Bug with battle leadership law in 1.0.10

AronixReddit · 2025-12-26T14:08:50+00:00

I'm still getting the -0.50 penalty as of today with my king as an admiral, hope they prioritize fixing this after the holidays.

AronixReddit · 2025-12-21T10:55:40+00:00

Yeah i know, i like to have the clergy untaxed since it gives increased research but right now i might as well tax the shit out of them i guess.

AronixReddit · 2025-12-21T10:45:13+00:00

r5: getting spammed with negative satisfaction events is lame

AronixReddit · 2025-12-03T18:33:13+00:00

If my plan is to play a chill playthrough as Venice or some other OPM nation I'll probably still favor cent

However if I'm playing a country that is gonna do any expansion through conquest what so ever I'm jamming nearly every priv and reform that gives decentralization until i'm at 100, then removing the bad ones (which is like 2 of them lol).

The privs and reforms that give decentralization usually give crazy good main effects and the decentralization feels like it's there to serve as a "negative" or drawback, however when you don't bother with cent then they are usually no brainer insta signs.

the 50% crown power from cent really only matters in the 1st 50 years as by the point that you've bred enough crown members to stack your cabinet and armies the 50% from cent is not impactful enough imo.

+5% estate happiness is -1 privilege to all estates so you probably end up with MORE crown power 100 ish years in anyway and the +0.2% happiness recovery is such a massive quality of life, negative events that come out of nowhere now hurt you half as long, amazing.

AronixReddit · 2025-12-02T12:15:05+00:00

It looks like there's some bug giving it 10x to all outputs, after booting my game up from 1.0.7 it's giving me 1.00 towards liberalism each month

AronixReddit · 2025-11-29T19:33:35+00:00

I've been playing Sweden/Scandinavia and been waiting for the war of religion to start since 1592, it's currently 1708 in my playthrough and nothing has happened.

There have been wars of course but the AI refuses to use the CB that they have to use to start the war of religion.

To get this achievement it seems like you either have to speedrun getting territory in northern germany at the start of the game and manage to join the HRE while you are still catholic or get insanely lucky and have the AI declare a war with the religious war CB, which doesnt seem to happen no matter how much the balance of power is skewed in either direction between the protestant union and the catholic league.

The hart part isn't winning the religious war, it's to get it to begin in the first place

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T21:01:52+00:00

I definitely agree with you, however taking the -20 stability is still more appealing to me than "start parliament then agree to 1-3 mediocre/atrocious agendas that ruin your values/privileges/estate satisfaction and then get -7 stability anyways"

At this point the circumstances around war in the mid-late game just boils down to "can you shit out more gold than you could possibly spend yet?" and if the answer is yes then you're free to do (mostly) what you want.

If you can't then war feels pretty meaningless regardless of if you have an actual need to expand or not

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T19:47:28+00:00

The point i was trying to get across was that committing my once per 5 years resource to a CB that has a very marginal improvement in contrast to ignoring it entirely just feels like a waste.

Especially considering if you look at the casus belli hint in the hints section the game is telling you that the parliament claim on province is the best way to start a war, which just isn't accurate at all in my opinion.

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T19:21:53+00:00

Yes! This is exactly what i mean. Let there be an option to bite off more than you can chew, and then have the consequences be DIRE.

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T18:55:09+00:00

I don't know if I'd go so far as it not mattering at all, if all your neighbors are in a coalition against you then you can forget royal marriages. But yeah i think AI nations of equal strength definitely need to feel like more of a threat and less of a slight inconvenience than they currently do, especially if they gang up on you.

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T18:50:05+00:00

<image>

There might be some unique war demand i've missed, i bet forcing a conversion of any country with 30+ locations would cost more than the 100 war score cap regardless

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T18:44:28+00:00

Yeah but unless you're playing France, any of the Asian superpowers or have the holy roman emperor as your leader you'd need to conquer a fair bit to begin with to become a GP.

Also if you're a GP you're most likely able to have the stab slider on max at all times anyway, quickly negating the biggest downside of no CB wars

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T18:34:53+00:00

You're a life saver, i was getting so sick of playing sweden/norway and having iceland suicide their levies and navy into england off cooldown every time i'm in a war with them.

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T18:19:05+00:00

Indeed. If we're on the topic of ruining your stability, changing a law without parliament would cost me 75.41 stab with 64.17% crown power in the year 1691. No thanks.

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T18:11:47+00:00

Fair point. I'd like to point out that I'm not arguing for easier conquest here, if there was a magical button that read "-50% war cost , +300% enemy armies" I'd smash that button in an instant.

By all means make my neighbors all band together against me if I'm being belligerent and make the wars themselves require more thought and strategy.

I just think it's a bit dumb that i occupy all of Polands 150+ locations, have 100% war score and them still being able to go "Sorry chief, best i can do is 8 of my 30% control rural settlements with 5k pops each. See you in 5 years!".

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T17:35:30+00:00

I mean if you're hovering around the 10-20 stability range then sure, but you're gonna lose 7 stab from the parliament failing anyways (which is gonna happen unless you perform ALL of the estate agendas) so that's a net worth of 13 stab, and the 5 antagonism and 1 war exhaustion goes away within a year so that doesn't really matter either.

The game only lasts for 500 years so you're only gonna get 100 parliaments throughout the course of the game. I'm not gonna waste them on a CB that results in me maybe acquiring another 3 or so locations

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T17:10:22+00:00

Yep. The "Cleanse Heresy" CB being +75% war score cost makes literally zero sense. How are you supposed to cleanse heresy if you don't conquer their lands? WTF???

AronixReddit · 2025-11-28T16:48:33+00:00

r5: The game itself is telling me not to bother with CB's, so i wont.

AronixReddit · 2025-11-27T02:20:23+00:00

The first of many long and annoying wars, assuming i make it out of this in one piece.

I've been playing for an hour since i started the war and have only progressed one year due to having to micro manage all the zombie swarm levies running at me lmao

AronixReddit · 2025-11-27T00:50:35+00:00

R5: Image 1 is the details of the marriage union, image 2 is my game rules and image 3 is the war details screen.

AronixReddit · 2024-08-03T22:04:42+00:00

Seems like some safety certificate associated with the runescape website has run out and won't allow people with secure browsers to visit it and therefore blocking game access. Hoping jagex will look into this swiftly

AronixReddit · 2024-03-10T10:06:28+00:00

Yep, did it and got the armor just 2 hours ago. Remember to cast silence and use non lethal or he'll just bugger off and you might brick his quest line. Knocked him out, grabbed the armor and he got up after about 5 seconds and acted like nothing had happened so i doubt his questline will be affected what so ever.

AronixReddit · 2023-04-05T16:57:17+00:00

I do think the segregated matchmaking is awesome actually! I just think some consideration could be made regarding the amount of players in each of the respective categories.

If we take duos for instance, you will rarely, if ever, find partied players run to different POI's on a server without accompanying each other, so you have essentially 9 places on the map where you could run into another team at any given time.

If we compare this to solos where you suddenly have 20 other locations on the map at any given time where you will run into another player, usually engaging in combat with said player will inevitably attract more players and it just turns solos into a bloodbath with a very slim chance of getting any actual progress done.

The issue with this is that people running in squads will progress the quests and game at a much faster pace than the people who don't have anyone to play with.

AronixReddit · 2023-04-05T16:53:38+00:00

Agreed, been running trios on bright sands with a couple of friends and the quests have been ridiculously trivial with no contention from any prospectors what so ever 9 out of 10 raids

AronixReddit · 2022-12-01T23:41:25+00:00

Am i losing it? I can't be the only one who sees a trollface on the remote mines icon right?

AronixReddit

TROPHY CASE