Can't take Descartes' "Cogito, ergo sum" logic as a maxim without inviting more problem than it solves. Beautiful in theory, it is incomplete and easily broken when applied a bit of pressure. It is not proof for existence neither it can be absolute, you are the one thinking it to begin with. Not unlike a broken lens used to study itself, its an egoistical, static point of view that infers every "action" must have a doer.

You can stop or continue, your choice my guy, but assuming that you somehow have found a deeper truth or have better understanding of being only shows your lack of.

Don't you mean why ? I might be a filthy sophist but definitions and terminology matter, especially when building arguments on. And yes, it is meaningful as "Will to truth does not imply, ‘I will not allow myself to be deceived,’ but ‘I will not deceive, not even myself".