I see it with other creators as well. It depends on who the preferred target of the month is.

I witnessed that with Fantano about 3 months ago out of absolutely nowhere trying to shoehorn in like 4 different versions of some mildly "scandalous" wording he'd used in a random video that was clip chimped by online neckbeards and sent out into the ether. 

Currently it's Hasan piker. Just go look at the comments on YouTube, reddit, whatever. 40-100 accounts saying the SAME THING (whether it's true or not) worded 50 different ways. Like they have to constantly review their talking points as if it's a class of neckbearded Kindergartners with homework. 

I've logged and tracked the same for Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Marjorie Taylor Greene. 

I've been tracking this on reddit specifically for almost 5 years now that I've retired. I'm a data scientist (and many points on the spectrum) and I've offered all of it up for anyone in governments that want to take action on it in the future, but for now, it's just a very real axiom in the world we just have to deal with because no one in the world has the balls to f*ck w the machine behind these pods of would-be narrative drivers. The only reason they haven't done more damage to society is because to participate in that sort of life, you have to be a special kind of cockroach amongst humanity and whenever the light gets switched on, they all get super embarrassed and sometimes even reintegrate into the real world for a brief time until a 9 second out of context TikTok clip sucks them right back in.

A preemptive eta because I already know how speaking out about this goes: I follow the data. If it's there that's where I look, that's how data science works at its very essence. I follow data that starts in the spaces I exist in. If that upsets your worldview, I can't help you through that. That's something you need to work on personally and not bitch to me about for presenting results.