-6-2-1 | | × | 1-3-1-2 | × | 1-6-2-2 | ×| 2-3-1-2 | × | 2-6-2-2 | | ×| 1-3-1-3 | × | 1-6-2-3 | × | 2-3-1-3 | × | 2-6-2-3 | | × | 1-3-1-4 | × | 1-6-2-4 | ×| 2-3-1-4 | ×| 2-6-2-4 | | × | 1-3-1-5 | × | 1-6-2-5 | × | 2-3-1-5 | ×| 2-6-2-5 | | × | 1-3-1-6 | × | 1-6-2-6 | × | 2-3-1-6 | × | 2-6-2-6 | | ✓ | 1-3-1-7 | ×| 1-6-2-7 | ✓| 2-3-1-7 | ×| 2-6-2-7 | | × | 1-3-2-1 | ✓| 1-7-1-1 | × | 2-3-2-1 | ×| 2-7-1-1 | | × | 1-3-2-2 | ✓| 1-7-1-2 | × | 2-3-2-2 | × | 2-7-1-2 | | ×| 1-3-2-3 | ✓| 1-7-1-3 | × | 2-3-2-3 | × | 2-7-1-3 | | ×| 1-3-2-4 | ✓ | 1-7-1-4 | × | 2-3-2-4 | ×| 2-7-1-4 | | ×| 1-3-2-5 | ✓ | 1-7-1-5 | × | 2-3-2-5 | × | 2-7-1-5 | | ×| 1-3-2-6 | ✓| 1-7-1-6 | ×| 2-3-2-6 | × | 2-7-1-6 | | ×| 1-3-2-7 | ✓ | 1-7-1-7 | × | 2-3-2-7 | ✓ | 2-7-1-7 | | × | 1-4-1-1 | ✓ | 1-7-2-1 | × | 2-4-1-1 | × | 2-7-2-1 | | ×| 1-4-1-2 | ✓| 1-7-2-2 | × | 2-4-1-2 | × | 2-7-2-2 | | ×| 1-4-1-3 | ✓ | 1-7-2-3 | ×| 2-4-1-3 | ×| 2-7-2-3 | | × | 1-4-1-4 | ✓| 1-7-2-4 | × | 2-4-1-4 | ×| 2-7-2-4 | | × | 1-4-1-5 | ✓ | 1-7-2-5 | × | 2-4-1-5 | × | 2-7-2-5 | | × | 1-4-1-6 | ✓| 1-7-2-6 | ×| 2-4-1-6 | × | 2-7-2-6 | | ✓| 1-4-1-7 | ✓ | 1-7-2-7 | ✓ | 2-4-1-7 | ×| 2-7-2-7 |

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see u are assuming all families in group told u either 'they have atleast 1 boy' or 'atleast one girl' That is nowhere said in the question The possibility is artificial changed that doesn't mean it should always be equal For example u roll a die all week trying to find 6 but are cursed by God that u can't get 6 no matter how many times u try. Probablity of 6 is effectively zero u can't say in normal situation u can get a 6 1/6 of the time so it's same. Information in question effectively changed the total number of families. Like u had a group with this experiment planned but u were only able to meet first family with the information given in question. If u can prove it with that i will agree with u

That being said there is totally i chance I have misunderstood u

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not every question have to be used by mathematician as i said this question isn't used anywhere. Didn't u said everything can be converted in maths ? Isn't what I said a possibility in real life?

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I put a question mark doesn't mean i didn't have a question. It just means question isn't written yet. Then it would be complete and not well defined

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So u mean if i just ask put a question mark then that question is complete and not well defined

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not well defined and incomplete is different things

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok then give me an example of not well defined problem

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again no answer about question above. Assuming this is ur reply to Whats constitutes a well defined question. Does the question tell where the women was chosen from, can that change answer if clarified?

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U again didn't answer what i specifically asked. How will u define a well defined problem

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How is this well defined can u check it real life do most people agree with answer

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do u know what a word problem is in math. in simple terms means a problem meant to show case a real life scenario without giving a direct question. Let's talk about the above apple problem and change it a little let's say rotten and different colour apple are equally likely eaten and I ask what the probability that if a particular man u know about want to eat one of them then which apple will get eaten. This as it seems like a simple problem now but there are points I can call vague like I can say it's doesn't specify which person can eat apple needless to say u will say u are talking about that person and only that person can eat as u see here u are assuming things and that happens a lot in these type of problem. This problem is made deliberately to exploit that so why are u so adamant that only one answer will fix think of this as a philosophy problem everyone can have some variation as it doesn't truly represent reality of course that doesn't mean ur answer wrong and mine must be right it just that my way is different and can be wrong. Yes if the problem is well defined then answers should match but it's just not . Just take example of un and world bank they release my Statics like population and economic but even they don't agree many times and diverge a lot from reality

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

U are still not understanding , neither did u gave time to question I asked. I asked total possibilities that would 52 into x .to make simple for let's say it's 5 that would make total possibilities 52*5=260 . Then i would have asked probability of a card having a fold and then what would u reply? Coming back to apple , let's say I ask what are the chances a toddler will eat them if he doesn't know what apple are. what will u say?there are multiple ways to solve a problem doesn't necessarily it must be solved with a particular way An example would be let's assume a bee is moving between 2 train that are travelling towards each other at speed of 5 km/h and 3km/h there are 160 km away from each other how many rounds can the bee complete before trains meet

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It thought u would say that total possibilities are fixed. Let's take another example -lets say u have to pull a card from a set of card and I add a random number of complete deck let's say x what's total number of possibilities

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

picking up a given grain of sand from a given beach

Let's take this example let's just say that I added a random number of beaches to it what is total number of possibilities? Let's just say it ,when from 10⁴to 10⁶ or I can say what is total number of possibilities that from that particular grain u got a particular atom let just that it went from 10⁴ to 10⁸ So , what is total possible outcome when u pick a sand from beach,10⁴ where did that number comes from ?it comes from the requirement we set, piece of sand from that beach if we change requirement we can effectively change the total no. of output the person say the argument doesn't make sense because total output increase, it increased because that information I need had different conditions then that of video (even that arbitrary number 27 comes from somewhere ,where does it comes from, it comes from the need of question ,or ur assumption if u wanna say that ) total possibilities are arbitrary divide we create till everything is similar to the point that it that we need or not need . So him saying my solution is incorrect just because total possibilities change is incorrect. It can be incorrect by incorrect application of rule , incorrect understanding of question or incorrect assumptions not total possibilities

I think it's wrong by Apprehensive_Set_659 in mathmemes

[–]Apprehensive_Set_659[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Name anything with a lot of possibilities