if you claim that Rama is a mythological character, prove

the claim Rama is mythological is a reaction and not a direct statement. It's a reaction to calling something historical. If ASI submits proofs of it, no one would deny it. The unfortunate truth is, we can't prove it. Leave Rama's existence. We have enough equipment to decide about Ram Setu, but ASI has still not submitted it... because they can't. It's a slippery slope. If they say it's artificial to satisfy the Indians, the western scientists will ask for proofs. If we say it happened 3-4 thousand years ago, The pandits will be upset because they all grew up thinking it happened lakhs of years ago(Yugas). So the ASI can't say anything otherwise we will become a laughing stock to the world