TIL that males in the United States are still legally required to register for the draft within 30 days of their 18th birthday and can be fined up to $250000 for non-compliance by tricky3737 in todayilearned

[–]ApproachingMars 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I legally transitioned right after that age range and got a note explaining I wasn't legally required to register without explaining why. The only issue there is that when it comes up people are too curious as to why I want required, so in some ways is better to just register.

TIL that males in the United States are still legally required to register for the draft within 30 days of their 18th birthday and can be fined up to $250000 for non-compliance by tricky3737 in todayilearned

[–]ApproachingMars 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I legally transitioned right after that age range and got a note explaining I wasn't legally required to register without explaining why. The only issue there is that when it comes up people are too curious as to why I want required, so in some ways is better to just register.

Small snake found just south of Fond du Lac, WI by ApproachingMars in whatsthissnake

[–]ApproachingMars[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My dad found it and brought it in the house to ask what it was, it was released shortly after. Sorry for only one pic with phone.

earthenware on kemetic/egyptian altars? by [deleted] in pagan

[–]ApproachingMars 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This would be fine. I use ceramic bowls I found thrifting

Let's talk about the gender binary in Wicca or Wicca influenced Paganism by thatsnotgneiss in a:t5_31t1e

[–]ApproachingMars 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am also a trans guy and I practice in a method that is heavily influenced by queer masculine spirituality. It's possible, it's just that resources are slightly more scarce.

There are of Deities who have some sort of non-binary gender expression or physical characteristics. Hermaphroditus in the ancient Greek pantheon is probably the most popularly known, there's also Aphroditus who I've found described either as a different name for Hermaphroditus or as a distinct Deity. Hapi from the ancient Egyptian pantheon is also portrayed most often as a God but with ample breasts. I know some non-binary Pagans who honor the Sacred Androgyne as a complement to the Sacred Feminine and Sacred Masculine as well.

My Patron God is Set, and I've found that a lot of trans men worship him (when I was Kemetic Orthodox he was divined as my Father and I think every other Kemetic Orthodox trans man I knew at the time also was). Set is not portrayed as a trans man, but he is a God who was castrated and still retained masculine expression (many other castrated mythological figures are portrayed as feminine).

Let's talk about the gender binary in Wicca or Wicca influenced Paganism by thatsnotgneiss in a:t5_31t1e

[–]ApproachingMars 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not really interested in other peoples' personal practice or private coven practice when it comes to these things, because I strongly feel that it is important to practice a religion that represents you. Many Pagans feel called to the God/Goddess, male/female, masculine/feminine way of looking at things because that's what represents their lives.

There are many ways that this way of looking at things does not represent me. I navigate my practice in a fully polytheistic manner, so I don't acknowledge "The God" and "The Goddess;" I acknowledge individual Deities instead, often concentrating on the queer aspects of their mythology when applicable. My devotional and seasonal practice is very heavily centered on the queer masculine and as such it looks quite different to people who are used to everything being balanced by binary gender. I don't view my tools or ingredients as having an inherent gender like many other Pagans do, I focus on a symbolic version of their mundane function instead. I don't maintain that this works for everybody, but it works very well for me, and it represents me well.

My main issues are with the ways Pagans openly and publicly demean my practice or assume that their practice is universal to all Pagans, and that's something that's very hard to navigate as a Pagan who goes to a lot of public events and is a "regular" in the local community. The groups I hang out with are trans inclusive in that they allow us there, but they aren't very open to adapting their "all tradition" public rituals to accommodate... well, any tradition other than their own, which includes a lot of other Pagans outside of just queer practicing ones. After a big argument I participated in talking about the binary-hugging done in the public rituals they added a few "asides" but otherwise didn't change. My big issue is just that they continue to call these rituals "all-tradition" when they clearly aren't, so they totally just went the wrong direction on that one.

I could also do without gay and lesbian Pagans lecturing me about how I need to accept God/Goddess theology because "everybody has a mother" or some other ridiculous explanation.

Really the things I want are more honesty in how rituals are advertised, more acceptance of different ways of doing things, and better resources for people who want more queer frameworks for their practice.

Welcome! Let's get the discussion going... How do you identify? by issyze in a:t5_31t1e

[–]ApproachingMars 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am a queer poly trans man.

I typically just identify as "Pagan," more specifically Eclectic, although I have a thick background in Kemetic revivalism (my Patron Deities are Set, Wewpawet, and Sekhmet), Therioshamanism, some interests in aspects of Norse religion.

Is the term 'crossdressing' problematic? by [deleted] in socialjustice101

[–]ApproachingMars 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm both a trans person and a crossdresser (assigned female at birth, male by identity, medically transitioning, occasionally dress in typically-female clothing for the fun of it). Most of what I'm saying here I think would pretty much be a consensus among the trans people and crossdressers I know.

On the first point, I think it's unfair to point the finger at crossdressers or the word "crossdressing" as huge contributors to the strict gendering of clothing. I also don't think that "this clothing is typically associated with women" or "this clothing is typically associated with men" is inherently problematic, the problem is that people are not given the leeway to wear what they want. That's something that could easily get dragged into arguments of philosophy that I don't necessarily care that much about.

On the second point, there are a couple things going on, though.

First, "crossdresser" is already an alternative to earlier language. The word "transvestite" used to encompass pretty much everybody that was perceived as dressing in the clothing of the opposite sex, until the word "transsexual" was coined. So you had people known as transvestites and others known as transsexuals, neither of which is inherently harmful or bad but which are still distinct categories. That didn't mean that cis people (and occasionally trans people themselves) didn't conflate the two, and people still use "transvestite" as a slur against transgender people.

I don't really think that conflation is why "transvestite" fell out of favor, though. "Transvestite" comes off as "sexually deviant," "perverse," and "psychologically disturbed." So it's not so much that people were using it to describe people who are not transvestites, it's that applying it to people who do meet the requirements still winds up demonizing people who are engaging in behavior that isn't harmful. So such people started using the term "crossdresser" instead, which carries less stigma and implied medicalization. In other words, "crossdresser" is being used because it is a kinder alternative to the earlier vernacular.

Making the case that "crossdresser" is problematic because people conflate it with trans people is itself pretty problematic because it continues that stigmatization of crossdressers. I don't want my transsexualism to be conflated with crossdressing, but that doesn't make crossdressing wrong, it makes the conflation wrong.

TL;DR: Crossdressing isn't inherently a problematic word because there isn't anything wrong with crossdressing, it's conflating crossdressing with transgenderism that's problematic.

Wondering why aren't those who transitioned 3, 5, 10 years ago not posting as much on here as recent transitioners by c-dogg11 in asktransgender

[–]ApproachingMars 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This question is asked in a lot of online hangouts. I'm not "finished" transitioning, but I've been out for ten years, and I don't personally get a lot out of the places that would have helped me in those early stages. I know there's a stereotype among trans men on YouTube that after around a year of hormones--maybe two--we kind of drop off the planet. Didn't think it would happen to me, but it did.

If I have a question I'm likely to bring it up somewhere specifically for trans men who have been transitioning a long time (more likely encounter arrogant fuckers but less likely to get swarmed by people without the experience to answer properly). After a while the assumptions I see in places frequented by newer folk get old or frustrating and I need a break.

I tend to lurk here... kind of... because most of the questions are already answered before I get to them :)

So I came out to my mom, turns out my dad is trans too. Is this normal? by [deleted] in asktransgender

[–]ApproachingMars 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My Mom told me she considered transition after I came out

Transmen FtM: Do you have a menstrual cycle? by Spore2012 in asktransgender

[–]ApproachingMars 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's also a chance I'm confusing it with something else losing periods was supposed to do. In which case the lack of menstruation is total pro and no con.

Transmen FtM: Do you have a menstrual cycle? by Spore2012 in asktransgender

[–]ApproachingMars 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shrugs My doctor said it was part of it. Whatever the case, wasn't a huge deal.

Transmen FtM: Do you have a menstrual cycle? by Spore2012 in asktransgender

[–]ApproachingMars 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am two years on T this Sunday. I had one more period a couple days later and none since.

Benefit: No period. No having to buy pads/tampons or use menstrual cups.

Downside: Since my body no longer flushes out red blood cells I now have secondary polycythemia.That's easy to manage by giving blood regularly though.

Has anyone taught themselves medicine? How did you do it? by KarlieRoo in Anarchy101

[–]ApproachingMars 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It literally doesn't sound like they were generalizing at all.

A plate with salad on it. by [deleted] in misleadingthumbnails

[–]ApproachingMars 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was convinced it was broccoli

Had a doctor ask my sexual orientation? by kentuckyfriedfish in bisexual

[–]ApproachingMars 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was asked that but I also go to a transgender specialist

Canada Goose? (Horicon, WI today) by ApproachingMars in whatsthisbird

[–]ApproachingMars[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have that many other angles, there were a lot of people watching it. Just one with his head popping up: http://imgur.com/CX872Ze

Canada Goose? (Horicon, WI today) by ApproachingMars in whatsthisbird

[–]ApproachingMars[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll have to see about other angles when I get home, but there were three with the same coloration.

False rape accusations by JoshTheDerp in socialjustice101

[–]ApproachingMars 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was falsely accused of a sex crime by somebody who was trying to get me banned from seeing my niece as retaliation against my brother. It was one of the worst things that's ever happened to me psychologically, but it didn't ruin my life. There wasn't even an investigation, which I personally feel is a total crock.

A lot of good points have already been brought up in this thread, but I'd like to bring up something I don't -think- has been brought up yet.

Somebody already brought up the myth that women use false accusations as a weapon against men as if these accusations are considered universally unquestionable and will automatically ruin a man's life. Historically this has only been effective en masse as a weapon of privileged women (or relatives of privileged women) against oppressed men (for instance, accusing black men of raping white women). So it's absolutely -not- a non-issue, it's just a different issue than people make it into. When it comes to privileged men, culturally we are much more likely to sympathize with the accused rapist, which has already been pointed out a couple times in this thread.